Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by IQS.RLOW » Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:06 am

You have no idea what reality is. You've been living in lefty fucking fantasy world where your daily release of talking points from the ALP is still insisting that solar, wind and 50% renewables will keep electricity costs down...And you support a party that blatantly repeats their lies daily.

You will be one of the first up against the wall for your blind support of the traitors of this nation, the fucking ALP.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

J o h n S m i t h
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by J o h n S m i t h » Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:40 am

IQS.RLOW wrote:You have no idea what reality is. You've been living in lefty fucking fantasy world where your daily release of talking points from the ALP is still insisting that solar, wind and 50% renewables will keep electricity costs down...And you support a party that blatantly repeats their lies daily.

You will be one of the first up against the wall for your blind support of the traitors of this nation, the fucking ALP.

and you have the hide to claim that all others do is write vacuous posts ... :giggle :giggle

not one original idea, supported argument or attempt at real debate from you at all, you're unable or unwilling to provide any proof to your arguments, just the usual ranting and raving of a retarded lunatic .

You're a clueless fool who just repeats empty anti labor slogans and thinks that's a substitute for debate. Next time don't waste my time pretending you're interested in debate you fool.

User avatar
Redneck
Posts: 6276
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Redneck » Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:38 am

Good debate largely!

Well done lads!

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:59 pm

Outlaw Yogi wrote:Do you actually believe Menzies, the man who created a misnomer by giving a conservative party a left wing name honestly believed a word of that?
J o h n S m i t h wrote:so anything you don't agree with you're going to say is a lie, even direct quotes?
Well if you understood the game of politics you'd know that politicians typically bullshit for living, and as most are ex lawyers tend to be quite practiced at it.
For example, just think about all the broken promises they reneg/welsh on. Politics is about gaining favour and so most playing the game will say virtually anything whether they agree with or believe it or not.

You claim Menzies was Left wing on social policies. Are you ignorant of the fact Menzies instituted conscription to fight communists in SE Asia (Vietnam)?
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Yep, Menzies was so left wing he ran a referendum on outlawing Communism in Australia.
J o h n S m i t h wrote:you're getting confused.
No, you're babbling shit.

J o h n S m i t h wrote: No one said he was left wing,
Really? .. then what's this?
J o h n S m i t h wrote: On social policies Menzies was very left wing.

J o h n S m i t h wrote:only that he was more left than the current mob.
Oh right, so Turnbull the supporter of the 'Republic' referendum plus restricter and pilferer of superannuation funds is more Right wing than Menzies the anti-communist royalist? .... You must be schizopherenic ... I bet you're a vegetarian.
J o h n S m i t h wrote:Comparing the left to communists is like pretending the right are anarchists.
Communism is Left wing, as is communism-lite (socialism), thus why communist regimes have often referred to themselves as
Socialist Republics ... eg USSR = United Soviet Socialist Republics ... get the idea?
And true anarchists (like Rupert Murdoch for example, not the feral city squatters you see at Left wing protests) are libertarians like myself, and libertarians are considered Right wing. But only because lefty moonbats oppose free will, free speech and free enterprise. In reality true anarchists are as you inferred - apolitical.


Outlaw Yogi wrote: Turnbull's Labor -lite policies? Yes indeed!
J o h n S m i t h wrote:turnbulls policies? how have they changed from Abbotts policies? :roll: :roll: :roll:
Superannuation taxes and caps for a start.

Outlaw Yogi wrote:No, they prove me correct.
J o h n S m i t h wrote:not even close
No, spot on actually, for someone not speaking Orwellian double speak like yourself.
Outlaw Yogi wrote: That's right, because he implemented policies the electorate could have got from Labor.
J o h n S m i t h wrote: what policies did Turnbull implement?
Increased superannuation taxes and caps.
Last edited by Outlaw Yogi on Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:09 pm, edited 4 times in total.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:05 pm

There's something wrong with the quotation function admin. I've reedited over and over at least 5 times and the same invisible quote mark keeps mucking up the post.

Or it could be the hacker > rego 036-JMC
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by IQS.RLOW » Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:59 pm

J o h n S m i t h wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:You have no idea what reality is. You've been living in lefty fucking fantasy world where your daily release of talking points from the ALP is still insisting that solar, wind and 50% renewables will keep electricity costs down...And you support a party that blatantly repeats their lies daily.

You will be one of the first up against the wall for your blind support of the traitors of this nation, the fucking ALP.

and you have the hide to claim that all others do is write vacuous posts ... :giggle :giggle

not one original idea, supported argument or attempt at real debate from you at all, you're unable or unwilling to provide any proof to your arguments, just the usual ranting and raving of a retarded lunatic .

