data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51220/512206fd35840198bd548151de52b5516b1090e2" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
I'm hoping for goules like mantra and hoppy to get a facefull of egg, myself.
No there not. it is japan wearing egg because they dared to place nuke plants on a hyperactive fault line. It is against the conventions in place and there is talk that they will be questioned on it.Outlaw Yogi wrote:ATM, its pro-nukers wearing egg face masks.
Your grammar, and punctuation sucks. Why is it that most times you are on song, and on others you post like a sot?Sappho wrote:No there not. it is japan wearing egg because they dared to place nuke plants on a hyperactive fault line. It is against the conventions in place and there is talk that they will be questioned on it.Outlaw Yogi wrote:ATM, its pro-nukers wearing egg face masks.
Because sometimes I could be bothered to edit and at other times I'm answering the phone or cooking or what ever so rush to the end and hit submit. When rushed I type at more than 100 words per min... with an increased error rate as you have noticed.Ned Kelly wrote:Your grammar, and punctuation sucks. Why is it that most times you are on song, and on others you post like a sot?Sappho wrote:No there not. it is japan wearing egg because they dared to place nuke plants on a hyperactive fault line. It is against the conventions in place and there is talk that they will be questioned on it.Outlaw Yogi wrote:ATM, its pro-nukers wearing egg face masks.
Last Friday there were no threads on the Nippon crisis. I assumed we were all in awe of the magnitude of the tragedy which is still unfolding. Otherwise, I'm pro nuke energy so have no reason to engage anti nuke fear mongers.Oh, so now we get all cute after the event do we? If it was against these alleged 'conventions,' why was there no questioning prior to this week? I swear I never saw one post on the subject by you, Skunk.
You are obviously still 'rushing,' Skunk. Now, the spelling has gone to custard.You will have to ask Japan why they have not questioned the location of their nuke plants Ned. Possibly it has to do with the conflict of interests and/or communication disemination issues between the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy within the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, NISA who reports to them and the Atomic Energy Commission who is supposed to oversea the whole approval process.
LOL... twas one word missing an 's'.Ned Kelly wrote:You are obviously still 'rushing,' Skunk. Now, the spelling has gone to custard.You will have to ask Japan why they have not questioned the location of their nuke plants Ned. Possibly it has to do with the conflict of interests and/or communication disemination issues between the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy within the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, NISA who reports to them and the Atomic Energy Commission who is supposed to oversea the whole approval process.
I said that I don't engage in debate with anti nuke fear mongers.Back to the point. You say you are pro nuclear power, and that because you are 'pro,' you keep secret these alleged 'conventions?'
Try the Nippon Atomic Energy Commission... or for analysis on the matter refer to STRATFOR: Global Intelligence.Where may I find these alleged 'conventions?'
Nah, you can't spell 'oversee' either. And 'twas' is "'twas."LOL... twas one word missing an 's'.
Arrrrssssssiiiiiiie wrote:Now, the spelling has gone to custard.
Arrrssssiiiie wrote:You say you are pro nuclear power, and that because you
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests