Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
-
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 2:57 pm
- BigP
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:56 pm
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
The general rule of thumb Mal , is any charge that is put before a Judge, Jury or both must be proven before a conviction is lodged,,
-
- Posts: 10234
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
Collective evidence can be taken into consideration also, ie, prior convictions, criminal history etc.
Forensic evidence also, ie, some defendant's may have had their computers forensically examined at some point due to an unrelated matter and evidence taken from this examination can lead to an arrest.
Proof is a broad church.
Forensic evidence also, ie, some defendant's may have had their computers forensically examined at some point due to an unrelated matter and evidence taken from this examination can lead to an arrest.
Proof is a broad church.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
- BigP
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:56 pm
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
In NZ prior convictions can only be considered during sentencing. every case is considered on its meritsmellie wrote:Collective evidence can be taken into consideration also, ie, prior convictions, criminal history etc.
Forensic evidence also, ie, some defendant's may have had their computers forensically examined at some point due to an unrelated matter and evidence taken from this examination can lead to an arrest.
Proof is a broad church.
- The Mechanic
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:23 pm
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
Its just "hearsay" these days...
Any woman can accuse a man of doing whatever these days and then thats it..
HE'S GUILTY...
Take Doyle for instance... a few woman that decided that they hated him destroyed him..
he touched me therefore he sexually assaulted me... ffs..
Any woman can accuse a man of doing whatever these days and then thats it..
HE'S GUILTY...
Take Doyle for instance... a few woman that decided that they hated him destroyed him..
he touched me therefore he sexually assaulted me... ffs..
Beware the Fury of a Patient Man Q WWG1WGA ▄︻╦デ╤一
-
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 2:57 pm
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
sO MECH MAN HAS NO LEG TO STAND ON?BigP wrote:The general rule of thumb Mal , is any charge that is put before a Judge, Jury or both must be proven before a conviction is lodged,,
Stop making things worse!
-
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:57 pm
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
No.Malcolm_hates_your_kids wrote:sO MECH MAN HAS NO LEG TO STAND ON?BigP wrote:The general rule of thumb Mal , is any charge that is put before a Judge, Jury or both must be proven before a conviction is lodged,,
-
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 2:57 pm
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
So why doesn't BO have a go then? bIASED MUCH????Mistress Nicole wrote:No.Malcolm_hates_your_kids wrote:sO MECH MAN HAS NO LEG TO STAND ON?BigP wrote:The general rule of thumb Mal , is any charge that is put before a Judge, Jury or both must be proven before a conviction is lodged,,
Stop making things worse!
-
- Posts: 6433
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:52 am
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
The Mechanic wrote:Its just "hearsay" these days...
Any woman can accuse a man of doing whatever these days and then thats it..
HE'S GUILTY...
Take Doyle for instance... a few woman that decided that they hated him destroyed him..
he touched me therefore he sexually assaulted me... ffs..
so no such thing as rapoe then??>....what does without consent mean then do your think?
-
- Posts: 10234
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Re: Doesn't 'rape' have to be proven in a court of law?
Exactly Cods.
About time someone stood up.
Apparently no means yes, to some.
About time someone stood up.
Apparently no means yes, to some.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests