Azaria: Revisited

[boxy]

Don't be silly, Mattus. Divorce is always conclusive PROOF that on or the other partner is a baby eating bastard... why else would anyone get divorced!

[Super Nova]

Before:
After: [/quote]

Wow, major transformation after these years. The dingo missed a feast if he waited 30 years and went for the mummy instead.

I don't know if they did or not. From what I recall the media turned on her because she didn't show the sterio typical emotions of a mother who has lost a child to the media. Terrible if they were truly innocent.

[Bart]

Looks like Lindy ate the baby!

[Super Nova]

Looks like Lindy ate the baby!

No you are completely wrong. Babies are low carb, high protein and good for you.

[Bart]

Looks like Lindy ate the baby!

No you are completely wrong. Babies are low carb, high protein and good for you.

[mellie]

Bart, I think you had better read this... It was Lindy who asked Michael for a divorce, and there appears to have been some NT government involvement, possible corruption with respects to the deliberate withholding of evidence, if only for a brief period of time.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/35121321/Li ... -daughter-

[Bart]

Bart, I think you had better read this... It was Lindy who asked Michael for a divorce, and there appears to have been some NT government involvement, possible corruption with respects to the deliberate withholding of evidence, if only for a brief period of time.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/35121321/Li ... -daughter-

Probably Lindy found out that Mikey was going to spill the beans on her unless she gave him the divorce
WHo'd want a bean bag for a wife anyway, especially one that he suspected off serving up baby food in the kangaroo casserole.
No wonder Azaria wasn't found!

[mellie]

What do you think about the Chamberlains selling their deceased infants clothing to a museum?

http://www.nma.gov.au/shared/libraries/ ... erlain.pdf

Take a look at some of the exhibits...and the chronology of events.

17 August 1980 Azaria Chamberlain disappears from a camping ground at Ayers Rock.

24 August 1980 Azaria’s clothing found at the base of the Rock, near some dingo lairs, about 4km away from the camp site.
15 December – 20 December 1980
Coroner Dennis Barritt rules that a dingo took Azaria, but there had been intervention by unknown humans in disposing
of the body.

19 September 1981 N.T. Chief Minister orders the renewal of police investigations after hearing that a British expert believed from a study of Azaria’s jumpsuit that her throat had been cut.

20 november 1981 The N.T. Supreme Court quashes the finding of Coroner Barritt.

14 December 1981 – 2 February 1982New Coroner’s inquiry before Coroner Gerry Galvin. Mrs Chamberlain committed for trial for murder, and Mr Chamberlain for being an accessory after the fact. Both released on bail.

13 September 1982 Trial of the Chamberlains in the N.T. Supreme Court at Darwin (transferred from Alice Springs for fear of not being able to find an unbiased jury).

29 october 1982 Mrs Chamberlain found guilty by the jury and sentenced to life imprisonment; Mr Chamberlain also found guilty and given a suspended 18 month sentence.

19 november 1982 Mrs Chamberlain released on bail to appeal to the Federal Court, two days after giving birth to a daughter.
29 April 1983 Leave to appeal to the Federal Court refused.
The Chamberlains seek leave to appeal to the High Court. Mrs Chamberlain
returned to Berrimah jail in Darwin.

1983 Screening of the Australian TV docu-drama, Who Killed Baby Azaria?

22 February 1984 High Court confirms the conviction 3:2.

2 February 1986 A baby’s jacket, identified as Azaria’s, discovered at the base of Ayers Rock near previously unknown dingo lairs.

7 February 1986 N.T. Government release Mrs Chamberlain and announce a Royal Commission into the case—though whatever the findings she will not be returned to jail.

8 May 1986 – 22 May 1987
Royal Commission sits in Darwin, Melbourne and Sydney. Justice Morling concludes that the Chamberlains’ conviction
ought not to stand.

1986 Publication of the influential book about the case, Evil Angels, by John Bryson.

1987 Release of the film Evil Angels starring Meryl Streep.

June 1987 N.T. Government announces that the Chamberlains are pardoned.

15 September 1988 N.T. Supreme Court reviews the case and declares the conviction quashed.

July 1990 N.T. Government and the Chamberlains fail to come to any agreement over compensation.

1992 Chamberlains were awarded AU$1.3 million in compensation for wrongful imprisonment, a sum that covered
approximately one quarter of their legal expenses.

1992 Lindy remarries, becomes Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton.

December 1995 Third inquest before Coroner John Lowndes finds that ‘Azaria Chantel Loren Chamberlain died at Ayers Rock on 17 August 1980. As to the cause of her death and the manner in which she died the evidence adduced does not enable me to say.I therefore return an open finding and record the cause and manner of death as unknown.’

2002 The opera Lindy performed for the first time, at the Sydney Opera House.

2004 Screening of Australian mini-series Through My Eyes, based on Lindy Chamberlain’s autobiography.

[mellie]

No, she in true cult-following form met up with a seminar speaker in the US, so decided to marry him within 2 years of her divorce proceedings to Michael.



A good read, even if the author appears to be pro-Lindy, some of the facts herein are important, perhaps unbeknown to the biased author at the time he wrote this piece.

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/f ... count.html

[mellie]

Would you sell your deceased child's clothing and memorabilia to a museum?

No animal saliva was found on any of the the babies clothing, however dozens of Dingoes were slaughtered near the camp site following the infants disappearance, with a view to finding evidence in their stomachs.

No evidence was found within the stomachs of dozens of dingoes shot surrounding the camp site either.
_______________

Now whether or not you believe a Dingo took her baby, human intervention is evident when it came to the placement, and obvious tampering of clothing/evidence, whereby officials tried to conceal their having found the child's matinee jacket, of which in itself is a bit of a mystery, yes?



The saliva DNA in preserved samples is stable for more than 2 years at room temperature....which might explain why 'officials' decided to hold onto the matinee jacket for a little while longer, just to be on the safe side.

I think you will find there never was saliva on the child's clothing.

And who has the evidence now?

The Australian national museum!

http://www.nma.gov.au/shared/libraries/ ... erlain.pdf


There are too many people in high places involved in this case for the Chamberlains not to have been pardoned.,,then later the charges quashed.

The church paid their legals, government officials and police were involved in concealing evidence, ie the matinee jacket.

The media made a killing, the story made headlines globally.

Too many people stood to lose should we finally get to the bottom of this mystery, perhaps in 50 years or so we might, long after those involved have deceased.