Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by boxy » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:15 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:
if you want them outlawed...
Who said I want them outlawed?
Why would I want to outlaw my target practice?
Blah, blah, blah... talk's cheap, Travis.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by IQS.RLOW » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:19 pm

You give too much credit to just another useless socialist fuckwad lawyer who thought they could 'change the world'.

It will all be undone again. They never last long enough
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by mellie » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:19 pm

boxy wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:
if you want them outlawed...
Who said I want them outlawed?
Why would I want to outlaw my target practice?
Blah, blah, blah... talk's cheap, Travis.
IQS isn't Travis, if anything boxy, you are more likely to be Travis yourself.
ha ha

I'll give you a "red" star for trying though.

-Smirk

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by mellie » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:20 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:You give too much credit to just another useless socialist fuckwad lawyer who thought they could 'change the world'.

It will all be undone again. They never last long enough

I know... but it's always a pleasure watching them try.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by boxy » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:22 pm

mellie wrote:
boxy wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:Who said I want them outlawed?
Why would I want to outlaw my target practice?
Blah, blah, blah... talk's cheap, Travis.
IQS isn't Travis, if anything boxy, you are more likely to be Travis yourself.
ha ha

I'll give you a "red" star for trying though.

-Smirk
Oh, FFS. It was a reference to Travis Bickle, not your imaginary, internet delusions, you crazy old fruitbat.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by boxy » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:24 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:You give too much credit to just another useless socialist fuckwad lawyer who thought they could 'change the world'.

It will all be undone again. They never last long enough
So, you think we should be able to just ban people's opinions because they are unpopular, instead of having to prove that they are harmful through the courts?

Interesting.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by mellie » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:25 pm

"Oh, FFS. It was a reference to Travis Bickle, not your imaginary, internet delusions, you crazy old fruitbat"- The Taxi Driver


-Smirk

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by boxy » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:29 pm

"You talkin' to me?... :x "
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by IQS.RLOW » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:37 pm

boxy wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:You give too much credit to just another useless socialist fuckwad lawyer who thought they could 'change the world'.

It will all be undone again. They never last long enough
So, you think we should be able to just ban people's opinions because they are unpopular, instead of having to prove that they are harmful through the courts?

Interesting.
You misunderstand. I don't think people should be banned because they are unpopular.
I think they should be shot
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Reds move-in on Wall Street Occupy

Post by mellie » Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:37 pm

boxy wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:You give too much credit to just another useless socialist fuckwad lawyer who thought they could 'change the world'.

It will all be undone again. They never last long enough
So, you think we should be able to just ban people's opinions because they are unpopular, instead of having to prove that they are harmful through the courts?

Interesting.
So, if someone registered something called the "Australian Paedophile Party" or "Australian Terrorist Party." would this be OK...


Communist movements have demonstrated themselves to be socially and economically destructive world wide...give me one example of a balanced, ethical communist government.

It's not the views, or even the party's often deluded young members itself thats of concern, it's the red- bureaucracy and less known traitors behind it intentionally deceiving others into fighting a cause they wouldn't support in a pink fit if they knew what it really was, of which is to destabalise their own nation.

This is why communism doesn't work in mature western democracies....because sane thinking people object to others telling them not to think, hence Labor have to immigrate from impoverished communist or war-torn nations to increase their vote base.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests