J.W. Frogen wrote:boxy wrote:As to Jesus, seems like a good natured lunatic to me
What better way to spend a Sunday than with a good natured lunatic?
Thats what your wife said when she was blowing me on Monday
J.W. Frogen wrote:boxy wrote:As to Jesus, seems like a good natured lunatic to me
What better way to spend a Sunday than with a good natured lunatic?
You should ask pierre. He knows all about the 'altered state of consciousness,' first hand. He has never suggested the 'breakthrough' was permanent, as he was, after all, on a budget. He will agree that it was 'sudden', and also disturbing in it's lack of final definition.AiA in Atlanta wrote:While memetics is useful for explaining much in our world, it is inadequate to explain the handful of individuals who have had a sudden and permanent breakthrough in consciousness.
Ned Kelly wrote:You should ask pierre. He knows all about the 'altered state of consciousness,' first hand. He has never suggested the 'breakthrough' was permanent, as he was, after all, on a budget. He will agree that it was 'sudden', and also disturbing in it's lack of final definition.AiA in Atlanta wrote:While memetics is useful for explaining much in our world, it is inadequate to explain the handful of individuals who have had a sudden and permanent breakthrough in consciousness.
I think he might be the Deli Lama.
Oh, I made a mistake. Sorry, AiA. pierre is one of those who have no recognition here.
There ya go. I've fixed yer stuff up.What in God's name are you blathering about?
Loaded question. One would have to first explain what "objectively real" and an "awakened state of human consciousness" is.AiA in Atlanta wrote:"Are all great spiritual teachers of history liars, lunatics, or liaisons to an objectively real and attainable awakened state of human consciousness?"
Before you answer, consider this:
If you answer "they're all liars," what larger worldview is supported by this belief? Is there a grand conspiracy out there with shady individuals inventing false stories to gain social advantage of the naive?
If you think they are nuts, then are these glimpses into reality a psychotic episode, mental breakdowns? Answering "Yes!" here supports a worldview in which "sanity" is defined by adherence to the mental norm and the social status quo.
What if enlightenment is real? If you answered "Yes" then why make anything more important than awakening to enlightenment?
Examples of the type of people you are talking about?AiA in Atlanta wrote:While memetics is useful for explaining much in our world, it is inadequate to explain the handful of individuals who have had a sudden and permanent breakthrough in consciousness.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests