Is there a role for nuclear energy?

[IQS.RLOW]

Who am I? If you can answer that with a clear mind, I will leave.

It has already been answered back on page 11-12

I know who you are.


You're a fucking moron

And you have done nothing to disparage that. Even boxy, who is the brown shirt waving leftist around these parts recognises you as an embarrassment to 'the cause'

You're the only one who is garbling, VK. It's painfully obvious that even you don't believe the crap you dribble here.

I once sat in the seat as a Liberal minister, got totally fed up with the crap and got out early, sat as an independant 2 elections in a row, now with the gov't in power.

Dear god, don't embarrass yourself any more you delusion fucktard
I gave you a chance to admit your wrong doings but you continue to press ahead with your bullshit.
You should leave now before you really embarrass your leftard brethren

[Viking King.]

Low IQ Wrote;
Dear god, don't embarrass yourself any more you delusion fucktard
I gave you a chance to admit your wrong doings but you continue to press ahead with your bullshit.
You should leave now before you really embarrass your leftard brethren

This is a typical response from a person that knows they are wrong but hate to admit failure.

[mellie]

Viking, IQS has more intelligence in his foreskin than you have in your cavernous skull.

And you know it, it's why you have issues with his often brutal honesty.

[Viking King.]

Viking, IQS has more intelligence in his foreskin than you have in your cavernous skull.

And you know it, it's why you have issues with his often brutal honesty.

"Brutal honesty"
Get real, he has writen nothing at all to be call honest, it just brutal dribble from a lost cause.
nothing thus far by Low IQ has been about fact. just the same as Tony the pesky Wabbott.

[mellie]

Viking, IQS has more intelligence in his foreskin than you have in your cavernous skull.

And you know it, it's why you have issues with his often brutal honesty.

"Brutal honesty"
Get real, he has writen nothing at all to be call honest, it just brutal dribble from a lost cause.
nothing thus far by Low IQ has been about fact. just the same as Tony the pesky Wabbott.

I am entitled to my opinion, sorry, but you lack 'pizazz' 'zest' 'oomph' ...whereas IQS demonstrates a natural inclination for dark biting wit.


Face it, IQS is entertaining, his posts colourful, whereas reading yours are a little rank...may be likened to having dry-sex.

You seem a little jealous, preoccupied with IQS, and like Gillard, forever the bridesmaid never the bride.

Not the elected one anyway.

If you win this election, you will have had to regress to cheating, and we have seen the outcome of this - A half life!

May the better man/woman win.

[Viking King.]

Colourful yes, 7 clours of shit is all it pus out,
fact is, he/she/it is crying like a soccar supporter who's team just lost a game,
The right gov't is in the seat and sucko to him and his supporters,
if it gave colourful constructive comments on a subject with all the biting, others would go with it but it ain't,
Someone put's in a fact from record and the first thing it says "Oh fuck off it's all bull shit"
that's a typical response from a lost ant.

[mellie]

A cursed half life, like the fall of Aussey here once before and over on a number of boards which have now lost their 'pizazz'.

I guess you have to weigh it up, is winning worth allowing this board to regress to what the others did?

If you are a selfish person, this and don't mind compromising this boards freedom of expression, and it's enjoyment factor then I guess so.

Like with Gillard, ok, she may have won, (by way of cheating) though what was the outcome of forcing herself upon a nation who really didn't want her in?

A cursed half life.

[mantra]

I guess you have to weigh it up, is winning worth allowing this board to regress to what the others did?

I'm in total agreement, but sometimes there is so much abuse going on here - you lose sight of the objective of the board. For all the faith you've put in IQ - unfortunately he was accused of hacking someone's account not so long ago. It can't be proved - but suspicion of a member is all it takes to rule them out of a responsible job.

I can't see FD letting anyone he didn't trust administer this board. Swap places with him - would you put details of members in the hands of someone you didn't trust?

[Neferti]

Bob Brown got sucked off this morning.

[Outlaw Yogi]

Japan nuclear crisis: fire in fuel pools 'would raise radiation exposure'
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... -radiation

Nuclear engineers warn there is more radioactive material stored in those pools than in the reactor core – and a fire would increase the chances of radiation spreading.

... "It was a design mistake to put the spent fuel in the same building as the reactor," he said.

The proximity makes it much harder for technicians struggling to cool down the reactor and the spent fuel pool at the same time. "They are Siamese twins, you can't separate them," Lochbaum said.