Fleadriver have you got anything better to do than trying to come here and disrupt the forum with your useless dribble,If you want to have a real debate with links and more than one liners pick a subject.freediver wrote:And to make matters worse he is getting way behind on his stamp licking duties.
VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- HIGHERBEAM
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
Will the Board survive under this Admin? Yes
Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes.
Confucius
ut operor nos ban monachus
Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes.
Confucius
ut operor nos ban monachus
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
OK. How about we discuss why Aussie's referendum is a really bad idea?
- HIGHERBEAM
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
As usual you have one liners and no links to your reference areas,just what I expect Fleadriver.
Will the Board survive under this Admin? Yes
Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes.
Confucius
ut operor nos ban monachus
Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes.
Confucius
ut operor nos ban monachus
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
FD and I have been arguing the case. For that we get told we are making ourselves unpopular/ridiculous whatever.
No one has honestly argued the merits or otherwise of Aussie’s amendment with us.
No one has honestly argued the merits or otherwise of Aussie’s amendment with us.
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
The merit of the amendment is that a petition will not be allowed to stand for ridiculous lengths of time in order to gather enough signatures. Allowing very long times for a petition to stand means:
1. Initial signatories may no longer agree, or may have left or been banned. Circumstances surrounding signatories change.
2. if the petition stands for along time, then the issue that gave rise to the petition in the first place may well not be the reason the petition is signed by someone later on. Thus initial signatories and later signatories may not be in agreement. (For instance- a petition against aussie might be started because of - say- editing time limits. As a result of the petition starting aussie may adjust them slightly, then someone a month later might sign the petition because they don't like the adjustment.) Circumstances on the forum change.
3. Temporary new members (IE Kiwi-Dave) could join up, acquire a brief but sufficient posting history, and vote, in order to get the petition passed.
4. If there is good reason that is apparent to most members, and they rate the reason of sufficient concern, then a petition should be easily passed within a relatively short time frame - it should not need 3 months or more to pass.
1. Initial signatories may no longer agree, or may have left or been banned. Circumstances surrounding signatories change.
2. if the petition stands for along time, then the issue that gave rise to the petition in the first place may well not be the reason the petition is signed by someone later on. Thus initial signatories and later signatories may not be in agreement. (For instance- a petition against aussie might be started because of - say- editing time limits. As a result of the petition starting aussie may adjust them slightly, then someone a month later might sign the petition because they don't like the adjustment.) Circumstances on the forum change.
3. Temporary new members (IE Kiwi-Dave) could join up, acquire a brief but sufficient posting history, and vote, in order to get the petition passed.
4. If there is good reason that is apparent to most members, and they rate the reason of sufficient concern, then a petition should be easily passed within a relatively short time frame - it should not need 3 months or more to pass.
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
So Rainbow - what about those meatpuppets who have come or will come out of the woodwork to vote in favour of Aussie's and your amendment? Why should their vote be included? Most of them aren't active or regular members. I think you should have some say because you've been around for a long time - but there have to be some compromises to suit all the members. Petitions should go for the whole year. It also gives some sort of assessment as to how the Administrator or moderators have been performing over a long period.
Last edited by mantra on Fri May 13, 2011 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
Aussies friends from the taxi forum are welcome here. And they should be able to vote this time, as kiwi-dave did previously.
However, in Aussie's new constitution (the constitution thread, not the amendment thread) I think there is a provision he is suggesting that members have to be active for a reasonable time making a reasonable number of posts prior to signing a petition- ie meat puppets wouldn't count, unless they were regular posters here. (And in that case they wouldn't be meat puppets. ) I support that idea he has for the new constitution.
However, in Aussie's new constitution (the constitution thread, not the amendment thread) I think there is a provision he is suggesting that members have to be active for a reasonable time making a reasonable number of posts prior to signing a petition- ie meat puppets wouldn't count, unless they were regular posters here. (And in that case they wouldn't be meat puppets. ) I support that idea he has for the new constitution.
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
I am fine with all that, ele, but not for a Petition to unseat an Admin, what was solved with kiwi_dave would destroy the board if the kiwi_dave mechanism cannot be used and no other mechanism existed. Currently, no alternative mechanism to unseat an Admin exists and so I will not, can not, support the amendment in its current form.
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
Oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes I vote no, no no oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes oh yes
Re: VOTE NO ON AUSSIE'S REFERENDUM
There IS a mechanism, and it is mischievous of you to suggest there is not one. In two months, get enough aye votes in a Petition and Bob's yer Uncle. If Admin genuinely is crap, there will be a rush of Members signing up within a week.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests