This folder contains Archived threads.
-
Ned Kelly
Post
by Ned Kelly » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:05 pm
Ned Kelly wrote:Well, Boxy, you are the exalted one. How does the voting work? Is it a yes/no thing as you said, or is it a ........ take what freeloader has on offer, or come up with your own?
Remember, Boxy, you are there as duly elected Secretary of freeloader to serve the Members. So, serve. Explain this dichotomy, and soon, wot. Your deadline approaches.
Bump for boxy.
So, boxy, what's the go here? How do the votes work?
-
TomB
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:04 pm
Post
by TomB » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:30 pm
You vote, you lose!
-
Ned Kelly
Post
by Ned Kelly » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:43 pm
So, boxy, what's the go here? How do the votes work?
-
boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Post
by boxy » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:46 pm
Yes = update the constitution as stated in the OP.
No = stick with what we have, warts'n'all.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
-
freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by freediver » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:46 pm
So you are Aussie?
-
Ned Kelly
Post
by Ned Kelly » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:51 pm
boxy wrote:Yes = update the constitution as stated in the OP.
No = stick with what we have, warts'n'all.
So, what does this mean.....from freeloader???
Unfortunately you can't vote no to the current one. You have to replace it with an alternative.
Is that a fist up your arse, boxy?
Explain what is the go? What does a 'no' vote mean?
-
IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Post
by IQSRLOW » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:52 pm
Yes he is.
Arrsie just can't stay away even though he gave his farewell earlier.
He, like Monky boy has trouble with self control
-
freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by freediver » Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:04 pm
Aussie, boxy is playing hard to get, unlike you who used to come begging for me to press your buttons and turn your knobs.
If you want a third option, you need to have another vote. There are only two options here.
-
annielaurie
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:07 am
Post
by annielaurie » Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:00 pm
boxy wrote:
Yes = update the constitution as stated in the OP.
No = stick with what we have, warts' n' all.
Well we can't leave the thing the way it is, the updated version has to be better than that. So I vote yes.
.
-
Maxine
Post
by Maxine » Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:34 pm
Oh no dear little sister! There is a third option--vote no and work can begin on working out a much simpler, clearer, user-friendly version! Trying to update the heap pf crap that is the constitution now is pointless!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests