More aid - less war

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

More aid - less war

Post by mantra » Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:56 am

We've been in Afghanistan since 2001 "liberating" their people with bombs. The Coalition of the Willing has spent trillions ensuring that their nuclear weapons were the best and most effective - consideration of the troops has possibly come second and the Afghani people are at the bottom of a long list of more important projects.

With all the foreign manpower, latest medical equipment and weaponry, why are there still people existing who haven't had medical assistance in a decade?

One reason could be that we've bombed all the hospitals and those few remaining have been in the process of being rebuilt for years. Afghanistan is now supposed to be a democratic country, but it still remains primitive - more primitive in fact than it was a decade ago.

If 10% all the trillions spent on nuclear warheads could have been invested in the betterment of the people in these war torn countries - perhaps we wouldn't have the global refugee problem which is becoming worse each day.

Where are the American medicos?
IT has been nine years since the people of Chuckajuy in eastern Oruzgan Province had any medical support.

This week, Australian military medics conducted a clinic in the medieval village bazaar and 100 people flocked in from near and far.

Sadly, none were women.

In this isolated region of Afghanistan, women remain indoors or hidden behind a burqa and the idea that they could be treated by male medics, let alone foreign men, is as abstract as primary school education.

Children in these struggling mountain villages spend their days tending goats or working the fields and, like one young girl whose leg was fractured two years ago and not properly set, they carry illnesses with them like Australian kids carry toys.

Many injuries are tended by local "witch doctors" who rely on remedies like tomato soup to treat serious burns.

Small, undernourished boys and girls, 40 year-old men who looked 60, and 60-year-old men who looked 80 lined up to consult the Aussie medics and their Afghan comrades.

Kids looked on wide-eyed as their brothers or sisters received the first real medical care of their young lives.

The medics did what they could for a variety of ailments and dispensed simple medicines, using sign language to convey the dosages. Local man Hamadullah, 35 (but looking 70), said the people were happy that medical help had finally arrived.

"It has been nine or 10 years since we had any help here," he said through an interpreter.

Mentoring team commander Captain Dean Schmidt, 48, from Brisbane, said word about the clinic had only gone out the day before and yet people had trekked for hours from isolated valleys to get medical care.

"I have never seen a crowd like this since I have been in Afghanistan," he said.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/a ... 6341322376" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Mattus
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:04 pm
Location: Internationalist

Re: More aid - less war

Post by Mattus » Sat Apr 28, 2012 5:37 pm

mantra wrote: Where are the American medicos?
In American hospitals?

A better question is why aren't you, mantra, getting on a plane with a stethoscope and sphygmomanometer and saving some Afghani babies, instead of expecting some American medico to do it?
"I may be the first man to put a testicle in Germaine Greer's mouth"

-Heston Blumenthal

Skull Cap

Re: More aid - less war

Post by Skull Cap » Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:54 pm

I don't know Mantra but perhaps like me, she has no idea what a stethoscope and sphygmomanometer are?

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: More aid - less war

Post by mantra » Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:04 pm

Mattus wrote:
mantra wrote: Where are the American medicos?
In American hospitals?

A better question is why aren't you, mantra, getting on a plane with a stethoscope and sphygmomanometer and saving some Afghani babies, instead of expecting some American medico to do it?
Good suggestion mattus! I just never thought about doing that.
Skull Cap wrote:I don't know Mantra but perhaps like me, she has no idea what a stethoscope and sphygmomanometer are?
I know what a stethoscope is - but I had to google sphygmomanometer, which in simple terms is an instrument used to measure blood pressure.

Skull Cap

Re: More aid - less war

Post by Skull Cap » Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:36 pm

Good suggestion mattus! I just never thought about doing that.
Are you now off to Afghanistan?

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: More aid - less war

Post by mantra » Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:21 am

Skull Cap wrote:
Good suggestion mattus! I just never thought about doing that.
Are you now off to Afghanistan?
Unfortunately for the time being I'm needed here to save babies - but in all seriousness our soldiers have at least started to make an effort to help the sick.

Most of the casualties are caused by air strikes - children losing their arms and legs and help if they know where to get it is hours away. Many hospitals are padlocked and even if they weren't - there are no medical supplies to treat the critically ill. We keep on bombing though regardless of the women and children being the main victims.

The number of wounded are increasing.


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests