ETS and retarded views
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: ETS and retarded views
Do you embrace it in totality?
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: ETS and retarded views
I don't know it in totality. Obviously the 'cutting edge' of any field is going to involve 'questionable' theories.
Do you reject economic theory?
Do you reject economic theory?
- IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: ETS and retarded views
I reject the 'questionable' theories.
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: ETS and retarded views
So why do you reject the economic consensus on pricing mechanisms for greenhouse emissions? It's pretty basic stuff. Why are you so dismissive of people who understand economic theory?
- IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: ETS and retarded views
I don't reject the pricing mechanisms. I reject adopting them unilaterallySo why do you reject the economic consensus on pricing mechanisms for greenhouse emissions?
I am dismissive of those that purport to understand economic theory while applying it to another questionable theory.Why are you so dismissive of people who understand economic theory?
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: ETS and retarded views
You mean an ETS is the worst option available and a carbon tax is the next worse option.
Would you mind clarifying what you meant by this? It's from page one of this thread.
Would you mind clarifying what you meant by this? It's from page one of this thread.
- IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: ETS and retarded views
I meant that neither one will make a difference to the environment while both will be detrimental to our economy.
Are your 20 questions up yet? Do I win a prize?
Are your 20 questions up yet? Do I win a prize?
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: ETS and retarded views
Solomon, under Kyoto, if you don't meet your emissions target, you have to approach a country that has exceeded it's target and negotiate with them to 'buy' their leftover entitlement.
I meant that neither one will make a difference to the environment while both will be detrimental to our economy.
IQ, do you think this is somehow in agreeance with the economic consensus on the issue? Can you give an example of an option that will make more difference to the environment and do less damage to the economy?
I meant that neither one will make a difference to the environment while both will be detrimental to our economy.
IQ, do you think this is somehow in agreeance with the economic consensus on the issue? Can you give an example of an option that will make more difference to the environment and do less damage to the economy?
- IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: ETS and retarded views
How many have exceeded their target?- I guess SFASolomon, under Kyoto, if you don't meet your emissions target, you have to approach a country that has exceeded it's target and negotiate with them to 'buy' their leftover entitlement.
NoIQ, do you think this is somehow in agreeance with the economic consensus on the issue?
Yes- wait until the large emitters are ready to adopt a trading scheme.Can you give an example of an option that will make more difference to the environment and do less damage to the economy?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests