Mattus wrote:mellie wrote:
Accidents they understate.
Is it understated? I'm no radiologist, but from what I can gather you could probably safely bathe in the water that was leaked. If a single person drank all 1.5 tonnes of the water, they would be exposed to the same dose as having had 20 mammograms.
You also failed to mention that the leak occurred during shut down of the reactor. That is, they are shutting down their nuclear power plant in response to safety concerns raised at Fuku. Which seems to be exactly what you're asking for, so why the complaint?
From what you gather, or from what you have vaguely deduced from the scant information they have provided us with?
The fact that these "lil spills' continue to occur minus the details being released to the public, much less MSM is a concern in itself.
All these little spills add up, this and take their toll.
Do you know how long uranium takes to break down in our environment?
Take a guess Mattus.
Hint, never, not completely anyway, and what's deemed a 'safe' level is merely subjective theory in itself at this point, given scientists are still ascertaining 'safe' levels environmentally speaking over the long term with respects to repeated 'smaller' spills just like this.
What may seem like a safe 'leak' today, may in fact be what's responsible for environmental chaos tomorrow, so unless you have a crystal ball Mattus....
Just have to wait and see , this and continue playing around with radioactive substances in volatile and geologically 'unstable regions ie, Japan until then I guess.
Furthermore Mattus...
http://www.infomag.nl/nieuws_item/2012/ ... ive-water/
