You ARE an anti–semite Mantra, Jew hater!Isn't Romney a Jew also?
You would be the only person in the world not to know Romney is a Mormon.
You ARE an anti–semite Mantra, Jew hater!Isn't Romney a Jew also?
What's the difference?Neferti~ wrote: Mitt Romney is a Mormon (and a Piscean, I note).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney
The doctrines of the Latter Day Saint movement, commonly referred to as Mormonism, teach that its adherents are either direct descendants of the House of Israel, or are adopted into it. As such, Judaism is foundational to the history of Mormonism; the Jewish people are considered a covenant people of God, held in high esteem, and are respected in the Mormon faith system. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is consequently very philo-Semitic in its doctrine.
Polling has shown that Jews generally view Mormons more positively than any other religious group.[1] Explanations for Jews' high regard for Mormons is speculated to come both from their solidarity with other historically abused religious minorities and the philo-semitism of Mormon theology.
So, unlike Australia where we are obligated to Register on the Electoral Rolls as we turn 18, there is no such thing in the USA. Who would actually KNOW whether a person voted twice? I imagine that even in Oz one could get around that if one was so hell bent on voting numerous times.AiA in Atlanta wrote:Pennsylvania's new voter registration ID law is in the news today. This state has failed to even produce ONE case of voter fraud which this new law is designed to protect against ...
Neferti~ wrote:So, unlike Australia where we are obligated to Register on the Electoral Rolls as we turn 18, there is no such thing in the USA. Who would actually KNOW whether a person voted twice? I imagine that even in Oz one could get around that if one was so hell bent on voting numerous times.AiA in Atlanta wrote:Pennsylvania's new voter registration ID law is in the news today. This state has failed to even produce ONE case of voter fraud which this new law is designed to protect against ...
I think that Australia should not make you attend a Voting Booth. I did get fined $20 some years ago for trying the "system" (in a local by election) I was extremely happy to send a cheque for $20 to The Government.
"In each State". LOL This is where, I think, American has got it all wrong. Probably way too difficult to change now but, surely, commit a crime in one State and get tried in another with entirely different laws MUST cause a lot of problems.AiA in Atlanta wrote:
There is of course an official roll in each state no one is obligated to register. The new laws in some states just make it more difficult for some to vote, which is what the GOP wants as it benefits them. Actually, I prefer the Australian system that requires one to vote. The more who vote, the greater the benefit to society.
Obviously you aren't one of "most of us". Bush initially won in Florida, by a small margin. Gore challenged the results. There were recounts and court cases, and eventually Gore's challenge failed.mantra wrote:AnimalMother wrote: Most of us can remember when Bush became president. He spat the dummy when he initially didn't win
There have been plenty of allegations of voting fraud in Pennsylvania, but no criminal convictions in the last five years. Of course, since voters are not required to prove their identity, fraud would be difficult to prove.AiA in Atlanta wrote:Pennsylvania's new voter registration ID law is in the news today. This state has failed to even produce ONE case of voter fraud which this new law is designed to protect against ...
I'm sorry - but I should have said "most of us - excluding the yanks of course" when I made that statement. Bush wasn't popular globally. The vote re-count wasn't statewide was it - only in a couple of electorates or whatever they call them over there? That's why I was querying whether the Supreme Court Judge/s were Republicans.AnimalMother wrote:Obviously you aren't one of "most of us". Bush initially won in Florida, by a small margin. Gore challenged the results. There were recounts and court cases, and eventually Gore's challenge failed.mantra wrote:AnimalMother wrote: Most of us can remember when Bush became president. He spat the dummy when he initially didn't win
Democrats have a hard time with history.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests