New Constitution

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: New Constitution

Post by mantra » Thu May 05, 2011 11:51 am

Jovial Monk wrote:You sad old bitch! You have no idea what “vexatious litigation” is, do you Mantra?
You vicious old queen - do you?
Annie is the best thing to happen to this board in years!
Says you. Any other moderator would have banned you by now. You really have got a potty mouth. In fact prior to the election - I was given the option of having you banned because of your vile abuse, but as the elections were approaching and I'm fair minded - I resisted the temptation to see the last of you. What a mistake that was. An affirmative response might have changed the course of PA history.

Jovial Monk

Re: New Constitution

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu May 05, 2011 11:57 am

Rather a potty mouth than a malicious yet dimwitted bitch!

Obviously, you do not have a clue what vexatious litigation is!

I suggest you find work, paid or volunteer and you may become a more normal human being. You obviously do not have the mental and spiritual resources to sit at home doing nothing all day. That is why I suggest you find some work, you might become human again.

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: New Constitution

Post by mantra » Thu May 05, 2011 12:04 pm

That's hilarious. Is Lisa really one of your socks? If not you're doing a fantastic impersonation. You really have forgotten whether you're an Arthur or a Martha. :lol:

Jovial Monk

Re: New Constitution

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu May 05, 2011 12:08 pm

You think it is hilarious that you are turning into a dunce, into a sour, malicious old bitch?

Find some work Mantra, get among people and become human again—you will thank me for this suggestion! Yes, I am very suggestive!

Aussie

Re: New Constitution

Post by Aussie » Thu May 05, 2011 6:01 pm

mantra wrote:The thread stays as it states in the Constitution. Seeing as there is no longer going to be a new Constitution - it will remain for the year or until the required number of ayes have been recorded. Aussie has already told you this. It's not going to be removed just because you demand it. The moderator had no right to sneak around behind Aussie's back and hide the thread - that was an anti-constitutional breach.

If it was susceptible to becoming "vexatious" litigation - the resident lawyer or FD would have had it removed by now.

There is one solution - sack Annie and then the thread can be laid to rest.
mantra, where do you get this rubbish that there will not be a new Constitution? There will be, and it will deal with the current absurd position about the 'life' of Petitions. What do you reckon, mantra. After how long from commencement ought they close?

Further, we have this absurd position under the current Constitution because there is no provision for when a Petition comes to an end.

And mantra.....no moderator snuck around my back at all on this matter. That the thread had been moved was perfectly obvious, and whoever moved it could only have done so not understanding the ridiculous position the current Constitution provides for. Cease making a mountain out of that mole hill. I have not bothered to check which of freediver, Annie or Pasta moved it.....because I do not care. I 'apologised' out of courtesy, because I am certain whoever moved it did so in good faith. I wanted to make it clear that my reversal of their act was not in any way a criticism. And, by the way, I have nil regard for your oft posted remarks that if something happens here, you are to contact freediver. I could not care less what he is told, assuming he is unable to see for himself.

Jovial Monk

Re: New Constitution

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu May 05, 2011 6:06 pm

It is not a valid Petition. Why the FUCK are you keeping this alive, Aussie? Got plans to get rid of Annie some time?

Aussie

Re: New Constitution

Post by Aussie » Thu May 05, 2011 6:10 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:It is not a valid Petition. Why the FUCK are you keeping this alive, Aussie? Got plans to get rid of Annie some time?
Have you actually bothered to read the current Constitution? I reckon you have not, hence your stupid claims about validity.

Annie stays, and the only person making any reference to 'plans' is you. Further, I reckon you ought cease trying to use Annie as a wedge.

Jovial Monk

Re: New Constitution

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu May 05, 2011 6:20 pm

I reckon you should delete an invalid, vexatious and totally bullshit Petition. Support your Mods, moron.

Aussie

Re: New Constitution

Post by Aussie » Thu May 05, 2011 6:23 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:I reckon you should delete an invalid, vexatious and totally bullshit Petition.
I agree it is vexatious (just like your Petition is) it is totally bullshit (just like your Petition is), but it is valid, and as such I will not remove it, (just like your is valid, and as such I will not remove it either.)

What is good for the goose has to be good for the gander too, wot?

8-)

Jovial Monk

Re: New Constitution

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu May 05, 2011 6:30 pm

It is not valid—you said an earlier Petition of mine was invalid yet you accept IQ’s bodgie bullshit as valid? And you think we will aceept your constitution?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests