Greta Thunberg

[Nom De Plume]

Per capita we’re the second largest producer of emissions in the world.

And many down the list are either third world shite holes or so overpopulated that they are killing the world with ever expanding population growth.

Population growth will destroy the planet before climate change, and is a primary contributor to climate pollution.

That I do agree with. But what’s the solution?

Sodium fluoroacetata, 1080 ?

Offer it as gluten and cruelty free so that you target the right audience.

[sprintcyclist]

Thanks Nom de Plume,

One has to think laterally at times.

[The4thEstate]

Per capita we’re the second largest producer of emissions in the world.

Why should we give a crap about per capita carbon emissions? For devout worshipers in the Holy Temple of Climate Change, total emissions are the statistic that should count more than any other.

I mean, does anybody think the planet is really happy that China, whose 9 billion tons of emissions are nearly twice that of the second-place U.S. (5 billion tons), "only" emits 6.59 tons per capita, while scowling at Australia, which emits 381 million tons BUT has a per capita rate of nearly 16?
http://worldpopulationreview.com/countr ... y-country/

That's as silly as saying a major manufacturing plant that dumps 500 gallons of toxic waste into the river is less of an environmental villain than a 2-person camping party that relieves themselves on the river bank ... because gosh, when you consider that the manufacturing plant has 1,000 employees, the plant dumps fewer toxins per capita!

[The4thEstate]

*Yawn*

Yeah, I felt the same way about your copout response to my previous post ...

[Neferti]

Those on the bandwagon should get off before it crashes into something .....

[Black Orchid]

Per capita we’re the second largest producer of emissions in the world.

Why should we give a crap about per capita carbon emissions? For devout worshipers in the Holy Temple of Climate Change, total emissions are the statistic that should count more than any other.

I mean, does anybody think the planet is really happy that China, whose 9 billion tons of emissions are nearly twice that of the second-place U.S. (5 billion tons), "only" emits 6.59 tons per capita, while scowling at Australia, which emits 381 million tons BUT has a per capita rate of nearly 16?
http://worldpopulationreview.com/countr ... y-country/

That's as silly as saying a major manufacturing plant that dumps 500 gallons of toxic waste into the river is less of an environmental villain than a 2-person camping party that relieves themselves on the river bank ... because gosh, when you consider that the manufacturing plant has 1,000 employees, the plant dumps fewer toxins per capita!

The claim was false anyway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... per_capita

[brian ross]

‘Generation Greta’: Angry youths put heat on climate talks

[Bogan]

z2022.png

The National Socialists in Germany knew how to brainwash the kids too, Briney.

[Bogan]

z2023.png

So did the International Socialists in the USSR.

If your ideology, stinks, you can still indoctrinate the kids. They can be taught to believe anything.

[Bogan]

China's carbon dioxide emissions is about 10 million tonnes and it is increasing at an alarming rate. The USA is about 5 million tons and it is declining. But who does Brian Ross and the rest of the Alarmists despise? Donald Trump, of course.