whales

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: whales

Post by freediver » Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:19 pm

How many blues did the Japs slaughter last year?

Did you know that the black striped Wallaby is also endangered? Yet you have the nerve to eat roo meat.

Auzgurl

Re: whales

Post by Auzgurl » Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:44 pm

Whales roam the oceans of the world..are hunted by more than just one country..whales know no bounderies..know no danger zones, so therfore are more vulnerable .

They're numbers ( blue whales ) have fallen alarmingly and how do we save the blue whale once numbers drop so low that there are not enough in number to sustain theyre own populations..put them is a zoo , clone them?

Do you have proof perfect that they dont kill blue whales?

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: whales

Post by freediver » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:05 pm

Actually they are less vulnerable than most marine animals because it is far easier to gauge their numbers.

You can't prove a negative.

Auzgurl

Re: whales

Post by Auzgurl » Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:20 pm

freediver wrote:Actually they are less vulnerable than most marine animals because it is far easier to gauge their numbers.
If you say so..and even if that were true, having the knowledge is no good if we just sit and watch but dont change anything. How did the blue whale population drop to less than 3% without at least some intervention...alert?
You can't prove a negative.

Sometimes you actually can..and I could not see the Japs saying 'oh look, theres a blue whale..no dont even think about it.." Not likely.

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: whales

Post by freediver » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:08 pm

If you say so
Yes I do. Have you ever seen someone standing a headland counting bream as they swim past?
having the knowledge is no good if we just sit and watch but dont change anything
But we are. We have gone way overboard infact. The whalers themselves set up the IWC and agreed to a moratorium. Then the deluded hippies and animal libbers took over and decided nothing would ever change.
Sometimes you actually can..and I could not see the Japs saying 'oh look, theres a blue whale..no dont even think about it.." Not likely.
Can you tell that by their slanty eyes?

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: whales

Post by boxy » Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:15 pm

I wouldn't be surprised if environmental factors are more responsible than modern day hunting.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Auzgurl

Re: whales

Post by Auzgurl » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:59 am

boxy wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if environmental factors are more responsible than modern day hunting.
Most likely boxy Im sure..

And FD
But we are. We have gone way overboard infact. The whalers themselves set up the IWC and agreed to a moratorium. Then the deluded hippies and animal libbers took over and decided nothing would ever change.
Why do you refer to anyone who gives a stuff about animals/trees/anything environmental as hippies ( as if its an insult almost .. I think 'hippies' give a shit no matter how deluded some may see them and before you ask or assume, I am NOT a hippie..just tired of the insults thrown around in their name)
Whats with the 'we' do you yourself have a part in the IWC or the moratorium thats the whalers have set up?

That would be interesting to know.

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: whales

Post by freediver » Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:28 pm

Why do you refer to anyone who gives a stuff about animals/trees/anything environmental as hippies
I don't. I care about the environment. That's why I promote sustainable food sources, like whales. I usually throw the term hippy around for people who don't think things through.
Whats with the 'we'
I meant Australia.

Auzgurl

Re: whales

Post by Auzgurl » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:31 pm

freediver wrote:
Why do you refer to anyone who gives a stuff about animals/trees/anything environmental as hippies
I don't. I care about the environment. That's why I promote sustainable food sources, like whales. I usually throw the term hippy around for people who don't think things through.
Yes I know you care about the environment FD, but argueing for whales to be used a sustainable source is going to elicit some prickly responses ..even if you are right..try argueing the same thing for a cute koala ?

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: whales

Post by freediver » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:45 pm

There's not much meat on a koala. Plus, people's pet dogs do a more than good enough job of keeping their numbers down.

I do however promote the harvest of possums, especially brushtails. I think it is actually illegal in most states. By harvesting possums, we would get a sustainable soruce of meat right at our front doorsteps, we would be able to grow a lot more food in our own backyards, and there would be a lot more birds around. Brushtails are in far higher than normal numbers do to suburbia etc, and their high numbers upsets the balance of nature, especially when they go round eating bird eggs.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests