Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
- Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
I would like to suggest an Amendment to the PA Constitution
Petitions
Petitions may only be proposed by members who have been active PA members for the last twelve months and have full access for that period. This rule applies to all signatories of that petition.
Further more members who have had two or more bannings in that twelve month period may not vote in petitions
Petitions
Petitions may only be proposed by members who have been active PA members for the last twelve months and have full access for that period. This rule applies to all signatories of that petition.
Further more members who have had two or more bannings in that twelve month period may not vote in petitions
- Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
Comments/suggestions welcome!
Re bannings perhaps three or more!
Re bannings perhaps three or more!
-
- Posts: 2620
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:50 pm
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
It's kind of a moot point if nobody is here. Something should be done to attract the right kind of posters. I have no idea what that something is, but that's what is needed.
- Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
Freediver I have been in discussion with Bobby and BO about the need to tighten up the conditions regarding Petitions in the PA Constitution, which prompted this topic.
can you please confirm how we would go about amending the constitution?
Does it require more than a request from the EL to you to amend it if you agree with amendment?
can you please confirm how we would go about amending the constitution?
Does it require more than a request from the EL to you to amend it if you agree with amendment?
- Nom De Plume
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:18 pm
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
NO!Redneck wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 9:58 amI would like to suggest an Amendment to the PA Constitution
Petitions
Petitions may only be proposed by members who have been active PA members for the last twelve months and have full access for that period. This rule applies to all signatories of that petition.
Further more members who have had two or more bannings in that twelve month period may not vote in petitions
You sound like a Republican trying to fix the next election in so that noobs who were once members will have less influence.
"But you will run your kunt mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- Nom De Plume
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:18 pm
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
Agreed. BO failed on that score. Now it's Bob's turn to fix it. Perhaps BO, Bob or should focus on that!
"But you will run your kunt mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
To some degree yes, but just ensuring that new members (regardless of who) cant try and overthrow the EL until they have been a well a behaved member for 12 months. With the secret number only being 4 in the last election due to low numbers of voters this is not beyond the realms of possibilityNom De Plume wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:01 pmNO!Redneck wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 9:58 amI would like to suggest an Amendment to the PA Constitution
Petitions
Petitions may only be proposed by members who have been active PA members for the last twelve months and have full access for that period. This rule applies to all signatories of that petition.
Further more members who have had two or more bannings in that twelve month period may not vote in petitions
You sound like a Republican trying to fix the next election in so that noobs who were once members will have less influence.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25685
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
I've done my bit. I brought plenty of people here (none of them from OzPol) who wrote long and well thought out posts and thrived on non-abusive discussion. Just off the top of my head there's Bogan, The4thEstate, Nicole, BigP, Neverforget711, Phoenix, Texan, Billy and others. Most didn't like the ad homs and abuse they received from their opposition and left which is why I tried to keep that idiocy out of the main threads and made the Playground.Nom De Plume wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:06 pmAgreed. BO failed on that score. Now it's Bob's turn to fix it. Perhaps BO, Bob or should focus on that!
Perhaps it should be more up to the members to act like adults and "fix it" instead of just always bitching.
Who else has brought anyone here from anywhere other than OzPol? No-one in my time.
- Bobby
- Posts: 18229
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
Black Orchid wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 2:16 pmI've done my bit. I brought plenty of people here who wrote long and thought out posts and thrived on non-abusive discussion. Just off the top of my head there was Bogan, The4thEstte, Nicole, Neverforget711, Phoenix and others. Most didn't like the ad homs and abuse they received from their opposition and left which is why I tried to keep that idiocy out of the main threads and made the Playground.Nom De Plume wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:06 pmAgreed. BO failed on that score. Now it's Bob's turn to fix it. Perhaps BO, Bob or should focus on that!
Perhaps it should be more up to the members to act like adults and "fix it."
Thanks BO,
the problem is that it's possible that new members could:
(1) drive away existing or other new members with abusive posts.
(2) cause trouble by making petitions to remove other members or the EL or Mods.
I feel that a probationary period for new members is the immediate answer
as outlined in my election Manifesto.
The question is -Anyone will be allowed to join up to PA but
new members will be on a good behaviour bond for the first 3 months.
After that time most new members will be allowed access to Sparta.
would that be enough?
- Redneck
- Posts: 6275
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
Re: Proposed Amendment to the PA Constitution
No I dont think so as you cant stop them making petitions without amending the Constitution.Bobby wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 2:56 pmBlack Orchid wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 2:16 pmI've done my bit. I brought plenty of people here who wrote long and thought out posts and thrived on non-abusive discussion. Just off the top of my head there was Bogan, The4thEstte, Nicole, Neverforget711, Phoenix and others. Most didn't like the ad homs and abuse they received from their opposition and left which is why I tried to keep that idiocy out of the main threads and made the Playground.Nom De Plume wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:06 pmAgreed. BO failed on that score. Now it's Bob's turn to fix it. Perhaps BO, Bob or should focus on that!
Perhaps it should be more up to the members to act like adults and "fix it."
Thanks BO,
the problem is that it's possible that new members could:
(1) drive away existing or other new members with abusive posts.
(2) cause trouble by making petitions to remove other members or the EL or Mods.
I feel that a probationary period for new members is the immediate answer
as outlined in my election Manifesto.
The question is -Anyone will be allowed to join up to PA but
new members will be on a good behaviour bond for the first 3 months.
After that time most new members will be allowed access to Sparta.
would that be enough?
Three months isnt long enough 12 months good behaviour before being able to petition .
Sparta.... three months is probably OK as there is SFA of interest in there anyway.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests