UN installed rebels juice over Gaddafis rotting corpse

[mantra]

The west will probably regret helping to bring down Gaddafi. The pro-Gaddafi supporters are one-by-one being executed. These executors will soon be in control of the country. Extremists much?

I hope I'm wrong.

I don't think you are. The West seems to revel in killing off leaders who don't co-operate and these nations end up a whole lot worse than they were before. It's always the same old story ... oil - Libya having the largest reserve in Africa - and gas. Murder the leader then plunder the resources.

[mellie]

Yep, and I think what irks me most is how the UK are beating up their victory as though they gave birth to democracy themselves. -Vomits-

Who needs enemies with headlines like these, urging England's allies to keep near, safety in numbers apparently.

"Gaddafi dead: our Armed Forces did us proud in Libya"


Success against Gaddafi must lead to even greater co-operation among our allies, says Gen Sir David Richards.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/pers ... Libya.html

Dream on!!!

[mellie]

42 years of tyranny and cruelty towards his people?

Your Excellency?


Well according to this letter found amongst Gaddafi's possessions, Prince Charles was rather complimentary, fawning over him in a letter he'd sent to Gadaffi back in 2007.


'Your Excellency': Charles's fawning letter to Gaddafi discovered at one of despot's palaces

The heir to the throne called for greater ties between Britain and Libya in his letter
Prince praised dictator for his work with Christians, Aids victims and the British Council

A fawning letter sent by Prince Charles to Colonel Gaddafi has been discovered at one of the despot’s palaces in Libya.

Addressing the dictator as ‘Your Excellency’, the heir to the throne called for greater ties between the two nations.

It is the latest embarrassing link to emerge between the British Establishment and Gaddafi’s hated regime, and follows revelations his brother Prince Andrew was also used as a go-between.

Prince Charles’s letter is dated June 7, 2007, and was discovered in a palace used by Saif al-Islam, Gaddafi’s playboy London-educated son.

In the letter, the Prince praised the dictator for his work with Christians, Aids victims and the British Council, and writes: ‘I just wanted to write to Your Excellency to say how heartened I am by the breadth of these developments.’





Charles’s letter was sent just a week after Tony Blair had visited Libya in his final weeks as Prime Minister to seek oil and defence deals for British companies.

The Prince went on to say he had been briefed on Mr Blair’s trip and ‘the positive way in which relations between Libya and the United Kingdom are developing’.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml



A second letter to Gaddafi was sent by Mr Blair a month later, stressing the determination of his government to pursue deals with the Tripoli regime.

Both letters, seen by The Times newspaper, preceded an agreement to provide an advanced air defence system – which would have been designed to thwart just such an attack as the Nato campaign to unseat Gaddafi.

In September, Prince Andrew’s role was revealed in papers discovered at the British ambassador’s residence in Tripoli.

The Duke was offered up to meet Colonel Gaddafi as the Labour government desperately tried to appease the unpredictable dictator.



He was used as a go-between as ministers sought ways to calm down the Libyan despot over fears he would launch holy war on the UK.

The files reveal a gushing letter written by then-PM Gordon Brown in September 2007 to Gaddafi urging him to meet Andrew, who has always denied acting improperly.

Last night royal sources said the Charles letter was nothing to do with defence contracts - but rather was aimed at helping international efforts to free six Bulgarian nurses imprisoned since 1998 after being falsely accused of infecting Libyan children with AIDS/HIV.

The group was initially sentenced to death but this was commuted to life imprisonment, and they were released following years of intense negotiations involving countries across Europe.

At the request of the Government, the Prince of Wales 'quietly' joined the effort and sent what was described as a 'discreet' letter to Gaddafi.

'The charges were clearly trumped up and Governments across the EU were involved in the campaign for their release,' a senior royal source told the Mail last night.

'The British Labour Government was part of that attempt and asked the Prince to write a very discreet, carefully-worded letter as part of their efforts. There was no direct reference to the Bulgarians but rather a coded message - a veiled reference, if you like - in which he attempted to bring influence to bear.

'This was not something that the Prince chose to do off his own back. It was a piece of international diplomacy at the request of the government.'

A Clarence House spokesman said it was difficult to comment without seeing the letter for authenticity but added: 'Any such letters written by the Prince are generally written at the request of the Government and in support of Government objectives.'

A spokesman for Mr Blair said: ‘Gaddafi was received in several European capitals, including Brussels, Rome and Paris.

‘There was, therefore, at that time no reason whatsoever for not continuing to engage with him, especially since Mr Blair in office had been responsible for getting Gaddafi to give up his chemical and nuclear weapons programme and renounce terrorism.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml

[mellie]

Royal pigs, i'm ashamed of my mother country, never in my life have I felt so ashamed of my western civilization.

Hypocrisy in all it's glory.

Theres no justifying this atrocity.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zi0qxqSVXo

Could this be the man NATO paid to take the blame for murdering Gaddafi and his family in cold blood?

We can see who the despots are, and it wasn't Gaddafi.

Mongrels.


Ps- The nurses weren't falsely accused at all.


And no, a republic is not desirable, especially so now, because as soon as we become a Republic the mongrels will see us as fair game and come in and swoop on our resources also.
Well, whats left of them.

[mellie]

I'd like to see her Majesty explain this.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml

Is Queen Elizabeth now a political refugee, here in Australia seeking refuge due to war crimes?

No wonder she and Gillard hit it off.

Time she went home to face the music, and took Gillard with her.

I don't care how old she is, this is an absolute disgrace.

I hope Prince Williams different, this cant go on.

[boxy]

Still praising the socialist paradise, Mellie

[mellie]

You have no idea what you are talking about, just fling terms around and think others who read your junk cant see you are missing a few springs.

Some ignorants labeled Gaddafi a socialist revolutionary, fact is, he was merely protectionist, wasn't "socialist" by our western standards, was a right-wing conservative.

Are you able to define what Libya was before NATO came in with a red bulldozer?

Because I sure as hell cant coin it, though unlike yourself, I have enough grace to shut my face and not try to coin it with tired western designs until I am able to.

Boxy, you really are ignorant and stale.

Go wash out your box.

[boxy]

Socialist is a term he chose to use... there is nothing wrong with socialism, and it all sounds great, in theory.

Third International Theory

Implementation in Libya
The theory was partially implemented in Libya. In March 1977, the "Declaration of Sabha" was declared, and the republic was transformed into a Jamahiriya (the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya). Those forms of private ownership which were deemed exploitative were abolished (whereas private family businesses in the service sector were preserved).

With the advent of globalization and the information revolution Gaddafi slightly modified his theory by introducing a thesis about the era of large spaces in which the nation-state is becoming inviable. The word "Jamahiriya" (Arabic: جماهيرية‎ jamāhīriyyah, approximately "[state] of the masses") is an Arabic neologism. It is the feminine nisba adjective formed from the term "Jamahir" (masses). It echoes the Arabic term for "Republic", "Jumhuriyah" (formally the feminine nisba adjective from Jumhur "people") .

Gaddafi's "Jamahiriya" form of government was supposed to be different from both the monarchy and the republic, hence the name of "Third" International Theory.

Politics and government of Libya under Gaddafi
Under Gaddafi, Libya was governed by a military regime professing the idea of Arab nationalism, socialism, and Islam. The highest state authority was the General People's Congress (GPC), consisting of representatives of People's Committees. In practice, the GPC had the functions of a parliament. Its members were elected at local and regional levels, although part of them were assigned by Gaddafi personally. Gaddafi also appointed his ministers from among the members of the GPC. While Gaddafi himself did not hold any official posts, he remained the leading political figure in Libya.

Islam is the state religion of Libya, but the influence of the Muslim clergy is limited. Direct democracy has been declared in the country and oil revenues make it possible to maintain a high standard of living for the Libyan population. The presence of foreign capital is reduced, the enterprises in the sphere of large and medium industry are owned by the state.

The basis of justice is the Quran. Judicial proceedings are conducted by a hierarchical system of courts. Small lawsuits are considered in the Magistrates' Courts. Next come the Courts of the First Stage, the Appellate Courts and the Supreme Court.

The official main principle of government in Libya was: "Power, wealth and weapons - in the hands of the people."

[mellie]

http://www.international.to/index.php?o ... &Itemid=84

I think you have confused socialism with nationalism Boxy.

Understandable, given our government preaches one thing and does the direct opposite.

For other ideologies and groups called National Socialism, see Nazism.

[boxy]

He was both