Ashby
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
-
- Posts: 10253
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Re: Ashby
Good to see Tony Abbott has more important things to do with his time than take the bait.
http://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/ne ... b/1692718/
So Gillard and her merry band of fellow tweeters may twitter till their hearts content, as this is what twittering twits do.
http://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/ne ... b/1692718/
So Gillard and her merry band of fellow tweeters may twitter till their hearts content, as this is what twittering twits do.
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Ashby
Meanwhile... Ashby is appealing and going to Fair Work with his claims about Slipper..
Told you he'd appeal and it'd go further.
Told you he'd appeal and it'd go further.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25701
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Ashby
Simple answer to this and in your own words tooAussie wrote:Got to give credit where it is due. In that Thread, Naffy talks about a Geoff and a Beowulf. What is that all about?
Aussie wrote:That would be none of your business. You ought simply concern yourself with making a contribution other than one about matters which have fuck all to do with you.
Re: Ashby
Rares' Judgment was forensic, he carefully set out the facts as presented BY ASHBY in the Pleadings, the way the litigation was conducted, and he painstakingly set out the Law, citing relevant cases. It was a well considered, and well presented, solid and I believe, bullet proof decision. If Ashby does appeal....and he has not yet done so.....all he has done is announce an intent to Appeal, it will not succeed in my view. What is remarkable is that Harmer's, the Lawyers who also copped a caning from Rares will continue to act for Ashby. That is unethical, and I reckon it will be made the subject of very critical comment. According to Rares, Harmer's stuffed up professionally, they were negligent, and that has cost Ashby. Ashby could sue Harmers. So, they (Harmers and Ashby) have separate interests in the matter....their interests are not mutual. In fact, they now have conflicting interests, and thus Harmers ought no longer act for Ashby in this matter. I reckon you will hear more along those lines.Meanwhile... Ashby is appealing and going to Fair Work with his claims about Slipper..
Told you he'd appeal and it'd go further.
As for the action to be commenced at FWA....well, I really know nothing about how that beast works, apart from reading how they cocked up big time with Thomson. BUT, common sense dictates that if a Judicial Officer (Rares) has determined Ashby's cause is vexatious and an abuse of process, one would expect FWA would make exactly the same finding.
Yes, one thing is clear.......someone has very big pockets....or Ashby is getting all this assistance gratis, which makes it even more certain the whole thing is politically motivated. There ought be no doubt in anyone's mind that if Slipper was not an MHR in a delicately balanced Parliament.....no-one would give a fig about this litte prick's pathetic problems, and if he wanted them to act on his behalf in what is pretty complex stuff, he would be charged just like any other client would be. Money up front, and in the Lawyer's Trust Account.
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Ashby
Actually much of Rares' judgement was based on opinion and mind reading which unfortunately was tainted by politics.
I'd appeal it.
I'd appeal it.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Re: Ashby
Judges make decisions based on what is there before them. That is what Rares did, and it is what he is paid to do. What he says counts. What the fuckwits like Akerman, Smith, Hudson, Pickering et al is piss and wind crap, and counts for nothing in the real legal world.Rorschach wrote:Actually much of Rares' judgement was based on opinion and mind reading which unfortunately was tainted by politics.
Have you read the Judgement, Roach?
- IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: Ashby
Rares judgement was based on what Nicola Roxon had fed him.
Hopefully an appeal will keep the ALP from corrupting our legal process.
Hopefully an appeal will keep the ALP from corrupting our legal process.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Ashby
It's obvious you haven't.
No Aussie, if you read the bloody thing you will know that he made many assumptions about Brough and his involvement, this coloured his judgement. Mind you Roxon could have too, but that is just speculation. The assumptions would require him to be a mind reader for them to be able to prove them factual. (After he proves he actually is a mind reader of course)
No Aussie, if you read the bloody thing you will know that he made many assumptions about Brough and his involvement, this coloured his judgement. Mind you Roxon could have too, but that is just speculation. The assumptions would require him to be a mind reader for them to be able to prove them factual. (After he proves he actually is a mind reader of course)
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests