Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
You have no idea what reality is. You've been living in lefty fucking fantasy world where your daily release of talking points from the ALP is still insisting that solar, wind and 50% renewables will keep electricity costs down...And you support a party that blatantly repeats their lies daily.
You will be one of the first up against the wall for your blind support of the traitors of this nation, the fucking ALP.
You will be one of the first up against the wall for your blind support of the traitors of this nation, the fucking ALP.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
IQS.RLOW wrote:You have no idea what reality is. You've been living in lefty fucking fantasy world where your daily release of talking points from the ALP is still insisting that solar, wind and 50% renewables will keep electricity costs down...And you support a party that blatantly repeats their lies daily.
You will be one of the first up against the wall for your blind support of the traitors of this nation, the fucking ALP.
and you have the hide to claim that all others do is write vacuous posts ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f49a/3f49a3b7e5f6a7fbc307192315acb5719cbd691a" alt="giggle :giggle"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f49a/3f49a3b7e5f6a7fbc307192315acb5719cbd691a" alt="giggle :giggle"
not one original idea, supported argument or attempt at real debate from you at all, you're unable or unwilling to provide any proof to your arguments, just the usual ranting and raving of a retarded lunatic .
You're a clueless fool who just repeats empty anti labor slogans and thinks that's a substitute for debate. Next time don't waste my time pretending you're interested in debate you fool.
- Redneck
- Posts: 6276
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:28 pm
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
Good debate largely!
Well done lads!
Well done lads!
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Do you actually believe Menzies, the man who created a misnomer by giving a conservative party a left wing name honestly believed a word of that?
Well if you understood the game of politics you'd know that politicians typically bullshit for living, and as most are ex lawyers tend to be quite practiced at it.J o h n S m i t h wrote:so anything you don't agree with you're going to say is a lie, even direct quotes?
For example, just think about all the broken promises they reneg/welsh on. Politics is about gaining favour and so most playing the game will say virtually anything whether they agree with or believe it or not.
You claim Menzies was Left wing on social policies. Are you ignorant of the fact Menzies instituted conscription to fight communists in SE Asia (Vietnam)?
Increased superannuation taxes and caps.Outlaw Yogi wrote:Yep, Menzies was so left wing he ran a referendum on outlawing Communism in Australia.
No, you're babbling shit.J o h n S m i t h wrote:you're getting confused.
Really? .. then what's this?J o h n S m i t h wrote: No one said he was left wing,
J o h n S m i t h wrote: On social policies Menzies was very left wing.
Oh right, so Turnbull the supporter of the 'Republic' referendum plus restricter and pilferer of superannuation funds is more Right wing than Menzies the anti-communist royalist? .... You must be schizopherenic ... I bet you're a vegetarian.J o h n S m i t h wrote:only that he was more left than the current mob.
Communism is Left wing, as is communism-lite (socialism), thus why communist regimes have often referred to themselves asJ o h n S m i t h wrote:Comparing the left to communists is like pretending the right are anarchists.
Socialist Republics ... eg USSR = United Soviet Socialist Republics ... get the idea?
And true anarchists (like Rupert Murdoch for example, not the feral city squatters you see at Left wing protests) are libertarians like myself, and libertarians are considered Right wing. But only because lefty moonbats oppose free will, free speech and free enterprise. In reality true anarchists are as you inferred - apolitical.
Outlaw Yogi wrote: Turnbull's Labor -lite policies? Yes indeed!Superannuation taxes and caps for a start.J o h n S m i t h wrote:turnbulls policies? how have they changed from Abbotts policies?![]()
![]()
![]()
Outlaw Yogi wrote:No, they prove me correct.No, spot on actually, for someone not speaking Orwellian double speak like yourself.J o h n S m i t h wrote:not even close
Outlaw Yogi wrote: That's right, because he implemented policies the electorate could have got from Labor.J o h n S m i t h wrote: what policies did Turnbull implement?
Last edited by Outlaw Yogi on Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:09 pm, edited 4 times in total.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
- Outlaw Yogi
- Posts: 2404
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
There's something wrong with the quotation function admin. I've reedited over and over at least 5 times and the same invisible quote mark keeps mucking up the post.
Or it could be the hacker > rego 036-JMC
Or it could be the hacker > rego 036-JMC
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?
- IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
When you find anyone who gives a flying fuck what you, an insignificant troll who has 50K+ posts over a short time and not one with any relevant content, let me know.J o h n S m i t h wrote:IQS.RLOW wrote:You have no idea what reality is. You've been living in lefty fucking fantasy world where your daily release of talking points from the ALP is still insisting that solar, wind and 50% renewables will keep electricity costs down...And you support a party that blatantly repeats their lies daily.
You will be one of the first up against the wall for your blind support of the traitors of this nation, the fucking ALP.
and you have the hide to claim that all others do is write vacuous posts ...![]()
![]()
not one original idea, supported argument or attempt at real debate from you at all, you're unable or unwilling to provide any proof to your arguments, just the usual ranting and raving of a retarded lunatic .
You're a clueless fool who just repeats empty anti labor slogans and thinks that's a substitute for debate. Next time don't waste my time pretending you're interested in debate you fool.
Until then youre a shitposter with no life who spends an huge amount of time trying to perfect your online heckling ability, and failing.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
So you're ignoring everything pretending they must have lied because it doesn't suit your narrative? We aren't talking about a broken promise, we're talking ideology. Menzies always supported helping the unemployedOutlaw Yogi wrote: Well if you understood the game of politics you'd know that politicians typically bullshit for living, and as most are ex lawyers tend to be quite practiced at it.
I claimed he was more left wing than the current mob. And conscription to fight communists doesn't prove sh1t. My wife came fro a socialist country and they had conscription, does that make Ceausescu a rightie?Outlaw Yogi wrote: You claim Menzies was Left wing on social policies. Are you ignorant of the fact Menzies instituted conscription to fight communists in SE Asia (Vietnam)?
Communism is the extreme left just like anarchy is the extreme right. We in Australia have always been near the center, either center left or center right. No one ever seriously supported socialism or communism, just as no one ever supported anarchy. To argue they were opposed to communism is a mute point because everyone was opposed to communism, even labor.
taken out of context ... I was talking about when compared to the current mob. I probably could have phrased it better.Outlaw Yogi wrote:Really? .. then what's this?
Outlaw Yogi wrote:Oh right, so Turnbull the supporter of the 'Republic' referendum plus restricter and pilferer of superannuation funds is more Right wing than Menzies the anti-communist royalist? .... You must be schizopherenic ... I bet you're a vegetarian
you're confusing issues. Every politician was a monarchist back in the early 40's. I doubt you'd find any politician, from either the left or right who was calling for a republic. And no, I can't stand vegetarians so I've no idea where you go that crap ... probably from the same place you got the idea that turdball is a leftie
most people don't sit on the extreme ends, rather they sit somewhere in the middle. To refer to a ALP supporter as a communist shows you've no idea how the political spectrum works. I don't agree with your comment that anarchists are apolitical. That's bullsh1t. ANarchists believe in self governing. That in itself is a political position.Outlaw Yogi wrote:Communism is Left wing, as is communism-lite (socialism), thus why communist regimes have often referred to themselves as
Socialist Republics ... eg USSR = United Soviet Socialist Republics ... get the idea?
And true anarchists (like Rupert Murdoch for example, not the feral city squatters you see at Left wing protests) are libertarians like myself, and libertarians are considered Right wing. But only because lefty moonbats oppose free will, free speech and free enterprise. In reality true anarchists are as you inferred - apolitical.
a $1.6m cap on contributions and a $100 000 cap on income before any of it incurs any tax? show me one real leftie who would ever argue that is fair. A pensioner works for two days a week and loses half his pension as gratitude, yet a self funded retiree person can make $100k a year, more than the average wage in this country, and not incur tax? ... get real. This is the pretend taxes only a rightard would come up with.IQS.RLOW wrote: Superannuation taxes and caps for a start.
-
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
Just as I thought, you haven't a clue so you resort to your usual position of juvenile abuse ... but since you asked nicely, here's one who seems to give a fuck what I sayIQS.RLOW wrote: When you find anyone who gives a flying fuck what you, an insignificant troll who has 50K+ posts over a short time and not one with any relevant content, let me know.
IQS.RLOW wrote: Vacuous posts, nut swinging and gobbling seems to be all you're capable of.
you prove just how cretinous you are each and every day. You shouldn't make it so easy for me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6d5a/a6d5adc05b3425654dbcf0aa8514d2331c62f4fc" alt="ROFLMAO :rofl"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6d5a/a6d5adc05b3425654dbcf0aa8514d2331c62f4fc" alt="ROFLMAO :rofl"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6d5a/a6d5adc05b3425654dbcf0aa8514d2331c62f4fc" alt="ROFLMAO :rofl"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6d5a/a6d5adc05b3425654dbcf0aa8514d2331c62f4fc" alt="ROFLMAO :rofl"
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
Turncoat is NOT a conservative .... he lost 14 seats (or whatever it was) because we either voted INFORMAL or gave our vote to some Independent.
Remember that he used $1.75m of his OWN MONEY to get to be PM.
Malcolm is a fuckwit. I probably will NEVER vote Liberal again because of him.
Remember that he used $1.75m of his OWN MONEY to get to be PM.
Malcolm is a fuckwit. I probably will NEVER vote Liberal again because of him.
- IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: Should Malcolm call George's Bluff!
You mistake my signposting of your piles of shit so other people don't step in them as giving a fuck what you say.J o h n S m i t h wrote:Just as I thought, you haven't a clue so you resort to your usual position of juvenile abuse ... but since you asked nicely, here's one who seems to give a fuck what I sayIQS.RLOW wrote: When you find anyone who gives a flying fuck what you, an insignificant troll who has 50K+ posts over a short time and not one with any relevant content, let me know.
IQS.RLOW wrote: Vacuous posts, nut swinging and gobbling seems to be all you're capable of.
Your opinion of your abilities is equal to your opinion of your intelligence. Neither of which are based in reality.
You should spend less time posting from your mother's basement and more time in the real world.
You will need to learn how to wipe your own chin and arse when mummy isn't there to tell you how clever you are.
Cretinous is what your children would be diagnosed with...If you ever get a woman other than your mummy to touch your peepee.you prove just how cretinous you are each and every day. You shouldn't make it so easy for me.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests