Bannings

[Rainbow Moonlight]

I think Monk is fond of annie and gets upset if people attack her. For good reason- she is a very nice person. I put up with Iq for ages, and even as a mod, so i dunno why you shouldn't put up with Monk mantra.

[mantra]

I do put up with Monk. I could have had him banned prior to the election for his excessive abuse but said no. IQ's protests are far less frequent than Monks and not nearly as nasty.

[Socky the Sock.]

I do put up with Monk. I could have had him banned prior to the election for his excessive abuse but said no. IQ's protests are far less frequent than Monks and not nearly as nasty.

And that's the key to all of this. IQ is over the top vulgar and not necessarily nasty... which you often are Monk. So vulgar is out and nasty is in?

[Rainbow Moonlight]

Rubbish. What IQ wrote regarding aussie's wife and family was very very nasty. PA has generally allowed vulgarity apart from the c word and not allowed abuse of a member's family or publication of someone's personal real life details- instant ban offence.

[mantra]

Rubbish back to you Rainbow. Monk has been foul to me as well as to Aussie in his violent abuse. On Mother's Day he told me I was one of the most despised people on the net - I may very well be, but he is the most despised - so he's one up on me. Why is this OK, but a reference to a member's "unknown" relative worse? Just because the words aren't being said to you doesn't mean that they're benign. Aussie's got a thick skin - he banned IQ on a rule because IQ put on a performance in objection to "Annie's" and Aussie's demands. Why aren't there any rules which apply to Monk?

Monk is nasty almost every time he posts here - as well as being very personal in his attacks.

[Rainbow Moonlight]

I don't like nastiness- but at this time we dont have a rule against it or a tradition against it. But we do have oen against abuse of a family member. I think there should be a rule against constant or continual harrassment too, and from tiem to time PA moderators have used a commosnense approach to enforce soemthign liek this based on moderator discretion.

[Jovial Monk]

Mantra is lucky that rule is not in force or she would be banned for constantly telling lies about Annie.

Abuse can come in many ways and I find Mantra’s whispering against Annie as one of the worst forms of abuse.

I am more open, if I think someone is an arsehole I will say so and why.

[annielaurie]

Aussie's got a thick skin - he banned IQ on a rule because IQ put on a performance in objection to "Annie's" and Aussie's demands. Why aren't there any rules which apply to Monk?

I'm not sure I understand this part of your post, Mantra. And why has my name got quotes around it?

[Jovial Monk]

IQ got suspended for a month for attacking someone’s family. Nothing to do with Annie. I am getting very sick and tired of Mantra’s lies. I have never attacked anyone’s family.

[annielaurie]

IQ got suspended for a month for attacking someone’s family. Nothing to do with Annie. I am getting very sick and tired of Mantra’s lies. I have never attacked anyone’s family.

This is true, Monk. IQ got suspended for attacking family members, something we don't do here on PA. She twists almost literally every subject somehow to make it my fault, or suggest that I had something to do with it, or it was because of me somehow, and then she adds her little twist to it, the quotes around my name, as if to indicate that I'm not a real person. This is typical of the kind of lies Mantra tells about someone she doesn't like ..