Are Races Equal?

[Bobby]

Hi Brian,
Gangs of Darkies form on our streets -
you hardly ever see one by themselves.
You see 2, or 4 or 6 or even a dozen or more.
Usually there's a ghetto blaster and
they seem to be wearing gang colors.
Some even have their trousers pulled down
to below their arse holes showing off their underpants.
If you're a white person you feel threatened
and you know that if a fight starts you're outnumbered and
some of them would be carrying a weapon -
that could be a knife or even a pistol.

Why has the gang culture especially amongst Darkies been
allowed to proliferate in Australia?

Yeah, sure, Bobby, sure. They haven't except in your imagination.

If you don't believe me then come to Melbourne -
go say to Dandenong and tell one of those Africans in a group to pull
their trousers up because they look like a poofter -
see what happens.

Perhaps if you change your mode of address and treated them with adequate respect, you might get a better response from people, Bobby. Real people get offended by being called names but then you should, if you are civilised, understand that. Tsk, tsk, tsk...

nah - tell em

pull your pants up - ya poofter.

[Bogan]

Aussie wrote

Okay...and remember......'Most of them support' my view.

I recall a great example. Martin Moriarty (now deceased) Barrister. Loved a drink, especially when out of town and doing a case in urban cities. The night before a Trial (criminal) was to commence, got himself completely smashed on the booze. As a very young Lawyer, I arrived at his Motel to pick him up and to take him to Court. The bloke was a mess. Dreadfully hung over....not functioning.

I got him there, and the Trial proceeded. He was atrocious, bloody awful, but managed to get through.

Then it came time for him to address the Jury in final submission. He had sobered up but was still well hung over, stooped in agony.

He 'stood' up, looked at the Jury and said, "If you have not worked this out by now, nothing I can say will assist you," and then slumped down.

Jury retired, and came back with their verdict an hour or so later. "Not guilty."

There ya go, Bogan. True story.

You can never convince anybody of anything if they are determined to not understand, to the point of replying with total gibberish and thinking that this makes them appear clever. If that is the best that you can do, then it reinforces my long held view that people who believe in the equality of races are either total morons or devious bastards. You will be happy to know that I don't think that you are devious.

Aussie wrote

Yes, and I did not understand what you were saying, apart from agreeing with you about your pretend village of white people.

You say that you are a lawyer and you can't understand plain English? Looks like I was wrong, you are dumb and devious. If you will not take this subject seriously and only want to prevaricate then I will put you on my list of trolls I will not respond to. I do not respond to trolls. I am sorry that we do not appear to have more impartial observers watching our exchange. You and your tactics are the best argument I have to prove how stupid and clearly dishonest the opposing side is.

I know, you are a lawyer and you get most of your work from defending aborigines, Pacific Islanders, and black people in general in the courts? I must admit that they give your kind a lot of work.

[Aussie]

And my guess is that you reckon that is a substantive and responsive reply.

It ain't. It is just ad hom.

[Bobby]

[Aussie]

Bogan....two matters:

1. You describe me as 'woke.' I do not know what you mean. Please clarify.

2. Please describe an aboriginal community as it was prior to 1770.

[Bogan]

To Aussie. I could answer your questions quite easily but why should I? You have already displayed that you are not interested in debating in good faith and you respond to well reasoned arguments with gibberish. You do not want to debate, your intent is to stifle debate. You are a troll and I do not bother with trolls.

[Aussie]

To Aussie. I could answer your questions quite easily but why should I? You have already displayed that you are not interested in debating in good faith and you respond to well reasoned arguments with gibberish. You do not want to debate, your intent is to stifle debate. You are a troll and I do not bother with trolls.

My questions are designed either to have something explained to me ('woke') or to have my opponent gain some insight into their own position, or to expose the weakness in their position.

[Bogan]

Too late, Troll.

[J o h n S m i t h]

Is someone still crying because others don't want to write in 300 words what they can say with 10 words?

[Bobby]

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/acc ... ll-meaning


Accusations of racism have lost all meaning
Like medieval tests for witchcraft, you’re damned either way, says Douglas Murray, since anyone who denies being a racist is automatically considered one
From magazine issue: 23 April 2022

This logical trap is the same one favoured by witch-dunkers in the Middle Ages: if the woman drowns, she is innocent; if she floats, she is a witch and can be burned. In [Robin] DiAngelo’s logic, the person who denies they are racist is racist and so is the person who says they are racist. Meaning that the best thing to do in any given situation is for a person to save time and confess to being a racist.

It’s odd, then, that in the UK, where everything is purportedly so racist and even the tap water must be white supremacist, people of colour are still willing to risk their lives to get in, and airports aren’t jammed with Jamaicans and Africans fleeing for sanctuary elsewhere. But it’s unlikely that Murray’s witty book will be read by those who really need to read it.