Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11788
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:47 pm
However the stalemate is resolved, Australia will still be a global polluter, exporting coal as fast as anyone can be got to buy it, vying with Canada to dig up the most uranium, failing to make even a minimal effort to control the largest per capita energy consumption in the world. Gillard may yet get to keep her executive jet, but the power-brokers will never let her pursue any policy that would cost votes.
Australia’s future looks grim enough with Gillard but with Abbott it would look terrifying.
Link:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... of-Oz.html
From a UK paper. Dos this summary represent the view down there back home really? It is the best i have read.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
J.W. Frogen
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:11 pm
Post
by J.W. Frogen » Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:55 pm
How was Australia supposed to know all that coal would be used for burning?
The Chinese assured us they were going to send it to Tibet in a sock for Christmas.
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11788
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:59 pm
Australia’s future looks grim enough with Gillard but with Abbott it would look terrifying.
Is this the view of you guys on the state of politics in Aus and the effect it will have on th future.
Also, China can make some big socks so i was expecting them to buy our raw materials, save them in socks and them us it just to build a landbridge to Japan to take them over.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Post
by IQSRLOW » Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:44 pm
If Germaine Greer is the best you have read, I suggest you need to visit a library pronto
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11788
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:29 pm
IQSRLOW wrote:If Germaine Greer is the best you have read, I suggest you need to visit a library pronto
I know i am getting slow in my old age but wtf are you on about?
Cheers,
SN
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Post
by IQSRLOW » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:54 pm
You said the article was the best you have read. It was written by Germaine Greer, an expat feminist cunthole waste of a vagina
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11788
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:00 am
IQSRLOW wrote:You said the article was the best you have read. It was written by Germaine Greer, an expat feminist cunthole waste of a vagina
Good catch. I did not even look who wrote it. Now my view of the article needs to be re-examined.
-
Ned Kelly
Post
by Ned Kelly » Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:53 pm
If:
It is the best (you) have read
..............what difference does it make who wrote it?
-
IQSRLOW
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm
Post
by IQSRLOW » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:39 pm
If that ^^^ comment was made by someone else it might be worth a reasonable response, but considering the source it is about the same level as toilet paper.
Capiche?
-
Ned Kelly
Post
by Ned Kelly » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:43 pm
Nah. If it's the best he's read, it is the best he's read, no matter the author.
Capiche?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests
