Next Up: Black Orchid
Black Orchid wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:27 pm
I'm straight forward and say what I think so please don't misrepresent what I say. I didn't hear what Trump said about 9/11 so I am not going to comment. Trump has his bad side and many foibles and I doubt anyone has denied otherwise and he's certainly lost the plot recently. He has also done a great deal of good for the American people whilst thumbing the establishment and that is what I have addressed in his favour in the past. Less tax, much better conditions for veterans, bringing the troops home and brokering several ME peace deals just for starters. The list goes on and on and there is a thread here by Sprint, I think, with it all listed.
This is neat... but totally irrelevant. Nowhere does this address anything I asked. Also, as I will go into more detail on later, I have no obligation to find your own sources for you.
Black Orchid wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:27 pm
I'm the only one here who has responded to you at length so accusing me of ad hom is disingenuous and, yes, I do know what it means and I'm also not ready for the old folks home just yet thank you very much. I might be bad at my job, as you say, but I did take the time to respond to you with more than just a short sentence or two
Yes you responded with the most words... but still no actual content. No sources, no focus, no nothing. Even if you had, Ad hom is still Ad Hom so I don't think your defence holds much water.
For reference, I only started sprinkling in insults
after you had opened the floodgates. I welcome whatever insult you can think of, but the ones listed below are all tired and boring, much like their author.
Black Orchid wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 10:04 am
subservient little dolt...
You are hypocritical to the enth...
In your dark little cave in mummy's basement?...
Black Orchid wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:27 pm
There are lots of threads here covering all the points you have made. Scroll through them and see if there is anything you wish to address there. Sources are all provided in the relevant threads. Politics moves quickly as do the threads. I honestly don't have the time to go through all those threads to re-source.
No. YOU make a claim? YOU provide sources. Not me, not anyone else. YOU.
If you don't have time to respond properly, with sources, than you don't have time to respond at all. Unless you have the brain power to make ontological arguments (you don't) than a source is a requirement for any claim made. I made a point of removing every source from my last post specifically to demonstrate how difficult it can be to have reasoned conversation without it. I now realise there wasn't any point to that demonstration, because you never tried to engage with my arguments anyways, and probably never will.
Black Orchid wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:27 pm
I'm not a mind reader so I don't know what motivates people to violence but I will say that there is NO justification for violence from either side.
Perhaps one of the Americans here can address your points more to your satisfaction. Being new I'd do my best to be at least a little bit polite to them though.
Here you openly admit you can't address my points... ok. And yes I do promise to play nicely with anyone who didn't insult me first. I tell you what, if you apologise to me for the insults you made, and promise not to insult me again, I won't say anything mean about you ever again either.
In fact, what you've said tehre is a bold faced lie when you've openly defended right wing vioence at the capital
Now that's what's called a
bald faced lie.
[/quote]
Wow thanks for correcting my spelling, you rerally engaged with the core of my argument there. Also, does it feel bad when someone misrepresents you and your points? Because again, BO, I knew what I was doing. I was proving how annoying it is to argue against you when you do that exact same thing. Below is what you have said about me, a member who has not commented on any of these issues, as if you knew me personally. You, BO, are a hypocrite.
Black Orchid wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 10:04 am
People do care what is right or wrong but what I find astoundingly hypocritical is the way your side turns a blind eye to the past 4 years of calls to violence by many Democratic officials. That's apparently ok but when there is push-back (which was always going to be inevitable) you hide behind your blinkers with your faux outrage.
Seattle, Michigan, Portland are still the epicentres of extreme violence, burning and looting by the left nightly a year on and it is being ignored by the MSM. They control the narrative and you swallow it like a subservient little dolt.
I strongly condemn violence from all sides but you and your ilk have been silent this past year while cities were destroyed and livelihoods lost. You are hypocritical to the enth. Where were you with your faux outrage these past 4 years when Democrats like Maxine Waters, Chuck Schumer, Ted Lieu, James Clapper, Cory Booker, Eric Holder, Joachin Castro etc have been calling for and endorsing violence against Trump supporters? In your dark little cave in mummy's basement?
I'm gonna wrap up this response by once again asking you PLEASE actually look at my arguments and respond to them in their entirity, not small sections out of context, not spelling mistakes, but the actual point I make. It's clear you disagree with me, but I don't know why.