You're a clueless fool who just repeats empty anti labor slogans and thinks that's a substitute for debate. Next time don't waste my time pretending you're interested in debate you fool.
When you find anyone who gives a flying fuck what you, an insignificant troll who has 50K+ posts over a short time and not one with any relevant content, let me know.
Until then youre a shitposter with no life who spends an huge amount of time trying to perfect your online heckling ability, and failing.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

J o h n S m i t h
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by J o h n S m i t h » Mon Feb 20, 2017 3:58 pm

Outlaw Yogi wrote: Well if you understood the game of politics you'd know that politicians typically bullshit for living, and as most are ex lawyers tend to be quite practiced at it.
So you're ignoring everything pretending they must have lied because it doesn't suit your narrative? We aren't talking about a broken promise, we're talking ideology. Menzies always supported helping the unemployed
Outlaw Yogi wrote: You claim Menzies was Left wing on social policies. Are you ignorant of the fact Menzies instituted conscription to fight communists in SE Asia (Vietnam)?
I claimed he was more left wing than the current mob. And conscription to fight communists doesn't prove sh1t. My wife came fro a socialist country and they had conscription, does that make Ceausescu a rightie?
Communism is the extreme left just like anarchy is the extreme right. We in Australia have always been near the center, either center left or center right. No one ever seriously supported socialism or communism, just as no one ever supported anarchy. To argue they were opposed to communism is a mute point because everyone was opposed to communism, even labor.
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Really? .. then what's this?
taken out of context ... I was talking about when compared to the current mob. I probably could have phrased it better.
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Oh right, so Turnbull the supporter of the 'Republic' referendum plus restricter and pilferer of superannuation funds is more Right wing than Menzies the anti-communist royalist? .... You must be schizopherenic ... I bet you're a vegetarian


you're confusing issues. Every politician was a monarchist back in the early 40's. I doubt you'd find any politician, from either the left or right who was calling for a republic. And no, I can't stand vegetarians so I've no idea where you go that crap ... probably from the same place you got the idea that turdball is a leftie
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Communism is Left wing, as is communism-lite (socialism), thus why communist regimes have often referred to themselves as
Socialist Republics ... eg USSR = United Soviet Socialist Republics ... get the idea?
And true anarchists (like Rupert Murdoch for example, not the feral city squatters you see at Left wing protests) are libertarians like myself, and libertarians are considered Right wing. But only because lefty moonbats oppose free will, free speech and free enterprise. In reality true anarchists are as you inferred - apolitical.
most people don't sit on the extreme ends, rather they sit somewhere in the middle. To refer to a ALP supporter as a communist shows you've no idea how the political spectrum works. I don't agree with your comment that anarchists are apolitical. That's bullsh1t. ANarchists believe in self governing. That in itself is a political position.

IQS.RLOW wrote: Superannuation taxes and caps for a start.
a $1.6m cap on contributions and a $100 000 cap on income before any of it incurs any tax? show me one real leftie who would ever argue that is fair. A pensioner works for two days a week and loses half his pension as gratitude, yet a self funded retiree person can make $100k a year, more than the average wage in this country, and not incur tax? ... get real. This is the pretend taxes only a rightard would come up with.

J o h n S m i t h
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by J o h n S m i t h » Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:05 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote: When you find anyone who gives a flying fuck what you, an insignificant troll who has 50K+ posts over a short time and not one with any relevant content, let me know.
Just as I thought, you haven't a clue so you resort to your usual position of juvenile abuse ... but since you asked nicely, here's one who seems to give a fuck what I say

IQS.RLOW wrote: Vacuous posts, nut swinging and gobbling seems to be all you're capable of.


you prove just how cretinous you are each and every day. You shouldn't make it so easy for me.
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by Neferti » Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:33 pm

Turncoat is NOT a conservative .... he lost 14 seats (or whatever it was) because we either voted INFORMAL or gave our vote to some Independent.

Remember that he used $1.75m of his OWN MONEY to get to be PM.

Malcolm is a fuckwit. I probably will NEVER vote Liberal again because of him.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!

Post by IQS.RLOW » Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:14 pm

J o h n S m i t h wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote: When you find anyone who gives a flying fuck what you, an insignificant troll who has 50K+ posts over a short time and not one with any relevant content, let me know.
Just as I thought, you haven't a clue so you resort to your usual position of juvenile abuse ... but since you asked nicely, here's one who seems to give a fuck what I say

IQS.RLOW wrote: Vacuous posts, nut swinging and gobbling seems to be all you're capable of.
You mistake my signposting of your piles of shit so other people don't step in them as giving a fuck what you say.
Your opinion of your abilities is equal to your opinion of your intelligence. Neither of which are based in reality.
You should spend less time posting from your mother's basement and more time in the real world.
You will need to learn how to wipe your own chin and arse when mummy isn't there to tell you how clever you are.

you prove just how cretinous you are each and every day. You shouldn't make it so easy for me.
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Cretinous is what your children would be diagnosed with...If you ever get a woman other than your mummy to touch your peepee.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests