Ethical Dilemmas

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Shared Puppet
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:41 am

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by Shared Puppet » Thu May 19, 2011 11:41 am

Hebe wrote:Bloody terrible spelling in those days. :bgrin
Indeed:


Sayeth Sappho, "For certeyn, olde Aussie, by your leave/You shall have queynte right enough at eve ... What aileth you to grouche thus and groan?/Monk, Is it for ye would have my queynte alone?"
Fie, fie, you counterfeit. You puppet, you!

Outlaw Yogi

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu May 19, 2011 3:15 pm

Jovial Monk wrote: that is how she became “a disgusting bitch.”
How did you become a disgusting bitch?

Rainbow Moonlight
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:23 pm

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by Rainbow Moonlight » Thu May 19, 2011 4:58 pm

Socky the Sock. wrote:
Rainbow Moonlight wrote:The private citizen's account is dormant. They are not using the money. She is paying it back. Her daughter's life was at stake. She owed more duty to her daughter than to the bank. I don't think it is wrong to steal to keep your child alive. (If you have no other way to do so.)
You are suggesting that money which is not being used after 5 years in an untouched account is up for grabs. Aside from life saving surgery, is there any other reason why stealing from those accounts would be justified. What if a woman has been denied further government funding for facial reconstruction resulting from DV because the compensation outlay of 10 years ago has been paid in full. But this new technique, unavailable then, will level out her eyes giving her a more human looking face. Can she hack the bank to access dormant accounts? She assures us that she will pay it back.
No, that would be wrong. :)

Socky the Sock.

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by Socky the Sock. » Fri May 20, 2011 5:13 pm

Shared Puppet wrote:And prively he caughte hire by the queynte,
And seyde, "Ywis, but if ich have my wille,
For deerne love of thee, lemman, I spille."
This clerk was called the clever Nicholas;
Of secret loves he knew and their solace;
And he kept counsel, too, for he was sly...

Socky the Sock.

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by Socky the Sock. » Wed May 25, 2011 9:10 pm

Could you clean out the off topic stuff in this one too please Annie or Pasta

Jovial Monk

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by Jovial Monk » Wed May 25, 2011 9:29 pm

HTFU Princess.

Should have seen the barrage of emotional bullshit and insults hurled at me in the amendment thread, I didn’t have a little cry about it.

sprintcyclist
Posts: 7007
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by sprintcyclist » Wed May 25, 2011 10:38 pm

too busy huffing and puffing after poochy were you ?
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.

Aussie

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by Aussie » Wed May 25, 2011 11:01 pm

Socky the Sock. wrote:Could you clean out the off topic stuff in this one too please Annie or Pasta
No way. Go and read back up there ^^^^^. You derailed the Thread, and now you cry poor.

Nah.

:yak yak

Socky the Sock.

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by Socky the Sock. » Thu May 26, 2011 12:44 am

Aussie wrote:
Socky the Sock. wrote:Could you clean out the off topic stuff in this one too please Annie or Pasta
No way. Go and read back up there ^^^^^. You derailed the Thread, and now you cry poor.

Nah.

:yak yak
If you haven't noticed... it was Monk who derailed the thread with his claim that I was talking about bank loyalty... even after telling him repeatedly that I was not... he provided no quote to my doing this because he couldn't... I never once mentioned or alluded to bank loyalty... but that Monk loves to shit stir and was looking to settle into a game of 'yes you were'/'no I wasn't'. All I did was nip it in the bud before he got settled because believe it or not Aussie... I DID NOT SET UP THIS THREAD SO THAT THE LIKES OF MONK COULD SHIT IN IT!
Socky the Sock. wrote:
Jovial Monk wrote:Don’t move the goal posts.

Banks, employers more generally, are very selfserving when it comes to their employees with the top execs now taking home 100x the average salary at a company rather than 10x as used to be the case before neocon fuckery became established.
This is about stealing money from private citizens with dormant bank accounts. It has nothing to do with self serving employers.
That was strike one...
Socky the Sock. wrote:
Jovial Monk wrote:You were talking about loyalty to a bank.
No, I am talking about money held by private citizens in banks being stolen.
That was strike two...
Socky the Sock. wrote:
Jovial Monk wrote:But you were also talking about loyalty to the bank.
No I wasn't talking about loyalty to the bank and the fact that you keep on saying it without linking to the evidence which supports your claim proves it.

I know what you are doing Monk... you are trying to get rid of me by baiting me... just as you got rid of mantra by baiting her. And didn't you have fun with that...

Let's check for evidence shall we?
On his own forum, in forum watch, Monk wrote:Having great fun baiting that disgusting bitch Mantra on the other board.
You are as evil as Deepshit... and your baiting has worked... the thread is fucked now and I've given up trying to create things to talk about. You are an asshole.
Strike three and we have a definite shit stirring habit formed. No point continuing on with Ele whilst Spam the Man is hell bent on fucking it up for us.

Now... who derailed the thread? Not me! I was as fair. I clearly gave him the benefit of the doubt until it his dishonourable intent became obvious.

Looks to me like you are trying to find excuses for the favouritism you and your mods show Lisa. If this was Lisa's thread it would have been cleaned up ages ago.

User avatar
lisa jones
Posts: 11228
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm

Re: Ethical Dilemmas

Post by lisa jones » Thu May 26, 2011 1:00 am

FFS Sappho .. I took you off ignore this evening in the vain hope that you had improved somewhat.

Even a cursory glance shows that Monk was attempting to engage you within the parameters of the topic's discussion. There's nothing untoward in what Monk has stated in here. If anything .. he has demonstrated that he is indeed an analytical contributor who is able to hold his argument well! If only we could all be like that!

And Aussie's quite right .. it was YOU who started the BS and the baiting in here. It was YOU who pushed Monk NOT the other way round. If Aussie was to actually carry out your request .. then YOUR posts would be deleted you fool!

Read your own posts again. Oh and stop quoting my name whenever you decide to spit your dummy in all your frigging posts. It's bloody annoying and reminiscent of troll obsession.

Night.
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests