Swan laughing stock at G20
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
It's spelled "Liebor"
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
Wayne Swan is that guy you hate at work. He sucks up to the Boss. When the eventual "change" comes, Wayne is still sucking up to the Boss. Ineffectual prick.
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
when u pull ur head out of your arse you might understand that the voters decide who will be PM. the labor party only decide who will be the parliamentary leader. its simple to understand. if the voters dont vote for the labor party the leader does not become the PM. so you could try again to answer this questionpierre wrote:The Labour Party decided the PM after being elected in 2007. Did you fill in a ballot for PM ? I must have missed it. Maybe it was the green one.
who decided who would be prime minister on 24 November 2007
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
It's a representative democracy. We elect the local member, those local members decide which party has the numbers to rule, and the party decides who to put forward to the Queen's representative to become our Prime Minister.
Direct democracies like the US directly elect their leaders via an open election, we don't.
Direct democracies like the US directly elect their leaders via an open election, we don't.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
boxy wrote:It's a representative democracy. We elect the local member, those local members decide which party has the numbers to rule, and the party decides who to put forward to the Queen's representative to become our Prime Minister.
Direct democracies like the US directly elect their leaders via an open election, we don't.
when u pull ur head out of your arse you might understand that the voters decide who will be PM. the labor party only decide who will be the parliamentary leader. its simple to understand. if the voters dont vote for the labor party the leader does not become the PM. so you could try again to answer this question
who decided who would be prime minister on 24 November 2007
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2f37/b2f374a6e5286029356d607dd92879bac6591674" alt="Laughing :lol:"
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
- IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
You can't honestly laugh when the polls all have a preferred PM and news bites from the head ministers all come out and say "Kev will lead us to the next election" a day before he is tossed out with last night chicken roast from parliament house cafeteria?boxy wrote:
If people don't vote for the PM, why did Labor change nothing but their PM?
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
punk wrote:
who decided who would be prime minister on 24 November 2007
i'll try to make it simple for u fluffy bunny as u cant answer without help. who was prime minister on 23 november 2007 (hint john howard), who was prime minister on 25 november 2007 (hint kevin rudd), what happened on 24 november 2007 to change the prime minister (hint a general election).boxy wrote:
who decided who would be prime minister on 24 November 2007
- Swami Dring
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:05 pm
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
Conviction is for idiots and the religious. The scientific mind remains open.IQSRLOW wrote:If your Labor, you don't even keep him for a term.We don't directly elect our Prime Minister.
It must be hell being a convictionless, poll driven party. I'm surprised Labor hasn't tried to nationalise Newspoll or Neilsen
Mankind will not be free until the last king is strangled with the guts of the last priest
- IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Swan laughing stock at G20
Politics has nothing to do with science so...your point?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests