FYI
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Re: FYI
The majority? There is no evidence of that!Ethnic wrote:Who cares about shared accounts. I no longer care about sock accounts because they do no harm, if anything, they provide entertainment. So what you're saying is that someoone who has a shared account has forfeited their right to make a complaint about forum safety?Aussie wrote:Yes, the same AiA with whom mantra shared the "Shared Puppet" account at the time she made her outrageous allegations about Admin/Team hacking that account. Ethnic, I am not going over old ground any more. Go and read the relevant Thread in the Archives.
The only thing which may lead to an abridgment of mantra's suspension is what you had the decency to do.
And I am sick of covering old ground but here I go again - do what the majority of the members here want and unban Mantra.
You have not read the Archives, have you. Mantra's suspension had nothing (except very indirectly) with shared accounts or socks. Mantra has every right to complain....but she has no right to make false allegations against Admin/Management that they hacked her account. Further, she was given over a week to produce the evidence she said she had. She failed to do so. The fact is, her account was not hacked, as the co-holder of that account, AiA, very early in the piece, confirmed. Did she listen? Nah. She persisted.Who cares about shared accounts. I no longer care about sock accounts because they do no harm, if anything, they provide entertainment. So what you're saying is that someoone who has a shared account has forfeited their right to make a complaint about forum safety?
I think she still does.
Re: FYI
mantra is as free as any bird to say what she wishes about her suspension. (Having now had a look at DT's joint, I see she has had plenty to say.....even about non-existent contents of the PA Constitution.........all of which in my mind compounds with considerable aggravation, her original misconduct. She is proclivate at posting utterly false allegations concerning very important matters. Why does she do that? There is only one answer. That is, to destabalise Administration.)Jovial Monk wrote:Sounds a bit like you.
So you want her to apologise? Think she would do that. Then will you unban her?
But, I will on a bona fide basis, review my decision no matter what she now posts, apology or not. Nothing will change unless I hear from her and she is assured I will not take into account what she has said at DT's joint adversely to her position here. I will not administer PA on the basis of conduct elsewhere, except in the most extraordinary circumstances.
I want her to take much, much more care before she mouths off. Her posts at PA are littered with falsehoods, and I want that to stop. I want to have confidence that if I see her cry 'wolf" there really will be a wolf.
Re: FYI
I have the answer, right here:
Ya see...there she goes again with the falsehood. I do not recall asking that mantra 'beg' for anything. Truth is, I did not. This is precisely the falsehood crap I have been referring to.There is no way that I would beg Aussie to return there. I'll sit it out until there's a new administrator. He treats people like criminals. All I wanted to do was view the forum - nothing else. It's not as if the place is bursting at the seams and Aussie has a choice of only the brightest and best to perform tricks there.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests