Turnbull
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- JW.Frogen
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:14 am
Re: Turnbull
Politics 101, you never split your party on an issue that opposition wants and needs.
Turnbull could have just as easily said “I care about climate change but we need to wait until Copenhagen to see what the big boys commit to as none of them are going with pre-passed legislative commitments.”
This is not only true and prudent (who goes to a negotiation with their position already locked in legislation?) but it would have kept his party from splitting on the issue.
Turnbull could have just as easily said “I care about climate change but we need to wait until Copenhagen to see what the big boys commit to as none of them are going with pre-passed legislative commitments.”
This is not only true and prudent (who goes to a negotiation with their position already locked in legislation?) but it would have kept his party from splitting on the issue.
DEEEEEEEEPTHOUGHT IS EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!!
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm
Re: Turnbull
I think its a smart move politically. Clearly established that he is trying to take the Liberal party in a new direction- closer to the middle that Howard was steering away from in the end.
Re: Turnbull
Whenever I think of Turnbull I always picture the fellow depicted in 'Packer's Lunch', and not a major political heavyweight.
- JW.Frogen
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:14 am
Re: Turnbull
Anytime you have split your party you have made a bad move, you can not effect any meaningful change if you can not take power.Rainbow Moonlight wrote:I think its a smart move politically. Clearly established that he is trying to take the Liberal party in a new direction- closer to the middle that Howard was steering away from in the end.
I also think it foolish of Labor to lock us into a postion that may cost us billions while the real cause of the problem the US, China, India hold their cards to their chest before they even go to Copenhagen. Labor is because they wanted to split the Liberals, want to deliever a huge domestic political win, outflank the Greens, but when the cost comes in, it may backfire on them, people will not be poor to be good.
Last edited by JW.Frogen on Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DEEEEEEEEPTHOUGHT IS EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!!
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm
Re: Turnbull
Who gives us the info on numbers caught trying to illegally enter Australia?
- JW.Frogen
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:14 am
Re: Turnbull
That would have to be the Department of Immigration, but if there was a huge tide actually getting in and hiding given the controversial nature of Howard's "Pacific Solution" Labor would have jumped all over him, they did not because there is not, not even under Labor with the Labor changes.Rainbow Moonlight wrote:Who gives us the info on numbers caught trying to illegally enter Australia?
DEEEEEEEEPTHOUGHT IS EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!!
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: Turnbull
Even the party whip has resigned... meltdown time 

"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
Re: Turnbull
Ya know, I cannot believe how bloody stupid this all is. When it comes to Federal, I am Labor, always have been. Same with State, except in the last two elections. So..............there is my hand on the matter.boxy wrote:Even the party whip has resigned... meltdown time
These current Federal Libs are totally fucked, but stupid me reckoned their best chance was with Turnbull. Somewhere in PA archives, you will find me saying that ever since Hayseed got the bullet.
Who? Abbot? Fuck off.
Hockey...............hmmmm................nay, fuck off.
Who is the Messiah?
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm
Re: Turnbull
I think these resignations could be mistaken demonstrations of loyalty to the old policies and position of Howard - that or having been let off a very tight leash when he left.
I suppose though that Howard had much genuine support in his own party so these resignations could just be genuine heartfelt opinion based.Andto be fair, not necessarily anti-environmental, although very likely to be seen so.
I don't see why he won't retain the leadership. If these people had had the numbers on their side they would have challenged earlier. They are trying to pressure him to resign and other party members to think he should resign "for the good of the party", which of course is to dvance their own positions.
I think he should immediately replace them in shadow cabinet and not let them back for quite some time.
I suppose though that Howard had much genuine support in his own party so these resignations could just be genuine heartfelt opinion based.Andto be fair, not necessarily anti-environmental, although very likely to be seen so.
I don't see why he won't retain the leadership. If these people had had the numbers on their side they would have challenged earlier. They are trying to pressure him to resign and other party members to think he should resign "for the good of the party", which of course is to dvance their own positions.
I think he should immediately replace them in shadow cabinet and not let them back for quite some time.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests