Ashby

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
mellie
Posts: 10231
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Ashby

Post by mellie » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:59 pm

Good to see Tony Abbott has more important things to do with his time than take the bait.

http://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/ne ... b/1692718/

So Gillard and her merry band of fellow tweeters may twitter till their hearts content, as this is what twittering twits do.

:bgrin

Aussie

Re: Ashby

Post by Aussie » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:48 pm

Got to give credit where it is due. In that Thread, Naffy talks about a Geoff and a Beowulf. What is that all about?

:WTF

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Ashby

Post by Rorschach » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:57 pm

Meanwhile... Ashby is appealing and going to Fair Work with his claims about Slipper..

Told you he'd appeal and it'd go further.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25699
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Ashby

Post by Black Orchid » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:09 pm

Aussie wrote:Got to give credit where it is due. In that Thread, Naffy talks about a Geoff and a Beowulf. What is that all about?

:WTF
Simple answer to this and in your own words too
Aussie wrote:That would be none of your business. You ought simply concern yourself with making a contribution other than one about matters which have fuck all to do with you.
;)

Aussie

Re: Ashby

Post by Aussie » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:11 pm

Meanwhile... Ashby is appealing and going to Fair Work with his claims about Slipper..

Told you he'd appeal and it'd go further.
Rares' Judgment was forensic, he carefully set out the facts as presented BY ASHBY in the Pleadings, the way the litigation was conducted, and he painstakingly set out the Law, citing relevant cases. It was a well considered, and well presented, solid and I believe, bullet proof decision. If Ashby does appeal....and he has not yet done so.....all he has done is announce an intent to Appeal, it will not succeed in my view. What is remarkable is that Harmer's, the Lawyers who also copped a caning from Rares will continue to act for Ashby. That is unethical, and I reckon it will be made the subject of very critical comment. According to Rares, Harmer's stuffed up professionally, they were negligent, and that has cost Ashby. Ashby could sue Harmers. So, they (Harmers and Ashby) have separate interests in the matter....their interests are not mutual. In fact, they now have conflicting interests, and thus Harmers ought no longer act for Ashby in this matter. I reckon you will hear more along those lines.

As for the action to be commenced at FWA....well, I really know nothing about how that beast works, apart from reading how they cocked up big time with Thomson. BUT, common sense dictates that if a Judicial Officer (Rares) has determined Ashby's cause is vexatious and an abuse of process, one would expect FWA would make exactly the same finding.

Yes, one thing is clear.......someone has very big pockets....or Ashby is getting all this assistance gratis, which makes it even more certain the whole thing is politically motivated. There ought be no doubt in anyone's mind that if Slipper was not an MHR in a delicately balanced Parliament.....no-one would give a fig about this litte prick's pathetic problems, and if he wanted them to act on his behalf in what is pretty complex stuff, he would be charged just like any other client would be. Money up front, and in the Lawyer's Trust Account.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Ashby

Post by Rorschach » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:17 pm

Actually much of Rares' judgement was based on opinion and mind reading which unfortunately was tainted by politics.

I'd appeal it.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Aussie

Re: Ashby

Post by Aussie » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:26 pm

Rorschach wrote:Actually much of Rares' judgement was based on opinion and mind reading which unfortunately was tainted by politics.
Judges make decisions based on what is there before them. That is what Rares did, and it is what he is paid to do. What he says counts. What the fuckwits like Akerman, Smith, Hudson, Pickering et al is piss and wind crap, and counts for nothing in the real legal world.

Have you read the Judgement, Roach?

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Ashby

Post by IQS.RLOW » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:30 pm

Rares judgement was based on what Nicola Roxon had fed him.

Hopefully an appeal will keep the ALP from corrupting our legal process.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Ashby

Post by Rorschach » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:31 pm

It's obvious you haven't.
No Aussie, if you read the bloody thing you will know that he made many assumptions about Brough and his involvement, this coloured his judgement. Mind you Roxon could have too, but that is just speculation. The assumptions would require him to be a mind reader for them to be able to prove them factual. (After he proves he actually is a mind reader of course) :roll
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Ashby

Post by IQS.RLOW » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:33 pm

Tainted judge...
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests