whales
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: whales
How many blues did the Japs slaughter last year?
Did you know that the black striped Wallaby is also endangered? Yet you have the nerve to eat roo meat.
Did you know that the black striped Wallaby is also endangered? Yet you have the nerve to eat roo meat.
Re: whales
Whales roam the oceans of the world..are hunted by more than just one country..whales know no bounderies..know no danger zones, so therfore are more vulnerable .
They're numbers ( blue whales ) have fallen alarmingly and how do we save the blue whale once numbers drop so low that there are not enough in number to sustain theyre own populations..put them is a zoo , clone them?
Do you have proof perfect that they dont kill blue whales?
They're numbers ( blue whales ) have fallen alarmingly and how do we save the blue whale once numbers drop so low that there are not enough in number to sustain theyre own populations..put them is a zoo , clone them?
Do you have proof perfect that they dont kill blue whales?
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: whales
Actually they are less vulnerable than most marine animals because it is far easier to gauge their numbers.
You can't prove a negative.
You can't prove a negative.
Re: whales
If you say so..and even if that were true, having the knowledge is no good if we just sit and watch but dont change anything. How did the blue whale population drop to less than 3% without at least some intervention...alert?freediver wrote:Actually they are less vulnerable than most marine animals because it is far easier to gauge their numbers.
You can't prove a negative.
Sometimes you actually can..and I could not see the Japs saying 'oh look, theres a blue whale..no dont even think about it.." Not likely.
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: whales
Yes I do. Have you ever seen someone standing a headland counting bream as they swim past?If you say so
But we are. We have gone way overboard infact. The whalers themselves set up the IWC and agreed to a moratorium. Then the deluded hippies and animal libbers took over and decided nothing would ever change.having the knowledge is no good if we just sit and watch but dont change anything
Can you tell that by their slanty eyes?Sometimes you actually can..and I could not see the Japs saying 'oh look, theres a blue whale..no dont even think about it.." Not likely.
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: whales
I wouldn't be surprised if environmental factors are more responsible than modern day hunting.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
Re: whales
Most likely boxy Im sure..boxy wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if environmental factors are more responsible than modern day hunting.
And FD
Why do you refer to anyone who gives a stuff about animals/trees/anything environmental as hippies ( as if its an insult almost .. I think 'hippies' give a shit no matter how deluded some may see them and before you ask or assume, I am NOT a hippie..just tired of the insults thrown around in their name)But we are. We have gone way overboard infact. The whalers themselves set up the IWC and agreed to a moratorium. Then the deluded hippies and animal libbers took over and decided nothing would ever change.
Whats with the 'we' do you yourself have a part in the IWC or the moratorium thats the whalers have set up?
That would be interesting to know.
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: whales
I don't. I care about the environment. That's why I promote sustainable food sources, like whales. I usually throw the term hippy around for people who don't think things through.Why do you refer to anyone who gives a stuff about animals/trees/anything environmental as hippies
I meant Australia.Whats with the 'we'
Re: whales
Yes I know you care about the environment FD, but argueing for whales to be used a sustainable source is going to elicit some prickly responses ..even if you are right..try argueing the same thing for a cute koala ?freediver wrote:I don't. I care about the environment. That's why I promote sustainable food sources, like whales. I usually throw the term hippy around for people who don't think things through.Why do you refer to anyone who gives a stuff about animals/trees/anything environmental as hippies
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: whales
There's not much meat on a koala. Plus, people's pet dogs do a more than good enough job of keeping their numbers down.
I do however promote the harvest of possums, especially brushtails. I think it is actually illegal in most states. By harvesting possums, we would get a sustainable soruce of meat right at our front doorsteps, we would be able to grow a lot more food in our own backyards, and there would be a lot more birds around. Brushtails are in far higher than normal numbers do to suburbia etc, and their high numbers upsets the balance of nature, especially when they go round eating bird eggs.
I do however promote the harvest of possums, especially brushtails. I think it is actually illegal in most states. By harvesting possums, we would get a sustainable soruce of meat right at our front doorsteps, we would be able to grow a lot more food in our own backyards, and there would be a lot more birds around. Brushtails are in far higher than normal numbers do to suburbia etc, and their high numbers upsets the balance of nature, especially when they go round eating bird eggs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests