Plus, as aussie was dishing out ridiculous allegations (all of which had been seen before ad infinitum on this and other forums) fed to him by his sidekick, jones, it was noted by members that they were constantly either typing or reading PMs from/to each other. It was pathetic.skippy wrote:I thought it was FDs that introduced on the Tom toms because Aussie used to give a running commentary on everyone PMing each other.
Open discussion
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25705
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Open discussion
- skippy
- Posts: 5239
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm
Re: Open discussion
How is that only half right? Sounds like it was exactly what I said.
Aussie watching what everyone was doing..tick.
FD changed it so it said on the Tom Toms.. Tick. fair dinkum Aussie you'd argue about a root offered to you by Lara Bingle because you didn't like the way she asked.
Aussie watching what everyone was doing..tick.
FD changed it so it said on the Tom Toms.. Tick. fair dinkum Aussie you'd argue about a root offered to you by Lara Bingle because you didn't like the way she asked.
- skippy
- Posts: 5239
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm
Re: Open discussion
I wonder what ever happened to Lisa? She's the only person I know that likes to PM more than Aussie.Black Orchid wrote:Plus, as aussie was dishing out ridiculous allegations (all of which had been seen before ad infinitum on this and other forums) fed to him by his sidekick, jones, it was noted by members that they were constantly either typing or reading PMs from/to each other. It was pathetic.skippy wrote:I thought it was FDs that introduced on the Tom toms because Aussie used to give a running commentary on everyone PMing each other.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25705
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Open discussion
Probably having more cyber babies and/or miscarriages, saving people from burning houses, trying to pay off the 25 cyber limos for the internet wedding, sucking toes in the NT, grocery shopping with twins who are toddlers one week and Uni students a few weeks later.skippy wrote:I wonder what ever happened to Lisa? She's the only person I know that likes to PM more than Aussie.Black Orchid wrote:Plus, as aussie was dishing out ridiculous allegations (all of which had been seen before ad infinitum on this and other forums) fed to him by his sidekick, jones, it was noted by members that they were constantly either typing or reading PMs from/to each other. It was pathetic.skippy wrote:I thought it was FDs that introduced on the Tom toms because Aussie used to give a running commentary on everyone PMing each other.
Re: Open discussion
It had nothing whatever to do with Lisa. It was so simple to observe, and it is still possible to do exactly the same at OzPol. 'Tom toms' was the expression I used, and FD adopted it when he fiddled with the settings.Black Orchid wrote:Plus, as aussie was dishing out ridiculous allegations (all of which had been seen before ad infinitum on this and other forums) fed to him by his sidekick, jones, it was noted by members that they were constantly either typing or reading PMs from/to each other. It was pathetic.skippy wrote:I thought it was FDs that introduced on the Tom toms because Aussie used to give a running commentary on everyone PMing each other.
It was quite jolly fun. It is the sort of humour I really enjoy, of the very subtle, satirical take the piss kind. Most times it is only me who laughs himself stupid because others simply have no idea. Back in the day, cynik, Swami, many, even Mattus would have been all over it.
I am considering changeing my long term tag, the only genuine one I've ever had for more than a decade, to Chingachgook.
Re: Open discussion
Well, it is stupid. Better would have been to ban you for a couple of weeks for what was a case of stalking or mantra could have signed on invisible.
“On the tom toms” is childish. You want to make your mark as Admin then getting rid of crud like that is one way.
We got more Mods and more forums than we have regular posters. Simplify the structure.
boxy is never here, AiA wants skippy to be figurehead Admin. Think again re your choice of mods.
“On the tom toms” is childish. You want to make your mark as Admin then getting rid of crud like that is one way.
We got more Mods and more forums than we have regular posters. Simplify the structure.
boxy is never here, AiA wants skippy to be figurehead Admin. Think again re your choice of mods.
Last edited by GeorgeH on Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25705
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Open discussion
In your hands it was just another tool that you foolishly thought you could manipulate and then use to make allegations, usually false, about other posters.aussie wrote:It was quite jolly fun. It is the sort of humour I really enjoy
It's called stalking and we know it amuses you. What was it you said in relation to monk's stalking of IQ's workplace? Oh yeah, that's right ...
aussie wrote:I condone it, encourage and endorse it in the case of NOIQ.
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Open discussion
I think it was our very own mantra who whined about being "caught posting PMs" ..........Black Orchid wrote:"On the Tom Toms" is fine with me. Why would anyone want to see who is browsing which forum or, more to the point, who is typing or reading a PM anyway? That in itself was more kindergarten than just taking away the option.
IF you remain "hidden" you are incognito and others on the Forum don't know what you are looking at.
Undoubtedly, the Admin and Mods can see who is looking at what, but the rest of us can't.
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Open discussion
yes it was sooooo clever of you to cause something no-one wanted...Aussie wrote:Rorschach wrote:Oh dear... gee who complained about that yet had no support back when it actually happened? You I'm guessing, and you were ignored. I cannot imagine how that is possible, let alone even conceivable.GeorgeH wrote:Could we get rid of the “On the tom toms” nonsense? Bit kindergartenish, what?
oh right.... that was me. Yay, I was right!
Why did it happen? Wasn't it because some Useless dikhead was posting crap about who was on and conspiring together at the same time against him. That was great and jolly fun. It out bluffed the conspirators. I loved it. It was also very clevah of me.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 51 guests