Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:42 pm

J o h n S m i t h wrote:
Outlaw Yogi wrote: No, you are. Hypocrite.
for not pretending one of Menzies most famous quotes was a lie? :lol: :lol: :lol:
You must have a strange definition of a 'hypocrite'
No, I use it in the conventional manner. To describe someone who accuses others of their own faults/failings.
Which you do constantly, giving me the impression you're a schizo.

Outlaw Yogi wrote:And probably vegetarian as well.
J o h n S m i t h wrote: is this to highlight just how stupid you are? If so good job, but not necessary. it was already fairly obvious.
No, it's expressing a suspicion on the cause of your extremist perceptions and unrealistic dogmas.
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Communists founded the Labor (when they could spell Labour) Party, Dropkick!
J o h n S m i t h wrote:trade unions founded the labor party you idiot.
Who were communists like my trade unionist grandfather, you ignorant cretin!
Outlaw Yogi wrote:"Anarchy" is apolitical you moron.
J o h n S m i t h wrote: I'm sure you think that sounds nice, but I'd prefer to deal with reality
Having zero govt. control is just as much a political view as having total govt. control. Call it apolitical all you like, it won't help you.
Not according to conventional wisdom. Quite evidently you don't comprehend the terms you use in your rants.
See boys and girls, John boy here is a living example of what happens when you let lefties dumb down your population by destruction of education standards - fucking idiots who don't have a clue what they're banging on about.

anarchy
/'an?ki/

noun: anarchy

1. a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems.

synonyms: lawlessness, absence of government, nihilism, mobocracy, revolution, insurrection, riot, rebellion, mutiny, disorder, disorganization, misrule, chaos, tumult, turmoil, mayhem, pandemonium


2. absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.
https://www.google.com.au/?gws_rd=ssl#q ... finition&*

anarchist

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/anarchist
noun
1.
a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.

2.
a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.

3.
a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

J o h n S m i t h
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by J o h n S m i t h » Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:54 pm

Outlaw Yogi wrote: anarchy

/'an?ki/

noun: anarchy

1. a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems.

synonyms: lawlessness, absence of government, nihilism, mobocracy, revolution, insurrection, riot, rebellion, mutiny, disorder, disorganization, misrule, chaos, tumult, turmoil, mayhem, pandemonium


2. absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.


https://www.google.com.au/?gws_rd=ssl#q ... definition&*

anarchist

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/anarchist

noun
1.
a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.

2.
a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.

3.
a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom.

now highlight where it says anything about it being an absence of a political view? :tease :tease :tease


now this ladies and gents is why you should be careful to fully cook your wild pig before you eat it ... the worms have now made their way into Yogi's brains, and left him short of a full pack

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Wed Mar 01, 2017 2:24 pm

J o h n S m i t h wrote:
Outlaw Yogi wrote: anarchy

/'an?ki/

noun: anarchy

1. a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems.

synonyms: lawlessness, absence of government, nihilism, mobocracy, revolution, insurrection, riot, rebellion, mutiny, disorder, disorganization, misrule, chaos, tumult, turmoil, mayhem, pandemonium


2. absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.


https://www.google.com.au/?gws_rd=ssl#q ... definition&*

anarchist

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/anarchist

noun
1.
a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.

2.
a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.

3.
a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom.

now highlight where it says anything about it being an absence of a political view? :tease :tease :tease
"Anarchy"
1. a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems.
"Anarchist"
2. a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.
The definition itself illustrates a lack of political anything. But then the point isn't about a political view as your side stepping distraction infers, it's about your using terms you don't know the true meaning of.

J o h n S m i t h wrote: now this ladies and gents is why you should be careful to fully cook your wild pig before you eat it ... the worms have now made their way into Yogi's brains, and left him short of a full pack
I like my meat and worms (+ worm eggs) well done thanks.
BTW the worms in question, a fluke work don't invade the brain, they dwell in and affect the muscles, thus why they are commonly referred to as "muscle worms". Cooking kills them and the eggs.
But then it's hardly surprising someone with a zinc deficiency (causing stupidity) from a vegetarian diet would be ignorant of that.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

J o h n S m i t h
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by J o h n S m i t h » Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:12 pm

Outlaw Yogi wrote:But then the point isn't about a political view as your side stepping distraction infers, it's about your using terms you don't know the true meaning of.
yes, I'd run away too if I were you! :rofl :rofl :rofl


here. all you had to do was google. I'm sure even you would have gotten the spelling right after 2 or 3 goes.

