the senate

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
User avatar
Mattus
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:04 pm
Location: Internationalist

Re: the senate

Post by Mattus » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:07 am

Hebe wrote: Get the bloody gas-guzzlers off the roads.
Oh come off it. Stop trying to disguise a new tax as an environmental solution.

I have fucking had it with Rudd's labor. So far their answer to everything has been to tax it.

Binge drinking? Tax it.
Carbon emissions? Tax it.
Inefficient cars? Tax it.

It doesn't work. It's doesn't work! Anyone can tell Rudd it doesn't work. Taxing alcopops just resulted in more kids drinking fucking Jager-bombs and champagne. Taxing luxury cars will result in nothing more than public servants and doctors in Tasmania demanding a cost of living pay rise. We need more imaginative solutions to problems than simply slapping on another tax. Labor is behaving as nothing more that their stereotype under Rudd. It's embarrassing. Smarten the fuck up Rudd or you'll be out on your ear as soon as the opposition can find a leader.

The senate did the right thing. Keep the bastards honest.. and if the silly bobbleheaded fluffy bunny wants to dissolve government over a proposed tax increase he'll be in for a ball shock at the ballot box. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against increasing tax, but justifying it as some sort of environmental mandate or a solution to a social problem like binge drinking is just absurd.
"I may be the first man to put a testicle in Germaine Greer's mouth"

-Heston Blumenthal

User avatar
JW Frogen
Posts: 2034
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:41 am

Re: the senate

Post by JW Frogen » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:44 am

I am currently enduring one of the worst flues of my life but it must be far worse than I thought because I am totally agreeing with a post by Mattus.

Oliver Nickezoff

Re: the senate

Post by Oliver Nickezoff » Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:23 am

Mattus wrote:
Hebe wrote: Get the bloody gas-guzzlers off the roads.
Oh come off it. Stop trying to disguise a new tax as an environmental solution.

I have fucking had it with Rudd's labor. So far their answer to everything has been to tax it.

Binge drinking? Tax it.
Carbon emissions? Tax it.
Inefficient cars? Tax it.

It doesn't work. It's doesn't work! Anyone can tell Rudd it doesn't work. Taxing alcopops just resulted in more kids drinking fucking Jager-bombs and champagne. Taxing luxury cars will result in nothing more than public servants and doctors in Tasmania demanding a cost of living pay rise. We need more imaginative solutions to problems than simply slapping on another tax. Labor is behaving as nothing more that their stereotype under Rudd. It's embarrassing. Smarten the fuck up Rudd or you'll be out on your ear as soon as the opposition can find a leader.

The senate did the right thing. Keep the bastards honest.. and if the silly bobbleheaded fluffy bunny wants to dissolve government over a proposed tax increase he'll be in for a ball shock at the ballot box. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against increasing tax, but justifying it as some sort of environmental mandate or a solution to a social problem like binge drinking is just absurd.
Why no outrage about the fact that there is already a luxury car tax of 25%. Shouldn't that be removed?
Why no outrage about the fact that wine had a new tax added to it to counter the effect of GST. The same effect that the GST had on reducing the price of premix drinks. Shouldn't that wine tax be removed?

I heard some figures the other day showing that tax as a percentage of GDP is lower this year than last year or any of the last 5 years, this at a time of "global economic tsunami" when we might need all the money in the bank we can get.

slimD

Re: the senate

Post by slimD » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:30 pm

Rainbow Moonlight wrote:I think the luxury car tax is a good idea. Simple transport needs do not have to be met by a 57000 + vehicle.
Simple transport needs can be met by a good pair of shoes, a bicycle, or public transport. All cars are a luxury. And if removing the tax is going to blow a hole in the budget, well, they've fucked up big time, as the tax wasn't there in the first place, and it seems they've already banked on it.
Alco-pops? The dumb fucks can tax it all they like. They are lucky the teen generation is lazy, otherwise the young ones would be brewing their own, legally and completely tax free.

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: the senate

Post by freediver » Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:09 pm

Yeah.....how do you do that....at the bowser?

How do you tax petrol? There is already a tax on it. You just increase it. It doesn't make any difference 'where' you put the tax on.

It doesn't work. It's doesn't work! Anyone can tell Rudd it doesn't work. Taxing alcopops just resulted in more kids drinking fucking Jager-bombs and champagne.

Carbon taxes do work. Drug taxes work to raise revenue, but not to reduce consumption - because they are drugs and consumptions is relatively inelastic.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 42 guests