New virus from shithole China

[Redneck]

Diamond Princess cruise ship reports dozens of new coronavirus cases
Updated 7 minutes ago

Forty-one new coronavirus infections have been confirmed on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship docked at Yokohama, according to Japan’s health ministry.

It brings the total number of confirmed cases on board to 61.

There are 3,700 people on board the ship which is under a two-week quarantine period.

More to come.

Source: ABC more to come

[Nom De Plume]

Incorrect...
There will be no apology fuckwit....

You were wrong so apologise.

And don't swear at me.

Im not wrong...you wish to denigrate me by calling me silly billy and then you hypocritically
demand that I not swear at you...fuck off..this conversation is terminated.....
Do some research and get your facts straight before you argue on a topic...

You said

Hopefully they will discover "force majeure" will guarantee them a refund.....


That is wrong.
The insurance companies will get out of paying
by claiming force majeure.

Apologise you obnoxious prick.

Get your head around this fuckwit...
Passenger pays for trip to China
Corona virus becomes "apparent"
Passenger cancels flight due to corona virus fears.
Airline refuses to refund fares.
Passenger sues airline, claiming force majeure allows him to rescind contract.
Airline joins insurance company as co defendant, as insurance company claims force majeure
rescinds their contract with airline to cover cancellations...presuming their contract has a force
majeure clause inserted therein....
Court finds in favour of passenger as virus is classified as "unforeseeable circumstance" and rescinds
contract between passenger and airline.
Another example is where A contracts with B to purchase goods.
The goods have to be shipped from overseas.
The goods are destroyed by storm.
Both A and B know that there is a possibility of storm.
A/B insures the goods with insurance company C.
There is no force majeure clause within the contract, otherwise, if the goods are destroyed at sea,
A/B loses everything.
This is why advice is given not to include force majeure clauses in some contracts.
If A contracts to buy a house from B and before contracts are exchanged, the house is destroyed by fire/flood/tornado
The contract cannot be enforced as there is no house to sell/buy.
The contract is rescinded due to the doctrine of frustration.
The buyer cant even sue for specific performance...
Do you understand the difference between the doctrine of frustration and the doctrine of force majeure and the
doctrine of specific performance....
I think you understand sweet fuck all.....

You remind me of a former original PA member called Cynic. He was a lawyer, I think, and would often piss off Aussie... a former member.
Cynic was a cool dude.

@ Bobby... I checked my old text books and he seems to know his shit... I think you owe him an apology!

[Bobby]

You were wrong so apologise.

And don't swear at me.

Im not wrong...you wish to denigrate me by calling me silly billy and then you hypocritically
demand that I not swear at you...fuck off..this conversation is terminated.....
Do some research and get your facts straight before you argue on a topic...

You said

Hopefully they will discover "force majeure" will guarantee them a refund.....


That is wrong.
The insurance companies will get out of paying
by claiming force majeure.

Apologise you obnoxious prick.

Get your head around this fuckwit...
Passenger pays for trip to China
Corona virus becomes "apparent"
Passenger cancels flight due to corona virus fears.
Airline refuses to refund fares.
Passenger sues airline, claiming force majeure allows him to rescind contract.
Airline joins insurance company as co defendant, as insurance company claims force majeure
rescinds their contract with airline to cover cancellations...presuming their contract has a force
majeure clause inserted therein....
Court finds in favour of passenger as virus is classified as "unforeseeable circumstance" and rescinds
contract between passenger and airline.
Another example is where A contracts with B to purchase goods.
The goods have to be shipped from overseas.
The goods are destroyed by storm.
Both A and B know that there is a possibility of storm.
A/B insures the goods with insurance company C.
There is no force majeure clause within the contract, otherwise, if the goods are destroyed at sea,
A/B loses everything.
This is why advice is given not to include force majeure clauses in some contracts.
If A contracts to buy a house from B and before contracts are exchanged, the house is destroyed by fire/flood/tornado
The contract cannot be enforced as there is no house to sell/buy.
The contract is rescinded due to the doctrine of frustration.
The buyer cant even sue for specific performance...
Do you understand the difference between the doctrine of frustration and the doctrine of force majeure and the
doctrine of specific performance....
I think you understand sweet fuck all.....

You remind me of a former original PA member called Cynic. He was a lawyer, I think, and would often piss off Aussie... a former member.
Cynic was a cool dude.

@ Bobby... I checked my old text books and he seems to know his shit... I think you owe him an apology!

Bullshit,
I've read countless insurance contracts and they
always have a force majeure get out clause.

Silly Billy is forgiven

namaste

[The Reboot]

Bobby's not the brightest tool in the shed.

Oh look, an article praising China's "quick response". I call fake news.

Early Detection Is Key to Combating the Spread of Coronavirus

he epidemic of a new coronavirus is a stark reminder of the threat infectious diseases pose, but there’s one encouraging development. Within weeks of the virus’s being reported, scientists in China quickly isolated and sequenced the virus and shared the data with the international research community, accelerating global efforts to develop diagnostics, vaccines and therapies.

The world got a head start because the Chinese scientific community had a robust disease-monitoring network in place to detect emerging flu strains, and had experienced SARS.