Anarchism is a political philosophy that advocates self-governed societies based on voluntary institutions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
Outlaw Yogi wrote: I like my meat and worms (+ worm eggs) well done thanks.
to match your brain ... cooked!

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Neferti » Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:26 pm

Malcolm Turnbull is NOT a Liberal. He LOST MANY seats last election because of it. I voted INFORMAL but a lot of people who were "rusted on" Liberals either voted INFORMAL or voted for some Independent.

Hope he dies soon.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by IQS.RLOW » Wed Mar 01, 2017 6:39 pm

Neferti~ wrote:Malcolm Turnbull is NOT a Liberal. He LOST MANY seats last election because of it. I voted INFORMAL but a lot of people who were "rusted on" Liberals either voted INFORMAL or voted for some Independent.

Hope he dies soon.
No one likes a lefty.
Even if they pretend to be a righty, you can always tell by the smell of shit and feel their hands in your pockets.
Proof= the Leftys here.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Lucas
Posts: 939
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 11:11 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Lucas » Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:39 am

There is no Liberal Party since Turnbull stuck his hand in Shortens Knife drawer. Its he TurnBULL party, a side show at best. Unlike the Big Top shorten runs the TurnBULL party has a smaller tent and half the clowns.

Maybe TurdBULL could have another Muslim Dinner and invite Short ass and let his true colors show and stab each other. After all they both bleed green.

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat Mar 04, 2017 2:46 pm

J o h n S m i t h wrote:
Outlaw Yogi wrote:But then the point isn't about a political view as your side stepping distraction infers, it's about your using terms you don't know the true meaning of.
yes, I'd run away too if I were you! :rofl :rofl :rofl
Run from what cretin?
Why would I run? I intellectually smash every reply you make.

J o h n S m i t h wrote: here. all you had to do was google. I'm sure even you would have gotten the spelling right after 2 or 3 goes.

Anarchism is a political philosophy that advocates self-governed societies based on voluntary institutions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
Only problem with that left wing moonbat appraisal is cotradicts the deffinition of anarchy/arnarchist.
Anarchy/anarchists don't advocate anything, believe in governance nor institutions.
Real anarchy would be like Mad Max 2. I think I'd quite enjoy it, 'coz I could slit your throat and sell your family into slavery.

As for spelling mistakes? I didn't make any, so if you're seeing one, that would be one of your psychotic (schizophukwitic) hallucinations.
Outlaw Yogi wrote: I like my meat and worms (+ worm eggs) well done thanks.
J o h n S m i t h wrote: to match your brain ... cooked!
[/quote]
Well I articulate my diatribes far better than you do yours, suggesting my cooked brain functions in a superior manner to the mashed chic peas in your skull.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

J o h n S m i t h
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by J o h n S m i t h » Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:36 pm

Outlaw Yogi wrote:
Run from what cretin?
seems like you are running from your own argument
Outlaw Yogi wrote: I intellectually smash every reply you make.
you don't get to judge your own work you idiot. That's for others to decide. :roll :roll :roll
Outlaw Yogi wrote: Only problem with that left wing moonbat appraisal is cotradicts the deffinition of anarchy/arnarchist.
no, the problem is that if anyone shows you something that contradicts your own claims, you immediately write it off as being ' left wing moonbat' or some other such crap. Whilst you keep that attitude, you are beyond help.
Outlaw Yogi wrote:I think I'd quite enjoy it, 'coz I could slit your throat and sell your family into slavery.
you could certainly try, but seeing as how you let someone kill your dogs, and apart from cry about it on a forum, do nothing except fold your tail between your legs and run , I don't think I've got to much to worry about.
Outlaw Yogi wrote: As for spelling mistakes? I didn't make any
I didn't say you did ... but you did prove my point about that cooked brain. :rofl :rofl
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Well I articulate my diatribes far better than you do yours, suggesting my cooked brain functions in a superior manner to the mashed chic peas in your skull
your good at talking shit, true ... I'd rather keep things simple so as to not confuse you.Pity it didn't help you, you still got confused. :roll :roll

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests