FYI

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
Jovial Monk

Re: FYI

Post by Jovial Monk » Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:31 pm

You made too big a deal of Mantra’s allegations. Mantra doesn’t really understand computers or the net—maybe some suspension was needed because Mantra did make too big a deal but enough is enough! Come on Aussie, you know you want to!

Aussie

Re: FYI

Post by Aussie » Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:24 pm

Ethnic wrote:
Aussie wrote:Yes, the same AiA with whom mantra shared the "Shared Puppet" account at the time she made her outrageous allegations about Admin/Team hacking that account. Ethnic, I am not going over old ground any more. Go and read the relevant Thread in the Archives.

The only thing which may lead to an abridgment of mantra's suspension is what you had the decency to do.
Who cares about shared accounts. I no longer care about sock accounts because they do no harm, if anything, they provide entertainment. So what you're saying is that someoone who has a shared account has forfeited their right to make a complaint about forum safety?

And I am sick of covering old ground but here I go again - do what the majority of the members here want and unban Mantra.
The majority? There is no evidence of that!
Who cares about shared accounts. I no longer care about sock accounts because they do no harm, if anything, they provide entertainment. So what you're saying is that someoone who has a shared account has forfeited their right to make a complaint about forum safety?
You have not read the Archives, have you. Mantra's suspension had nothing (except very indirectly) with shared accounts or socks. Mantra has every right to complain....but she has no right to make false allegations against Admin/Management that they hacked her account. Further, she was given over a week to produce the evidence she said she had. She failed to do so. The fact is, her account was not hacked, as the co-holder of that account, AiA, very early in the piece, confirmed. Did she listen? Nah. She persisted.

I think she still does.

:nah

Jovial Monk

Re: FYI

Post by Jovial Monk » Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:27 pm

Sounds a bit like you.

So you want her to apologise? Think she would do that. Then will you unban her?

Aussie

Re: FYI

Post by Aussie » Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:46 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:Sounds a bit like you.

So you want her to apologise? Think she would do that. Then will you unban her?
mantra is as free as any bird to say what she wishes about her suspension. (Having now had a look at DT's joint, I see she has had plenty to say.....even about non-existent contents of the PA Constitution.........all of which in my mind compounds with considerable aggravation, her original misconduct. She is proclivate at posting utterly false allegations concerning very important matters. Why does she do that? There is only one answer. That is, to destabalise Administration.)

But, I will on a bona fide basis, review my decision no matter what she now posts, apology or not. Nothing will change unless I hear from her and she is assured I will not take into account what she has said at DT's joint adversely to her position here. I will not administer PA on the basis of conduct elsewhere, except in the most extraordinary circumstances.

I want her to take much, much more care before she mouths off. Her posts at PA are littered with falsehoods, and I want that to stop. I want to have confidence that if I see her cry 'wolf" there really will be a wolf.

Jovial Monk

Re: FYI

Post by Jovial Monk » Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:56 pm

Ok, fair enough.

Mantra can request to rejoin here and state any problems she thinks she has with her account she should raise with you via PM (can contact me first if she likes) and not rush into public print.

Over to Mantra I think.

Aussie

Re: FYI

Post by Aussie » Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:54 pm

I have the answer, right here:
There is no way that I would beg Aussie to return there. I'll sit it out until there's a new administrator. He treats people like criminals. All I wanted to do was view the forum - nothing else. It's not as if the place is bursting at the seams and Aussie has a choice of only the brightest and best to perform tricks there.
Ya see...there she goes again with the falsehood. I do not recall asking that mantra 'beg' for anything. Truth is, I did not. This is precisely the falsehood crap I have been referring to.

Jovial Monk

Re: FYI

Post by Jovial Monk » Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:03 pm

There you go again, misreading what people say. I would think Mantra is upset at you and talks accordingly. Why don’t you try putting yourself in her shoes?

Aussie

Re: FYI

Post by Aussie » Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:09 pm

If you can show me where I asked her to beg, I'll re-instate her right now. On the other hand, when you can't......I expect you to acknowledge that it just adds depth to my position that she posts falsehoods on important issues.

Ethnic

Re: FYI

Post by Ethnic » Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:10 pm

Seriously Aussie, only you would have banned Mantra for something like this. No one else would have. And you wonder why you're despised?

'Beg' is a figure of speech. Stop being a fucking princess.

Jovial Monk

Re: FYI

Post by Jovial Monk » Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:18 pm

Yeah. Mantra has served her time FFS!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests