Constitutional reform

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Aussie

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by Aussie » Thu May 19, 2011 10:48 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:That Petition is about Annie/Monk. Stop fucking around FFS!
No. In the OP of that Thread, NOIQ refers very specifically to Annie. The Thread stays.

:mad

Jovial Monk

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu May 19, 2011 11:02 pm

Yeah, he lies about Annie sharing her account. You are a false friend to Annie.

Aussie

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by Aussie » Thu May 19, 2011 11:12 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:Yeah, he lies about Annie sharing her account. You are a false friend to Annie.
Lies.....yes, in my opinion, they are. But....I do not have the right to nuke Constitutional Petition Threads just because I believe it is based on lies. Gosh, just look at your Petition to oust me as Admin. It is based on 100% bullshit from you.....but the Constitution prevents me acting to nuke it, so I will not, just like I will not on the "Annie" Petition.

Annie knows she has my 100% support and loyalty.

:PC

Jovial Monk

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu May 19, 2011 11:50 pm

Words. Actions speak louder than words.

Jovial Monk

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by Jovial Monk » Fri May 20, 2011 5:11 pm

Not a single person here believes IQ’s Petition is about Annie. That includes you, Aussie.

Aussie

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by Aussie » Fri May 20, 2011 5:28 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:Not a single person here believes IQ’s Petition is about Annie. That includes you, Aussie.
It cannot be about anyone else. Annie is a Mod............so it is very clear the Petition is about my appointment of her, and even Annie agrees. So....STFU, Monk.

:du

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by freediver » Sat May 21, 2011 9:23 am

How's this?

This is the constitution of the Democratic Dictatorship of Political Animal. If there is any ambiguity or confusion in it's interpretation, or omissions, the follow two principles apply.

1) This constitution is designed and intended to limit the power of exalted leader. The rational interpretation that places the greatest restriction on exalted leader's authority, and the greatest power in the hands of members, shall prevail.

2) If there is a precedent, use it.

There will be fresh elections for the position of exalted leader at least every twelve months. An early election or a referendum can be called at any time on the whim of exalted leader, or via petition.

Petitions

A petition can be used to trigger an election for the position of exalted leader or to trigger a referendum. A petition will be deemed successful if the number of signatories meets or exceeds the magic number. The magic number is calculated as follows: take the number of valid votes from the last election, divide by two, round up if necessary (by adding 0.5), then subtract the number of people who submitted a valid vote in that election who are currently unable to sign due to the actions of the admin (eg if they are banned or suspended). The signature of a banned member is not counted if the magic number has already been reduced on their account. All petitions remain active until they succeed or the current exalted leader is replaced with someone else. Once a referendum or election is triggered by a petition, it cannot be 'untriggered'.

Relevant petitions may not be deleted by admin. To be relevant, a petition must either call for an election, a referendum (alteration to the constitution) or an enforceable change to the administration/moderation of the forum. In addition, the opening post of the petition thread must be limited to explaining the proposal. It may not contain any promotion of the proposal or personal criticism of other members, admin or moderators. Responses to the petition are limited to a single post with a single word indicating support for the proposal, otherwise the post may be deleted or edited by admin. Opposition to the petition may not be expressed on the petition.

Referenda

A referendum can be used to alter the constitution or overrule a decision of exalted leader, for example to reinstate a banned member. A referendum that obtains over 50% approval will be deemed a bloody good idea and will be passed. Anything less and the proposal will be deemed indecent. A referendum can be triggered by petition or by exalted leader.

Voting

All voting and petition signatures must be made public - no secret ballots. One vote per person. All voting will be based on mixed runoff and instant runoff elections. Voters may rank candidates, in which case preference distribution will be instantaneous at the close of polls. If this proves insufficient to reach a decision without disenfranchising any voters, one additional runoff round will be held. Only those members who voted for excluded candidates and did not allocate sufficient preferences need recast their vote in a runoff round. The option to change votes will be extended to all who have already voted, but only for the reduced candidate pool. A referendum may have more than two options, providing they are clearly defined.

A vote, election or referendum thread should be pinned and should contain the word 'VOTE', 'ELECTION' or 'REFERENDUM' in capitals in the thread title. Voting should be open for at least seven days. In addition, the opening post of the thread must be limited to explaining the proposal. It may not contain any promotion of the proposal or personal criticism of other members, admin or moderators. Admin may edit the opening post to enforce this. Votes are limited to a single post with a single word indicating support for or opposition to the proposal, otherwise the post may be edited by admin. Multiple posts may be deleted, provided the vote remains.

Elections

All candidate nominations must be made on the forum by an enfranchised member. However, if a candidate is unable to accept on the forum, they may accept externally, provided it can be verified.

Role of exalted leader

Exalted leader has authority over forum policy and the day to day administration of the forum. This includes:

* appointing moderators
* deleting, editing and banning
* forum settings and forum layout, within the limitations imposed by the forum software

Exalted leader is servant of members, not master. Exalted leader has special constitutional powers to call an election or referendum at any time, without requiring a petition. Where a provision of the constitution undermines the authority of exalted leader, exalted leader is obliged to support the provision. This obligation comes without authority over the constitution or it's interpretation. That is, exalted leader is to serve the people via the constitution, but does not have final say on any constitutional matter. Exalted leader must facilitate the expression of the will of the members through constitutional processes by:

* helping members to use the constitution
* counting votes and signatures
* suggesting the outcome of an election or referendum
* suggesting the magic number

Rules

Personal information about other forum users must not be posted without their consent, which can be withdrawn at any time. This includes anything related to their true identity, for example a first name or nickname, ISP, IP number, location etc

Jovial Monk

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by Jovial Monk » Sat May 21, 2011 12:06 pm

It is a bit more detailed so I like it and suggest everyone else does. I can see more that should be included but don’t have the time to write a set of suggestions up.

A Charter of Moderation is missing, governing behavior by both Admin/mod and members—call it Posting Guidelines if you like.

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by freediver » Sat May 21, 2011 12:33 pm

If there is something you think should be added that most people will support now is the time to do it. We don't bother making changes very often so this could be your last chance for a long time.

Jovial Monk

Re: Constitutional reform

Post by Jovial Monk » Sat May 21, 2011 12:47 pm

Could admin be responsible for posting a set of Posting Guidelines within a month of taking office and that these become binding on Admin, mods and members? I think that would be good.

What is acceptable or not, mod action to be taken etc. Mods act on Admin policy—so write it down and publish it. Sorry, can’t be more detailed now.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests