New Constitution

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: New Constitution

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:05 pm

Sounds lkike a good idea to me aussie
Image

Good dog :roll:
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: New Constitution

Post by freediver » Sun Apr 17, 2011 8:06 pm

Aussie wrote:
freediver wrote:Aussie, I suggest instead of trying to rewrite the whole thing, you figure out what needs to be changed, prioritise, and change one thing at a time. Otherwise, if your proposal involves a dozen changes or so, a lot of people may vote against it because they object to one or another of the changes. Every change you tack on will lose votes, not gain them.
I might do exactly what you did freediver....which was to put one whole document together and offer it up............... It seems you now reckon that was dumb of you.
You might? Are you backpeddalling now? When do you expect to offer it up? Some time in the next decade?

Aussie

Re: New Constitution

Post by Aussie » Sun Apr 17, 2011 8:13 pm

freediver wrote:
Aussie wrote:
freediver wrote:Aussie, I suggest instead of trying to rewrite the whole thing, you figure out what needs to be changed, prioritise, and change one thing at a time. Otherwise, if your proposal involves a dozen changes or so, a lot of people may vote against it because they object to one or another of the changes. Every change you tack on will lose votes, not gain them.
I might do exactly what you did freediver....which was to put one whole document together and offer it up............... It seems you now reckon that was dumb of you.
You might? Are you backpeddalling now? When do you expect to offer it up? Some time in the next decade?
When I am good and ready, freediver. No rush, is there?

I am working on a clause which sets in concrete that any Host of PA has no greater rights than ordinary Member, unless they have been elected as Admin, and that unless they have been so elected, they may not lawfully over-rule or dictate to a duly elected Admin. I will do that, as I have a mandate to do it.

Any suggestions on the way to frame that clause, freediver?

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: New Constitution

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Apr 17, 2011 8:17 pm

I am working on a clause which sets in concrete that any Host of PA has no greater rights than ordinary Member, unless they have been elected as Admin, and that unless they have been so elected, they may not lawfully over-rule or dictate to a duly elected Admin. I will do that, as I have a mandate to do it.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Image
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

deepy

Re: New Constitution

Post by deepy » Sun Apr 17, 2011 8:27 pm

Have you looked at, as IQ subtly suggests, the constitution of, say, Zimbabwe for additional inspiration?




Edit to add: ((hugs))

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: New Constitution

Post by freediver » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:53 pm

When I am good and ready, freediver. No rush, is there?
Not on your part, obviously.
I am working on a clause which sets in concrete that any Host of PA has no greater rights than ordinary Member, unless they have been elected as Admin, and that unless they have been so elected, they may not lawfully over-rule or dictate to a duly elected Admin. I will do that, as I have a mandate to do it.
You are working on it? How hard is it to write? Didn't you just write it down then?
Any suggestions on the way to frame that clause, freediver?
How about "Aussie has taken over, there will be no more elections, and freediver can't do anything about it because of this here piece of paper"?

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: New Constitution

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:00 pm

How about "Aussie has taken over, there will be no more elections, and freediver can't do anything about it because of this here piece of paper"?
I would lol and lmfao if it wasn't so true
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Aussie

Re: New Constitution

Post by Aussie » Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:10 pm

freediver wrote:
When I am good and ready, freediver. No rush, is there?
Not on your part, obviously.
I am working on a clause which sets in concrete that any Host of PA has no greater rights than ordinary Member, unless they have been elected as Admin, and that unless they have been so elected, they may not lawfully over-rule or dictate to a duly elected Admin. I will do that, as I have a mandate to do it.
You are working on it? How hard is it to write? Didn't you just write it down then?
Any suggestions on the way to frame that clause, freediver?
How about "Aussie has taken over, there will be no more elections, and freediver can't do anything about it because of this here piece of paper"?

I am very well aware that to you, freediver, any Constitution the Members agree to is just a piece of paper you can run your Tanks through. But, first....I will put that piece of paper directly in front of your Tank.

;)

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: New Constitution

Post by freediver » Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:42 pm

Will it have anything written on it, or would that be too much to ask? Shouldn't you put it to the members first?

Jovial Monk

Re: New Constitution

Post by Jovial Monk » Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:54 pm

Give it a rest, FD.

I suggest Aussie won’t even start writing for a month or two nor should he.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests