US Presidential race

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:09 am

AiA in Atlanta wrote:Jebbie and Hillary are both corporate candidates who can raise the needed money. Elizabeth Warren is the kind of president America needs: a woman and a real progressive who would take on Wall Street and Big Banks.
Take them on to what end?
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:15 am

IQS.RLOW wrote:
AiA in Atlanta wrote:Jebbie and Hillary are both corporate candidates who can raise the needed money. Elizabeth Warren is the kind of president America needs: a woman and a real progressive who would take on Wall Street and Big Banks.
Take them on to what end?
Republican president Theodore Roosevelt took them on with his Square Deal. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt took them on with his New Deal. I could see Warren doing something along those lines.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:17 am

Warren is a far left socialist.

No wonder you like her.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

DrMattus
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:01 am

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by DrMattus » Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:52 am

Comparing warren to Roosevelt and Roosevelt is ridiculous. She has achieved nothing in any of her political roles.

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Sun Dec 21, 2014 2:35 am

DrMattus wrote:Comparing warren to Roosevelt and Roosevelt is ridiculous. She has achieved nothing in any of her political roles.
She has only been a senator for a couple of years.

DrMattus
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:01 am

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by DrMattus » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:16 am

AiA in Atlanta wrote:
DrMattus wrote:Comparing warren to Roosevelt and Roosevelt is ridiculous. She has achieved nothing in any of her political roles.
She has only been a senator for a couple of years.
Supremely qualified to be POTUS then....


In measuring the failure of here political career I include her oversight of TARP and other responsibilities, in which she achieved only a public profile for herself and no actual reform. Don't get me wrong, she's a smart person; perhaps the best professor of bankruptcy there has ever been. But, like so many academics, she's utterly ineffective in management, politics and leadership. Which is probably why she was given TARP in the first place.

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by Neferti » Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:33 am

Elizabeth Warren is getting rather old, 65! Isn't Hillary 67? Is that the usual age for the President? Jeb Bush is 61.


Elizabeth Warren, Democrat

Image

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:19 am

DrMattus wrote:
AiA in Atlanta wrote:
DrMattus wrote:Comparing warren to Roosevelt and Roosevelt is ridiculous. She has achieved nothing in any of her political roles.
She has only been a senator for a couple of years.
Supremely qualified to be POTUS then....


In measuring the failure of here political career I include her oversight of TARP and other responsibilities, in which she achieved only a public profile for herself and no actual reform. Don't get me wrong, she's a smart person; perhaps the best professor of bankruptcy there has ever been. But, like so many academics, she's utterly ineffective in management, politics and leadership. Which is probably why she was given TARP in the first place.
She is the only one saying things her peers run away from.

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:13 am

Wall Street financial reform is being dismantled piece by piece. Who is going to stop it? Jebbie or Hillary? Hardly.

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Bush vs Clinton

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Mon Dec 22, 2014 4:02 am

Jebbie won't have real Tea Party support because he is too liberal for them. And he is an insider ... completely.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests