Farms and Carbon

[Pastafarian]

That's your theory, and you are entitled to it, as I am mine.

You mean hypothesis

Is Global warming a fact, hypothesis, scientific theory or a belief?

Scientifically speaking.

Scientific theory.

[IQS.RLOW]

However if the money was used to pay for research in this country which is already well progressed in some areas (i.e the polymer solar film idea),

The efficiency will never be viable

again it will take time but then yes we will have an impact on our emissions.

Rubbish

The other benefit of this is we can sell the technology to other countries.

The dream of a carbon retard This will never happen despite retards repeating it.

Perhaps you need to do another couple of units of study? I suggest economics and patent law. At least then you will be full bottle on how naive you really are and you can add to your repertoire of totally useless degrees within Australia

What efficiency would be viable for you IQS?

Something better than what is available from silicone mono-crystaline or amphomorous that is available now- but feel free to think that using more oil and coal to produce inefficient fuel sources to give you a warm fuzzy is good economics

Also does saying rubbish form part of a coherent argument?

I find arguing with retards tedious. Feel free to tell me when your argument isn't rubbish based on your inefficient polymer piece of shit?

[mellie]

For Pastaplanet,

Global Warming has become the core belief in a new eco-theology. The term is used as shorthand for anthropogenic (or man made) global warming. It is closely related to other modern belief systems, such as political correctness, chemophobia and various other forms of scaremongering, but it represents the vanguard in the assault on scientific man.

The activists now prefer to call it “climate change”. This gives them two advantages:
It allows them to seize as “evidence” the inevitable occurrences of unusually cold weather as well as warm ones.
The climate is always changing, so they must be right.


I think you might find this page helpful....

http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/religion.htm

[Pastafarian]

I was merely using the polymer piece of shit as you so eloquently put it as an example. Not the be all and end all of solar cell research.


TO be honest I don't have the inclination to argue with arrogant self-centred fucktards either. Therefore at last we've reached common ground.

[Sappho]

I promise you Pasta... not all right wingers are as stupid and irrelevant as Low IQ and Smelli Melli.

Man-made emissions are likely to cause a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide during this century and this increase will continue to have a warming effect on global temperatures. One of the disappointing distortions of the climate science debate is the claim that sceptics deny this relationship. What sceptics are sceptical about is the strength of this AGW effect. A strong AGW effect would be an increase in global average temperatures of 2.5 to 4 degrees or more, with potentially disruptive outcomes, such as a possible large rise in sea levels. A weak AGW effect would be an increase of 1 degree or less, a number of much less concern.
source

More than that... those of us who are inclined to this view equally believe that we should be working more vigorously towards sustainable low carbon engery sources.

[Pastafarian]

I promise you Pasta... not all right wingers are as stupid and irrelevant as Low IQ and Smelli Melli.


More than that... those of us who are inclined to this view equally believe that we should be working more vigorously towards sustainable low carbon engery sources.

It makes sense

[IQS.RLOW]

I was merely using the polymer piece of shit as you so eloquently put it as an example. Not the be all and end all of solar cell research.


TO be honest I don't have the inclination to argue with arrogant self-centred fucktards either. Therefore at last we've reached common ground.

Glad to see you have admitted that you are incapable of arguing your invalid point

Solar will never be the be all and end all. It is a furphy, propped up by ignoramuses who continue to promote sunshine and lollipops. Industry, the driver of economic prosperity needs grunt at a reasonable price not fairy tales. Grunt that can never be provided by solar in the near-mid future.

That's not to say that it can never ever be the answer, but govt intervention is NEVER the right answer- especially the govt we have now coupled with the tech available now.

I am all for low carbon energy sources as long as the playing field is level, which I have very high doubt is possible. The retards selling us down this path only like pat themselves on the back while having no inclination as to the flow on effects for local economics and industry except to say "oh, we'll sell them our tech that we have funded through the taxpayer" are naive in the extreme, especially coming from such a small and insignificant country. Bullets should be allocated and shallow graves should be dug for them forthwith

[Pastafarian]

I didn't realise I'd said solar was the be all and end all of reducing carbon emissions. Oh wait, thats because I fucking didn't.

[IQS.RLOW]

I didn't realise I'd said solar was the be all and end all of reducing carbon emissions. Oh wait, thats because I fucking didn't.

I just took your one illogical thought process for an expensive useless technology that you'd thought to use as an example and extrapolated it.
Feel free to come up with another

[Pastafarian]

I just took your one illogical thought process for an expensive useless technology that you'd thought to use as an example and extrapolated it.
Feel free to come up with another

I.e you went the US conservative FOx news thing take one argument, assume that because you disagree with it, you must disagree with everything I therefore say. Then say I support terrorism.