households MUCH better under Labor

[mellie]

To the contrary, struggling families will be by far, much worse off irrespective of Gillards acclaimed "government assistance" should a go-it-alone carbon-tax stay.

At the end of the day, it comes down to dollars and cents, pity Gillard lacks both.

A carbon-tax is bad for our economy, is a sovereign risk, and stands to fatigue all bar the globalist corps purse strings over time.

Skippy, you lack foresight and logic, you are too busy thinking about the $3.40 p/w you might get tacked onto your dole cheque, when in fact, no body, rich, middle or poor (Unless you are who forms the top 20% and have shares in global corps) will be better off in the long run.

Phase 2 of this package is the ETS, thats when those receiving benefits will feel it most, if this thing is allowed to pass, which I doubt.

The Carbon-tax, NBN, and EU's globalist designs on a smart-grid appeals to our fascist-reds, this and depends on thick heads like you who have little regard for your nations sovereignty and your children's future.

My understanding is you are gay skip, this and don't have children to worry about, of course, Hitler didn't have children either.

Why should Australia prop-up the EU's economy?

Charity begins at home, not with bad policy.

This government has been a most family-unfriendly and treasonous government indeed.

Understandable, given it's GALP, and flanked with radical climate extremists who believe in a 1 child policy and who continue to strive for a communist republic.

Congrats for having ACP (Australian Communist Party) registered this year, after having dissolved then reorganised in 1991.

Prepare to dissolve again.

[skippy]

No one believes your lies, moron,fuck off, you have been exposed as a lying piece of shit,AGAIN.

[skippy]

My understanding is you are gay skip, this and don't have children to worry about, of course, Hitler didn't have children either

my understanding of you is that you breed morons, just like yourself.

[IQS.RLOW]

middle-income families $1.30 ahead and high-income families (the top 20 per cent) are $6.30 a week worse off.

Thats 80% of people who will be worse off or make no fucking difference and you watch that $1.30 pittance get blown away by a govt who have already lost control of the purse strings. Even their advertising budget for this crap has blown out by double and it hasn't even started.

Why do you have so much faith in this bunch of fuckwits skip? Is it because you are a fuckwit yourself?

fuck you're even more stupid than I thought,IQ the C@P you put up tells you the number worse off and you still cant work it out. At least you're not as dumb as mel, YET.

Look you numbnut fucking jizz depository

It shows that low-income families with children (the bottom 20 per cent) are on average $6.30 a week ahead, middle-income families $1.30 ahead and high-income families (the top 20 per cent) are $6.30 a week worse off.

Only 20% will be any better off and this will soon be gobbled up by massive increases above CPI and runaway expenditure by your filthy little bedbugs, that leave 80% who will be worse off or the pittance will make no difference.

No wonder you are a fan of this tax and government. Basic maths is beyond you..

Even political science courses have an expectation of some basic maths. No wonder you failed and dropped out...loser

[skippy]

the top 20 per cent) are $6.30 a week worse off

if you aren't carful IQ you're going to look as big a dumfuck as mel.b
hint for IQ I've posted the number considered to be worse off, but is he smart enough to understand?, I doubt it

[IQS.RLOW]

the top 20 per cent) are $6.30 a week worse off

if you aren't carful IQ you're going to look as big a dumfuck as mel.b
hint for IQ I've posted the number considered to be worse off, but is he smart enough to understand?, I doubt it

And I have posted who are going to be worse off...and that includes the 60% who get your pathetic $1.30/week. They will end up being worse off.

Go back to proimary school and enrol in basic math. Uni was obviously waaaaaaayyyy beyond your level

[skippy]

the top 20 per cent) are $6.30 a week worse off

if you aren't carful IQ you're going to look as big a dumfuck as mel.b
hint for IQ I've posted the number considered to be worse off, but is he smart enough to understand?, I doubt it

And I have posted who are going to be worse off...and that includes the 60% who get your pathetic $1.30/week. They will end up being worse off.

Go back to proimary school and enrol in basic math. Uni was obviously waaaaaaayyyy beyond your level

They dont get 1.30 a week,fuckwit, they ;re 1.30 a week better off AFTER their compensation, goodness gracious me, we have another person giving mel a run for her money as the biggest dumb fuck on the forum,you surprise me IQ I always thought you were brighter than that, an arrogant piece of shit, but brighter, it looks like mel being around has dumbed you down.Thanks for ther laughs though, i'm sure EVERYONE will get a real giggle out of your stupidity.

[IQS.RLOW]

Look you homo hobo sausage wallet

$1.30 is sweet fuck all and I have already pointed out that the tax will rise faster than CPI which is what the compo will rise at= anyone getting $1.30 will be worse off after 1 year, let alone after you greeny fucks try to push it up and up and up and up.

I realise you think that because you get your $6 you are over the moon because that would probably double your personal household contribution

You economic illiterate cumdump

[skippy]

Look you homo hobo sausage wallet

$1.30 is sweet fuck all and I have already pointed out that the tax will rise faster than CPI which is what the compo will rise at= anyone getting $1.30 will be worse off after 1 year, let alone after you greeny fucks try to push it up and up and up and up.

I realise you think that because you get your $6 you are over the moon because that would probably double your personal household contribution

You economic illiterate cumdump

You goota love sperm breaths grasp of the English language,a true poet.

You economic illiterate cumdump