Greens support down another 2% to 10%

[mellie]

The latest telephone Morgan Poll conducted over the last three nights, March 22-24, 2011, shows the L-NP (54.5%, up 4% in a week) now has an election winning lead over the ALP (45.5%, down 4%) on a Two-Party preferred basis. • More electors (33%) say Foreign Affairs Minister Kevin Rudd would represent Australia best Internationally, ahead of Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Coalition Leader Tony Abbott (both 20%) and Malcolm Turnbull (19%). • Amongst ALP supporters Kevin Rudd is supported by 44% just ahead of Julia Gillard 40%. • Amongst L-NP supporters Tony Abbott 39% leads Malcolm Turnbull 29%. Voting Intention The latest telephone Morgan Poll conducted over the last three nights, March 22-24, 2011, shows on a Two-Party preferred basis the L-NP (54.5%, up 4%) now has a large lead over the ALP (45.5%, down 4%). The L-NP primary vote is 47%, ahead of the ALP 34.5%. Support for the minor parties shows the Greens 10%, (down 2%) and Others/ Independents 8.5%, (down 1.5%). Government Confidence Plunges The Roy Morgan Government Confidence Rating has plunged 17 points to 101 (the lowest ever recorded) with 44.5% of Australians saying Australia is 'heading in the right direction,' while 43.5% say Australia is 'heading in the wrong direction.

[mellie]

Greens_wins posted on another forum...

Catholic uni sends anti-Greens message

The entire student body and staff of the Australian Catholic University (ACU) in NSW have been advised to not vote for the Greens at the request of the Australian Catholics Bishops Conference.

Close to 8000 students and 400 academics were sent “The Greens Agenda: A Message from Catholic Bishops in NSW” just five days before the election by ACU’s Directorate of Identity and Mission.

The document warns that the Greens would seek to “force non-government schools to employ teachers whose views, values and lifestyle are contrary to the religious traditions of these schools,” would reduce funding for private schools, and would treat personal drug use as a health and social issue, “and therefore acceptable”.

It also warns that the Greens would remove abortion from the Crimes Act, legalise euthanasia, and push for same-sex marriage.

The Star Observer was contacted by ACU staff and students who were appalled that the university had been used for a political purpose.

A member of ACU’s teaching staff said he strongly objected to the email and colleagues had asked to be removed from the Directorate of Identity and Mission’s database after receiving it.

“Here we have a publicly-funded university whose email system is being used five days out from an election to lobby the entire student population with a strongly political message from a religious organisation,” he said.

“Many of our students are undergraduates and will be first-time voters at this election. It’s hard enough for young people to get involved in the political process without being influenced in this sort of way.”

He said colleagues were concerned about plans by ACU to compel students to undergo two core units in Catholic Identity if the email was any indication of what that would entail.

An ACU student said she was, “stunned, upset and distressed,” after reading the email.

“I felt like my trust had been violated, like the university had invaded my private inbox and then forcefully told me what to think and who to vote for. The more I read, the more angry and ashamed I felt,” she said.

“It was a grossly inappropriate email to send to students. ACU is a public university open to all and receives significant public funding. It should not be party political and should not be telling students who to vote or not vote for.”

An ACU spokeswoman defended the email, saying it merely informed students about Greens policies and was not a directive on how to vote.

“ACU is a Catholic university, and it is therefore appropriate for us to occasionally circulate matters of Catholic interest,” she said.


http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/aus ... s/2011/03/...

How ironic, that a Greens supporter should oppose this, when for starters...

- A prominent Jewish Rabbi and community leader encouraged their own creed to vote Labor last election,(all of which were postal votes given the election fell on the Sabbath) .... even going so far as to ostracise one of their popular publications writers and university student for having openly advised his Jewish readership to vote for who they feel they should vote for, not who their rabbi tells them they should vote for.

-Also, was Bob Brown exploiting public tax-funded Latrobe university administration fees when he viral emailed/spammed thousands upon thousands of people from Latrobe university promoting himself and the Greens in the lead-up to a 2010 election, trashing the coalition in the process any more or less acceptable?


So, good for one or two, but not the other?

More hypocrisy coming from the Green-left loons who's most precious asset is their inherently short memories, of which allows for fresh beginnings each day I guess.

They all do it, it's just the dopey greens who are losing support by the day (now down to 10%) cant sniff past their own hypocrisy enough to realise how pathetic they look accusing the above university of doing exactly what they did themselves at Latrobe University less than 6 months ago.

Note to Greens: Smoking cannabis may result in short term memory loss.

[IQS.RLOW]

You should invite Foolosophy over here so I can tear strips off the little fuck and shoot down his every utterance on climate change and whatever other labor loving babble he chooses to indulge in.

I'd do it over there but leftards are a protected species at ozpol and the leftard mods don't like their views or posters being challenged

[mellie]

You should invite Foolosophy over here so I can tear strips off the little fuck and shoot down his every utterance on climate change and whatever other labor loving babble he chooses to indulge in.

I'd do it over there but leftards are a protected species at ozpol and the leftard mods don't like their views or posters being challenged

No, because I refuse to post on that forum now, after being banned for having brought a relatively minor misdemeanour concerning one of their misbehaving mods abuse of powers to freedivers attention.

Ban me once, shame on me, ban me twice for absolutely nothing, shame on them.

No second chances these days.

I wouldn't give them the satisfaction of my having so much as logged in.

Trust breached.