Gillard failed to curtsy

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by mellie » Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:24 pm

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... Queen.html

On this matter, I agree with many who think this was for the best.

With her cock-waddling along with it tucked between her legs, imagine if she had have curtsied for the queen, and a big sausage had have fallen out?

Not a good look!

:D

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by mantra » Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:41 pm

That's very rude Mel - I'm shocked! :o

She isn't the curtsying type and would only look clumsy if she attempted it.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by boxy » Mon Oct 24, 2011 7:56 pm

Should think herself lucky she didn't get a Liverpool kiss :P
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by mellie » Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:06 pm

I'm only joking Mantra, though you have to admit, she walks like she's got something tucked away for uncle Ron.

-Grin

And on the curtsy thingy, I think Queen Elizabeth is quite progressive, progressive enough for Jules to shake her hand and slap her on the back.

She's lucky she didn't give her a wedgy.
:laughing

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by mellie » Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:18 pm

Ok Boxy, I gotta ask, whats a Liverpool kiss?

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by boxy » Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:21 am

It's an exaggerated type of bowing :twisted:
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by mellie » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:24 am

I think Gillard prefers English carpet bowls.

Because noone likes grass between their teeth.

The Artist formerly known as Sappho

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by The Artist formerly known as Sappho » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:28 am

mellie wrote:And on the curtsy thingy, I think Queen Elizabeth is quite progressive, progressive enough for Jules to shake her hand and slap her on the back.
You think that the head of a monarchy, which that head calls 'The Firm', from a class ridden society is 'quite progressive'?

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by mellie » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:41 am

Wile E. Coyote wrote:
mellie wrote:And on the curtsy thingy, I think Queen Elizabeth is quite progressive, progressive enough for Jules to shake her hand and slap her on the back.
You think that the head of a monarchy, which that head calls 'The Firm', from a class ridden society is 'quite progressive'?

I was denoting to her 'progressive' albeit hypocritical reforms re- the order of succession to the throne, concerning gender and equality.

This and thought it might be a nice touch to put her crown where her rather large mouth is and ponder the concept of her very own husband becoming The King of Consort, this opposed to merely "Prince Phillip."

At present Queen Elizabeth II is Queen in her own right. Her husband is the Queen's consort though is not entitled to be styled King.
Though when a King succeeds to the throne, why is it his wife assumes the title of Queen?

If Queen Elizabeth wants to strive towards gender equality, this and play the gender game, then she must play fair.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_consort



Poor Charles, he misses out again.
Fancy a Camilla, Queen of the desert?

http://www.tressugar.com/Prince-William ... n-19917949 ......................:bike

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Gillard failed to curtsy

Post by mantra » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:58 am

Mel wrote:Poor Charles, he misses out again.
Fancy a Camilla, Queen of the desert?
She's so healthy - I don't think she'll retire until she's dead and by then Charles will be too old to take over. Although he doesn't seem overly keen on the job or he would have pushed his mother aside by now.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests