Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by mellie » Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:17 pm

Could it be time Bob Brown apologised also?

http://www.openaustralia.org/regmem/sca ... _10696.pdf

User avatar
skippy
Posts: 5239
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by skippy » Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:43 pm

The days of monk flooding the forum with shit are starting to look good in comparison to this fucking nut job moron, talk about spam.

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by mellie » Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:49 pm

Cheers Skip, it's been fun, but it's time I hit the road, my not wanting to wear my welcome out or anything...-Smirk

See you later.


:thumb

User avatar
skippy
Posts: 5239
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by skippy » Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:55 pm

mellie wrote:Cheers Skip, it's been fun, but it's time I hit the road, my not wanting to wear my welcome out or anything...-Smirk

See you later.


:thumb
This forum needs posters, but your spam will not attract them, its no better than monks.
You should have thought about wearing your welcome out before you spammed the forum with your usual shit, mind your ass on the door as you leave.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:19 pm

skippy wrote:Waaaahhhhhh someone is writing bad things about my bum buddy Bob.
:roll:

Did you notice most people consider your wanking mate dangerous skip?
Poll: Which would your preferred description of Bob Brown be?

Courageous
15%
Cunning
8%
Principled
29%
Dangerous
41%
Pragmatic
2%
Misunderstood
5%

Total votes: 19355.
Shame there is no option for "dead"
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
skippy
Posts: 5239
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by skippy » Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:36 pm

People can write what they like sperm breath, but they should try to limit it to facts instead of made up fairy tales like mel does.
I like mel, even tho she's a pain in the ass, but she has a bad habit of making shit up, when she can learn to tell the truth I'll welcome her back, until then she can fuck off, like you do, when I kick your ass on a daily basis. :lol:

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by mellie » Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:41 pm

"Yea the anti Labor media campaign has worked a real treat." - Skippy

Has it occurred to you that Gillard has noone other than herself and ALP's king-makers to blame for having not out-performed the predecessor she toppled?

Lets face it Skip, her failings as PM aside, she's performed dismally, and whether you want to admit this to yourself or continue blaming Abbott, the press, and anyone else who springs to mind, the horse just didn't get up.

The carnival is over, the spectators have gone home, but Gillards still running a 3-legged horse race round the track by herself, and whats worse, she's defiant, knows exactly how Australians and even her own party feels about her though doesn't particularly care.

I have only ever known one person like her, and this person was a sociopath.

What do I dislike the most about Gillard?

Her falseness and blatant disregard for those such as yourself who really had faith in her, this and didn't think she'd amount to what she has, possibly Australia's most disliked PM we've ever endured.

Because normally when the public expresses this much contempt for a leader, the party either deals with it themselves, (new leadership) or rarely, a GG steps in as a last resort.

She toppled Rudd on the basis of the following...

-The party had lost it's way
-Rudd was performing badly in the polls
-being an ineffective (She claimed he had no sense of purpose)
-His over-compensatory personality made him abrasive, appear smug, conceited, overly self assured, arrogant.
-His complex often irritable moods probably irritated colleagues.
-He failed to meet his objective, ETS & or a republic.

Now go through the above list and tell me which of the above doesn't apply to Gillard herself.

At least Rudd knew when to call it quits, Gillards quite pathological...indifferent to what her nation thinks of her, doesn't appear to care.

She has made it clear, "I will go when I'm good and ready" and theres nothing we can do about it , well, to her way of thinking anyway.


She's wrong, she'll end up a cot-case by the end of it.

:)

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by mellie » Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:39 pm

And as for your claim a hate campaign worked a real treat, (was the ruination of Gillard) Skip, this is what politicians and the media do OK, they tear one another to threads, as can be demonstrated by her attempting to do the exact same thing to Howard, by her own admission.

Politics is a blood sport, and if you aren't prepared to cop it on the chin, this and cant cope with the splatter, this or feel you need to change media laws to "shelter" yourself from those nasty wasty big bad meanies, then you have to ask yourself, is this really the job for you?

"It was hoped if we derided John Howard as a 1950s throw back, Australia
would reject him."-Gillard 2006

"It was hoped if people woke up to his use of the politics of fear, Howard
would fail." -Gillard 2006

http://www.fabian.org.au/1047.asp

What about Global warming, and scaring the hell out of our pacific/torres strait islanders who think the sky is falling and that they might disappear into the sea or into some phenomenal weather-related sinkhole?


Along with her threats of sacking leakers, in her words "rats"..when referring to her own cabinet?

More recently, her fear mongering re- what her response to a terrorist attack on home soil might present like in our media.

Did we really need the sneak-preview?

http://www.news.com.au/national/reveale ... 6169257257

At least Howard had a valid reason to be concerned, re- Bali and 9/11...along with Australians training, and being caught red-handed with explosives, and or trying to break into military barracks etc.

Want the truth?

You don't know half of it, because for every 5 home-based plot interceptions, the media only learned of one or two...at best. Many weren't even Muslims, just freaking loons.

Why? Because like riots, it's infectious, the trend starts up, it gets splashed across the media, suddenly they are heroes wanting notoriety, similar to how shootings and even suicides often occur in spades, it only takes a couple to start the trend....or in the case of the Cronulla Riots, a few to start a fight on a beach... monkey see, monkey do.

Nothing brings a nation together like a drama or tragedy, ask Anna Bligh, the princess of darkness herself.

Labor are guilty for their fair share of theatrics, in fact, their entire tenure has been one big soap opera.
Look how they beat that pitiful Cyclone Yasi up...was a media-storm in a teacup. ..likewise with the QLD floods.

FEAR...TRAGEDY...TERROR....Sigh~!

It cuts both ways skip, and tell me, what do you make of this rather premature alarmism?

Or is it a subtle threat from the bored and despotic as to what might happen if we don't approve of her carbon-tax, or continue muckraking.

http://www.news.com.au/national/reveale ... 6169257257

Cant take it, don't dish it.

User avatar
skippy
Posts: 5239
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by skippy » Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:45 pm

it's time I hit the road, my not wanting to wear my welcome out
I knew this was too good to be true, just like monk.

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Ombudsman apologises for writing questions

Post by mellie » Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:04 pm

Your problem is your laziness.

What do you want skip, would you like me to post elsewhere so you can get on with the job of whacking off over whatever it is you come here to whack off over?

Clearly it's not politics... or do you just need a hug?

All you want to do is shit-stir and derail topics, and experience tells me either you're bored or just come here to be a pest.

You seem to prefer engaging in flirtatious or catty little gossip threads down stairs, ...well, great, be my guest, but why disrupt the threads up here just because you cant get it up, or lack the gumption to defend your preferred politician?

I'll ask you once more...what do you make of this sneak-preview as to what Gillard might say in the event tragedy strikes?

Take a look at her facial expression.....*laughs* she should have been on the stage.

Or is this her warped way of demonstrating leadership potential, before the fact?

Really, I think the death-stare was a bit of an over-kill, she should save it for those hateful Fabian conventions and take her rolling-pin with her.

http://www.news.com.au/national/reveale ... 6169257257

Fairdinkum you're a gutless prick Skip.

:)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests