A Short History of Political Animal

[IQS.RLOW]

Only to be expected from you. I wonder why I waste my time. None of ye here at the moment choose to see the elephants in the PA Room. Ye are either Forgers, Pornographers, Desposts or apologists for all of them.

I wonder why you waste ours, cocksocket?

The biggest dipshit dictator to ever slime into a PA is you. Hated from left to right and all avenues in between. Whines about PMs being posted and then posts them himself- what a fucking hypocrite you are

Fuck off and die you piece of fucking shit eating yellow choad guzzling jiggaboo fucker

[Aussie]

A silence from me makes none of them true, and is never evidence of anything at all other than the fact I ignored them.

This is true but what is also true is the fact that it makes you look pretty stupid and complicit!

Perception is the basis of most opinions

How wierd. How dishonest. How disingenuous, how ignorant can anyone get?

Some Loony can run around flapping their gums, and a person who ignores it all is regarded as a Loony.............through something conveniently called 'perception' as though that will make a giraffe a gnu because a 'perception' is there.

Mellie posts the most ridiculous crap which I also ignore. There are insane Posts all over OzPol which I also ignore. Does your 'perception' establish that I therefore must be as stupid as those Posters, complicit with them and in accord with their views?

[Black Orchid]

Some Loony can run around flapping their gums, and a person who ignores it all is regarded as a Loony.............through something conveniently called 'perception' as though that will make a giraffe a gnu because a 'perception' is there.

Mellie posts the most ridiculous crap which I also ignore. There are insane Posts all over OzPol which I also ignore. Does your 'perception' establish that I therefore must be as stupid as those Posters, complicit with them and in accord with their views?

If said loony was using me as a pawn and constantly alluding to the fact that we were in cahoots, and we weren't, I would set the record straight. Most people would

You don't

So perception holds

[Jovial Monk]

Perception would hold IF Aussie responded to her posts.

[IQS.RLOW]

Perception would hold IF Aussie responded to her posts.

He PMd her encouragement. Incitement=guilty

[Jovial Monk]

Did he? Got any evidence of that?

[Aussie]

If said loony was ............... constantly alluding to the fact that we were in cahoots............

If Lisa ever posted that I was in 'cahoots' with her, I would have been all over it, and slam dunked her into oblivion. When you read here what I have typed as my position is when you can accept it as my position. What others say is for them, and here at PA, you will find thousands of posts made by dummies who have tried to put me in a box of their making.

Not my problem. I think boxy called it 'observational bias' in another, yet relevant, context.

[IQS.RLOW]

If Lisa ever posted that I was in 'cahoots' with her, I would have been all over it, and slam dunked her into oblivion

She did and you didn't

[AiA in Atlanta]

If Lisa ever posted that I was in 'cahoots' with her, I would have been all over it, and slam dunked her into oblivion.

Really? You were in cahoots with her at your own board and that exchange was posted here and I don't recall you dunking her into oblivion either here or there. Instead you tried to dunk me into oblivion ... and failed.

[Super Nova]

This thread needs special recognition in the History Thread.

Aussie running around to employ a PC Geek to show him how to do a screenshot.

Also, clear evidence of Aussie running to rescue Lisa, something he said he didn't do.

http://ozpolitic.com/polanimal/viewtopi ... 457#p77457

And this was the screenshot of a PM he was so unhappy about.