Should Australia become a republic?

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
mellie
Posts: 10199
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by mellie » Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:14 pm

ted wrote:Fact: Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin
Even Florey acknowleded that Fleming discovered penicillin
to suggest otherwise shows disrespect
Fact... Fleming discovered an antimicrobial mould, the Australian pharmacist Florey brought us the drug penicillin a decade later.

If it had not been for Florey expanding on Flemings mere observation...Fleming would not have received a Nobel Prize.

Florey was a nice bloke... hu!

8-)

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by Rorschach » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:44 pm

ted wrote:Fact: Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin
Even Florey acknowleded that Fleming discovered penicillin
to suggest otherwise shows disrespect
Never said he didn't teddy bear... care to provide a quote? :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

mellie
Posts: 10199
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by mellie » Fri Aug 23, 2013 11:06 pm

Rorschach wrote:I'd give up mel...
You get it, I get it...
ted is a no account with limited comprehension apparently.
No one said Fleming didn't accidentally discover a mould with certain antibiotic properties.
I've posted it several times now an apparently ted still doesn't get it... he is as pedantic and stupid as aussie.
So I'm ignoring his stupidity.
Perhaps this might help some who struggle....


There were many who had discovered the moulds antimicrobial properties, and long before Fleming.

Fleming didn’t really do much other than observe, grow and distribute a pure strain of the mould ...Penicillium notatum.

Not penicillin the DRUG itself as he lacked the expertise to stabilise the culture for medicinal commercial use.



There were plenty before Fleming who's scientific research was either ignored or dismissed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_of_penicillin

A decade later...In Oxford, Australian Howard Walter Florey organised his large and very skilled biochemical research team, notable among them Ernst Boris Chain and Norman Heatley, to undertake innovative work to produce a stable penicillin.

Penicillin is a group of antibiotics derived from the penicillium fungi.

Penecillin itself is neither a mould or a fungi...it;s a compound.

And old Flem boy did not discover the compound Penicillin, because he lacked the pharmacological expertise required to produce it.

Ted, your problem is you are confusing Penicillin (the stable compound/drug) with the culture, penecillium.

Thats the last thing I’ll say on the matter.

8-)

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:56 am

Rorschach wrote:
hard to surround someone from a distance. or with a nation in between.

The US military doesn't think so:
In addition to the site on Saipan, the Air Force plans to send aircraft on regular deployments to bases ranging from Australia to India as part of its bulked up force in the Pacific. These plans include regular deployments to Royal Australian Air Force bases at Darwin and Tindal, Changi East air base in Singapore, Korat air base in Thailand, Trivandrum in India, and possibly bases at Cubi Point and Puerto Princesa in the Philippines and airfields in Indonesia and Malaysia, a top U.S. Air Force general revealed last month.
http://killerapps.foreignpolicy.com/pos ... tary_bases

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:00 am

China too was once a most inventive place and oft imitated ... many centuries ago. Now it is America's turn to be inventive and imitated around the world. America's asset (currently) is risk taking. Without a culture of risk taking inventiveness doesn't matter much. The new comes from the US and is imitated elsewhere and not because of their education system but because of the culture of risk taking.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by Rorschach » Sat Aug 24, 2013 9:17 am

AiA in Atlanta wrote:
Rorschach wrote:
hard to surround someone from a distance. or with a nation in between.

The US military doesn't think so:
In addition to the site on Saipan, the Air Force plans to send aircraft on regular deployments to bases ranging from Australia to India as part of its bulked up force in the Pacific. These plans include regular deployments to Royal Australian Air Force bases at Darwin and Tindal, Changi East air base in Singapore, Korat air base in Thailand, Trivandrum in India, and possibly bases at Cubi Point and Puerto Princesa in the Philippines and airfields in Indonesia and Malaysia, a top U.S. Air Force general revealed last month.
http://killerapps.foreignpolicy.com/pos ... tary_bases
Well we all know how good at thinking the US military are don't we. I see no support of your "surround" idea in that quote by the way. If they wanted to surround China they'd be in Indonesia or Borneo and perhaps even PNG.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:10 am

It isn't my idea. The US is encircling China and Australia is involved.

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by mantra » Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:58 am

AiA in Atlanta wrote:It isn't my idea. The US is encircling China and Australia is involved.
We certainly are, but at this stage through surveillance mainly. Our participation isn't helping our relationship with China.

Aldebaran5

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by Aldebaran5 » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:17 pm

mellie wrote:Singapore’s president is not unlike Australia’s Governor General Quentin Bryce.

His duties are merely ceremonial, unlike a true republics President, such as Americas Obama BinLaden...eer, rather Borak Osama, sorry, I always get the two mixed up.
I think you're getting hung up on the US style of Republic. Singapore has a different model of Republic, usually referred to as a Parliamentary Republic. Another example of this is Germany (Bundesrepublik Deutschland).

If Australia was to move away from the Constitutional Monarchy (IMO why fix what isn't broken ?) then the parliamentary republic style would be the best fit. Alternatively, a federation (like Canada) or a Confederation (like Switzerland) would also work with minimal change.

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Should Australia become a republic?

Post by Super Nova » Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:08 pm

Aldebaran5 wrote:
mellie wrote:Singapore’s president is not unlike Australia’s Governor General Quentin Bryce.

His duties are merely ceremonial, unlike a true republics President, such as Americas Obama BinLaden...eer, rather Borak Osama, sorry, I always get the two mixed up.
I think you're getting hung up on the US style of Republic. Singapore has a different model of Republic, usually referred to as a Parliamentary Republic. Another example of this is Germany (Bundesrepublik Deutschland).

If Australia was to move away from the Constitutional Monarchy (IMO why fix what isn't broken ?) then the parliamentary republic style would be the best fit. Alternatively, a federation (like Canada) or a Confederation (like Switzerland) would also work with minimal change.
Yes I agree. It needs to be one of minimal change where the power of the parliament isn't watered down with a new political head of state. I isn't broken why fix it argument I think is valid.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests