Evolution is not a scientific theory

[freediver]

It is not a question of science. It is a question of philosophy.

[IQS.RLOW]

It is not a question of science. It is a question of philosophy.

Even if you now try and change your argument to to one of a philosophic nature, how do you reconcile your philosophy with respect to climate change theory and evolutionary theory?

[O Jesus Christ]

Stupid SN, who doesn’t grasp the distinction between a Law that just describes a relationship and a theory that attempts to explain something now drags in Kant! This comes from giving google to the uneducated and stupid!

You watch and SN will be dribbling on about the noumenon and the phenomenon before long, and getting it all wrong.

[IQS.RLOW]

Fuck off back to the kitchen Monk

The men are talking

[hahahaha]

And who do you count among the men? Not yourself, surely!

[IQS.RLOW]

And who do you count among the men?

The ones that don't have a sandy vagina like you do

[freediver]

Even if you now try and change your argument to to one of a philosophic nature

Whether evolution is a scientific theory has always been a philosophical question. Do you think you can do an experiment to determine the answer? I have told you from the beginning that I am not saying evolution is wrong. You just didn't seem to notice.

[gizmo_2655]

Even if you now try and change your argument to to one of a philosophic nature

Whether evolution is a scientific theory has always been a philosophical question. Do you think you can do an experiment to determine the answer? I have told you from the beginning that I am not saying evolution is wrong. You just didn't seem to notice.

Well lots of people HAVE done experiments that confirm 'evolution'...

[Dumb, Dumber and Dumbest]

Can you link to just one such experiment, jizmo?

[IQS.RLOW]

Even if you now try and change your argument to to one of a philosophic nature

Whether evolution is a scientific theory has always been a philosophical question. Do you think you can do an experiment to determine the answer? I have told you from the beginning that I am not saying evolution is wrong. You just didn't seem to notice.

No it hasnt - you might believe it is, but it isn't. That frame of thought is a very recent introduction by God botherers trying to discredit the theory without offering a hypothesis or refutation of their own. Simply saying 'it is untestable' shows you are either ignorant to the many studies and sciences that have been verified to confirm beyond reasonable doubt that the TOE is the only and best accepted answer available.

Of course, this is always open to scrutiny from valid sources and your blog isn't one of them. Funnily enough, you don't demand the same level of scrutiny for your pet projects like the theory of AGW- in that instance you think the science is settled and wholesale changes to the economy and life as we know it need to change without question

You say its not wrong but you are also not saying it is right or the best answer we have available to us at this moment, therefore you are saying it should not be a science but a philosophy.

You are saying this on a continuous and regular basis and even have dedicated a good proportion of your blog to trying to convince others that it is not scientific.
The scientific community disagrees with you.

Coming from an arts degree background such as economics I am not surprised you misunderstand