This wasn’t the case with the Ebola virus epidemic that ravaged West Africa from 2014 to 2016. The world wasn’t looking. By the time the virus was detected, it had already been circulating for months. The same holds true for the Zika virus, which we now believe was circulating in South America for more than a year before being detected.

Viruses have a molecular “clock” that allows us to estimate when they first jumped to humans or entered a particular human population–genomics’ version of carbon dating. Based on the limited initial genetic diversity seen in the 2019-nCoV genome, we believe that scientists in China detected this outbreak within weeks of its start.

That speed of detection is unprecedented and crucial. Time is of the essence when it comes to responding to outbreaks. For Ebola and SARS, too much time had passed: the viruses mutated and became potentially more dangerous.

All three recent outbreaks demonstrate the power of genomics in guiding our response to these emerging threats. Current genomics technologies can tell us about the virus’s origins, spread and underlying biology. They also make it possible to have working diagnostics shared around the world within days.

But we need to leverage these genomic tools and dramatically increase our capabilities. China achieved near real-time response because it had the infrastructure in place; most countries in the Global South, which are disproportionately impacted by viral outbreaks, do not. Most countries and most U.S. states still do not have the capability to detect 2019-nCoV on-site.

The 2019-nCoV epidemic not only underscores the need to increase our investment in genomics, diagnostics and information technology, but also the importance of incorporating them into our routine health practices.

We’re still a long way from controlling 2019-nCoV, and a painful human toll may still lie ahead. And while the world pays close attention to 2019-nCoV, around 100 or more other outbreaks are reported every year, and Ebola is still devastating the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Let’s hope that we all learn from this experience to build the worldwide systems we need to react quickly, no matter the threat.

Source

[brian ross]

Bobby's not the brightest tool in the shed.

Oh look, an article praising China's "quick response". I call fake news.

Neither are you. I make excuses for your idiocy. I know I shouldn't but hey, your young and foolish.

[Bobby]

The Corona virus.
There's plenty of evidence that it's man made - a bio weapon.
The virus has 4 parts spliced into it that came straight from the AIDS virus.
It destroys your T cells - immune system.
What you're not being told is that the people in hospitals are being
given anti-viral, AIDS type medications.

Why does that work?
Answer - this virus is similar to AIDS.

What's the problem?
What if they run out of those expensive drugs?
Then the death toll my rise exponentially.

The media say the death toll is only 2% but don't tell you the reason why -
it's the rare and expensive anti-viral drugs that they're using.

You only found out about it because of me.
Stay tuned folks.

[brian ross]

It is not a bioweapon, Bobby.

[Bobby]

It is not a bioweapon, Bobby.

Wait till the hospitals run out of expensive, AIDS, anti-viral drugs then
you'll see the real death rate.
Will you then apologise to me?

[billy the kid]

It is not a bioweapon, Bobby.

Wait till the hospitals run out of expensive, AIDS, anti-viral drugs then
you'll see the real death rate.
Will you then apologise to me?

We all have to realise that brian ross (aka the resident moron, aka the voice of reason ..his own description)
knows everything about everything....he tells us often enough...so he must be right....
AND besides, the resident moron has a sister who is a scientist...she says its not a bioweapon...
She/he must be right then...
Of course its a bioweapon...
Im still waiting on Australian scientists who state that they have duplicated the virus and discovered a vaccine
to tell us what the properties of the virus actually are....cant they tell us this or will the government hush
this up, as we don't want to offend China by announcing that it is a bioweapon.
I have posted numerous links on my other thread which show conclusively that this is a bioweapon.
Only morons like brian ross want to insist that its not....
Blind freddie can see that the Chinese are "catching" the virus in their thousands...
Why would they quarantine a city of 11 million...
Bobby is correct when he asks the question "what happens when they run out of AIDS anti viral drugs..."
Why pray tell is an AIDS drug needed to cure a simple old bat flu virus....

[Bobby]

It is not a bioweapon, Bobby.

Wait till the hospitals run out of expensive, AIDS, anti-viral drugs then
you'll see the real death rate.
Will you then apologise to me?

We all have to realise that brian ross (aka the resident moron, aka the voice of reason ..his own description)
knows everything about everything....he tells us often enough...so he must be right....
AND besides, the resident moron has a sister who is a scientist...she says its not a bioweapon...
She/he must be right then...
Of course its a bioweapon...
Im still waiting on Australian scientists who state that they have duplicated the virus and discovered a vaccine
to tell us what the properties of the virus actually are....cant they tell us this or will the government hush
this up, as we don't want to offend China by announcing that it is a bioweapon.
I have posted numerous links on my other thread which show conclusively that this is a bioweapon.
Only morons like brian ross want to insist that its not....
Blind freddie can see that the Chinese are "catching" the virus in their thousands...
Why would they quarantine a city of 11 million...
Bobby is correct when he asks the question "what happens when they run out of AIDS anti viral drugs..."
Why pray tell is an AIDS drug needed to cure a simple old bat flu virus....

Hi Billy,
The politicians have most likely stockpiled the special
anti-viral drugs for themselves.
They are not telling us that there won't be enough for all of us.

The countries that can produce those drugs quickly will survive -
we may not in Australia.