Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Sciences, Environmental/Climate issues, Academia and Technical interests
User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by freediver » Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:33 pm

I merely pointed out that to be virtuous there must first be a moral code.
Could not a virtuous man develop a moral code by virtue of his virtues? It seems like a virtuous thing to do.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by Rorschach » Mon Jun 29, 2015 6:36 pm

He could, but why would he?
What makes him think he is virtuous in the first place.

Society deems what is morally correct and therefore what is virtuous.

To create your own moral code and hence what is virtuous according to you would hold no weight.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by boxy » Mon Jun 29, 2015 8:50 pm

That's quite a philosophy, you have there :?
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by freediver » Mon Jun 29, 2015 9:42 pm

He could, but why would he?
What makes him think he is virtuous in the first place.
He is a humble man who does it merely because he is virtuous, not to extol his own virtue. You need not thank him.
Society deems what is morally correct and therefore what is virtuous.
To create your own moral code and hence what is virtuous according to you would hold no weight.
What is society but a collective of individuals? It holds weight by virtue of it's virtuousness.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by Rorschach » Wed Jul 01, 2015 6:27 pm

freediver wrote:
He could, but why would he?
What makes him think he is virtuous in the first place.
He is a humble man who does it merely because he is virtuous, not to extol his own virtue. You need not thank him.
Society deems what is morally correct and therefore what is virtuous.
To create your own moral code and hence what is virtuous according to you would hold no weight.
What is society but a collective of individuals? It holds weight by virtue of it's virtuousness.
I doubt a humble man would trouble himself with virtues.
BTW you are also ignoring the fact that what is virtuous in one society is not in another.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by freediver » Wed Jul 01, 2015 7:49 pm

Can you give some examples?

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by Rorschach » Wed Jul 01, 2015 8:51 pm

Islam...
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by freediver » Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:11 pm

Islam's problems are largely political. They failed in establishing a moral code, and equated the moral with the legal. They consider the same basic acts to be virtuous. They just consider a lot of nasty things to be permissible and necessary. They allow them into the moral code, without considering them virtuous. This is the root of much of the contradiction within Islam.

Islam is actually aggressively virtuous. They don't go on about not being 'holier than thou'. They are holier than you and they want you to know it. It is a big selling point for them, perhaps second only to the victimhood narrative.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by Rorschach » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:55 pm

They have a moral code, it is spelled out as a way of life... political and otherwise in the Koran and the hadiths etc...
they have different moral values and as such hold different things virtuous.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Did Affluence Spur the Rise of Modern Religions?

Post by freediver » Fri Jul 03, 2015 9:50 pm

Yet if you speak to a Muslim about it they clearly hold the same things to be virtuous. Even the lunatics. Same virtues. Different moral code.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests