Are Races Equal?

[Bogan]

Forthose who think that races are equal, either because they are stupid, brainwashed, or in the case of Brian Ross and his public service mates, a vested interest in promoting this fiction for political reasons and their own self aggrandisment, please take note of the unacceptable situation in largely self governed "aboriginal" areas in the NT.

Excerpt from Mal Brough's speech at Deakin University 2007

"And those who have not read the report, Little Children are Sacred, its two authors visited 45 communities in the Northern Territory. They didn't find sexual abuse in some of those communities, they didn't find it in most of those communities, they found it in every single community; 45 out of 45. Think about that, the enormity of that for a moment. People coming forward with the most horrendous stories. We have children as young as three with gonorrhoea, we have twenty-four year old grandmothers, we have so many babies being born with alcohol foetal syndrome that their capacity to pass on the oral history of their people is gone before they're even born. We have physical and sexual abuse of boys and girls and men and women. It knows no boundaries."

"That is the reality in the Territory and it also in South Australia, it is also in Western Australia, it is in New South Wales and Queensland to differing degrees."

For those ignorant enough to think that all anyone need do to elevate aboriginal people to be productive citizens, indistinguishable from other Australians, is education, because the ignorant have a belief that all races are equal, consider these two concepts.

Two thirds of the NT education budget goes towards one third of students who are 'aboriginal" resulting in a 90% failure rate in NAPLAN testing. The two solutions to this problem loudly proclaimed by aboriginal activists and their white, virtue signaling comrades is ..

1. More money, more money, and even more money, to "close the gap" which never closes.
2. Ban NAPLAN testing to hide the obvious fact that aboriginal children are simply not smart enough to handle normal schoolwork, no matter how much money is thrown at the problem.

Next. Let's say that there was a town somewhere in Australia populated entirely with white Anglo-Saxon residents.

In that town, there were 23 year old grandmothers with grandchildren born with foetal alcohol syndrome. There was rampant sexual abuse of children with kids under five being routinely screened for gonorrhoea. The women in the town alleged widespread sexual abuse committed upon them by the town's male leaders. These women were 34 times more likely to be hospitalised for domestic violence and 15 times more likely to be murdered than the women in surrounding towns.

The entire adult population of that white town was entirely on intergenerational social welfare, and every two weeks when the government cheques rolled in, the whole town went on a three day drinking binge resulting in widespread violence and even riots where government supplied houses were burned to the ground.

The town's children suffered from lice and ringworm. The kids would not go to school, and the government had to bribe parents with extra benefits to make their kids go to school. In addition, the government had to provide cars and chauffeurs to take the kids to school and feed the kids, because their parents didn't bother. These kids were five times more likely to be hospitalised for domestic assaults than the kids from surrounding towns.

The only way that jobs could be created for the town's residents was to either make them public servants or by inventing taxpayer subsidised non jobs like picking up trash if they felt like it. When their young men were farmed out to very well paying government subsidised jobs outside of their community in the mining industry, most had to be sent back because 75% of them failed drug and alcohol testing.

Then I think that any intelligent and rational person ("Aussie" obviously does not qualify for that garland) would conclude that the town's population was a bunch of low IQ morons, commonly referred to as white trash.

But woke people like "Aussie", who think that displaying how non racist you are is more important than accepting self evident reality, will look for any reason to explain away aboriginal dysfunction, except the screamingly obvious one.

[Aussie]

I would never cite Mal Brough in support of any argument including whether it is day light or not. The bloke is a disgraced clown as is his failed 'intervention.'

I would expect zero positive outcomes in a town of the kind you describe.

You say I am 'woke.' Please define.

[brian ross]

Hi Brian,
Gangs of Darkies form on our streets -
you hardly ever see one by themselves.
You see 2, or 4 or 6 or even a dozen or more.
Usually there's a ghetto blaster and
they seem to be wearing gang colors.
Some even have their trousers pulled down
to below their arse holes showing off their underpants.
If you're a white person you feel threatened
and you know that if a fight starts you're outnumbered and
some of them would be carrying a weapon -
that could be a knife or even a pistol.

Why has the gang culture especially amongst Darkies been
allowed to proliferate in Australia?

Yeah, sure, Bobby, sure. They haven't except in your imagination.

[Bobby]

Hi Brian,
Gangs of Darkies form on our streets -
you hardly ever see one by themselves.
You see 2, or 4 or 6 or even a dozen or more.
Usually there's a ghetto blaster and
they seem to be wearing gang colors.
Some even have their trousers pulled down
to below their arse holes showing off their underpants.
If you're a white person you feel threatened
and you know that if a fight starts you're outnumbered and
some of them would be carrying a weapon -
that could be a knife or even a pistol.

Why has the gang culture especially amongst Darkies been
allowed to proliferate in Australia?

Yeah, sure, Bobby, sure. They haven't except in your imagination.

If you don't believe me then come to Melbourne -
go say to Dandenong and tell one of those Africans in a group to pull
their trousers up because they look like a poofter -
see what happens.

[Bogan]

To Aussie.

One of the reasons why I stopped posting on this site previously was the woeful quality of whatever left wing opponents cropped up from time to time, opposing me on critical issues. Aussie is a perfect specimen.

Okay, Mr Aussie. Let's say that you and me are speaking at a podium in front of 200 intelligent people who may or may not have open minds about this issue, but who are smart enough to be swayed by a good argument. Most of them may even support your view.

I get up and give a 773 word argument which clearly displays that aboriginal people quite clearly are not real bright, and give clear and concise examples of this being so.

You stand up to rebut. And all of the little virtue signalers who really want to believe that all races are equal are depending upon you to rebut my argument and give reasons with examples as to it must be that all races are equal.

Instead, you stand up and give a couple of sneery one liners totaling 47 words. One line just sneers at Mal Brough, while the other line says something which appears to be completely meaningless.

Don't you know what you just did to your doe eyed supporters who were depending upon you so much to explain why they believe that all races must be equal? You have just disappointed them so badly. Worse, since you their spokesman is so hopeless in explaining their own morally superior point of view, they might start to think that they may have been wrong? And all because you can not debate yourself out of a wet paper bag.

The reason why your replies are so hopeless is because you don't know anything except what you believe. Like Christian fundamentalists who BELIEVE that the universe was created in 6 days, you BELIEVE that races must be equal, because you want so much to believe so. But ask you to justify your BELIEF with a reasoned argument? You can't do it. Your entire belief system is simply wishful thinking.

My prediction is that you will respond to this post with another sneery one liner. it is all you can manage and you know it. But at least you can pretend that it makes you look wise and clever, even if it does not.

[Nom De Plume]

Do you have, hard scientific evidence for your your claims... Hard science, not wishy-washy soft science?

[Aussie]

To Aussie.

One of the reasons why I stopped posting on this site previously was the woeful quality of whatever left wing opponents cropped up from time to time, opposing me on critical issues. Aussie is a perfect specimen.

Okay, Mr Aussie. Let's say that you and me are speaking at a podium in front of 200 intelligent people who may or may not have open minds about this issue, but who are smart enough to be swayed by a good argument. Most of them may even support your view.

I get up and give a 773 word argument which clearly displays that aboriginal people quite clearly are not real bright, and give clear and concise examples of this being so.

You stand up to rebut. And all of the little virtue signalers who really want to believe that all races are equal are depending upon you to rebut my argument and give reasons with examples as to it must be that all races are equal.

Instead, you stand up and give a couple of sneery one liners totaling 47 words. One line just sneers at Mal Brough, while the other line says something which appears to be completely meaningless.

Don't you know what you just did to your doe eyed supporters who were depending upon you so much to explain why they believe that all races must be equal? You have just disappointed them so badly. Worse, since you their spokesman is so hopeless in explaining their own morally superior point of view, they might start to think that they may have been wrong? And all because you can not debate yourself out of a wet paper bag.

The reason why your replies are so hopeless is because you don't know anything except what you believe. Like Christian fundamentalists who BELIEVE that the universe was created in 6 days, you BELIEVE that races must be equal, because you want so much to believe so. But ask you to justify your BELIEF with a reasoned argument? You can't do it. Your entire belief system is simply wishful thinking.

My prediction is that you will respond to this post with another sneery one liner. it is all you can manage and you know it. But at least you can pretend that it makes you look wise and clever, even if it does not.

You referred to me as 'woke.' Please define.

I agreed with you that the village you described had nothing positive in its future.

Do you disagree with most commentators that Mal Brough is a disgraced clown and that his intervention was a complete failure and farce?

Please describe an aboriginal community prior to 1770.

[Aussie]

To Aussie.

One of the reasons why I stopped posting on this site previously was the woeful quality of whatever left wing opponents cropped up from time to time, opposing me on critical issues. Aussie is a perfect specimen.

Irrelevant.

Okay, Mr Aussie. Let's say that you and me are speaking at a podium in front of 200 intelligent people who may or may not have open minds about this issue, but who are smart enough to be swayed by a good argument. Most of them may even support your view.

Okay...and remember......'Most of them support' my view.

I recall a great example. Martin Moriarty (now deceased) Barrister. Loved a drink, especially when out of town and doing a case in urban cities. The night before a Trial (criminal) was to commence, got himself completely smashed on the booze. As a very young Lawyer, I arrived at his Motel to pick him up and to take him to Court. The bloke was a mess. Dreadfully hung over....not functioning.

I got him there, and the Trial proceeded. He was atrocious, bloody awful, but managed to get through.

Then it came time for him to address the Jury in final submission. He had sobered up but was still well hung over, stooped in agony.

He 'stood' up, looked at the Jury and said, "If you have not worked this out by now, nothing I can say will assist you," and then slumped down.

Jury retired, and came back with their verdict an hour or so later. "Not guilty."

There ya go, Bogan. True story.

I get up and give a 773 word argument which clearly displays that aboriginal people quite clearly are not real bright, and give clear and concise examples of this being so.

You stand up to rebut. And all of the little virtue signalers who really want to believe that all races are equal are depending upon you to rebut my argument and give reasons with examples as to it must be that all races are equal.

Yes, and I did not understand what you were saying, apart from agreeing with you about your pretend village of white people.

Instead, you stand up and give a couple of sneery one liners totaling 47 words. One line just sneers at Mal Brough, while the other line says something which appears to be completely meaningless.

"If you have not worked this out by now, nothing I can say will assist you."

Don't you know what you just did to your doe eyed supporters who were depending upon you so much to explain why they believe that all races must be equal? You have just disappointed them so badly. Worse, since you their spokesman is so hopeless in explaining their own morally superior point of view, they might start to think that they may have been wrong? And all because you can not debate yourself out of a wet paper bag.

You have to carry your own argument, and if you have not made it, then why should I not say so? I can just sit back and say, "If you have not worked this out by now, nothing I can say will assist you." The crowd, being on my side, cheer wildly!

The reason why your replies are so hopeless is because you don't know anything except what you believe. Like Christian fundamentalists who BELIEVE that the universe was created in 6 days, you BELIEVE that races must be equal, because you want so much to believe so. But ask you to justify your BELIEF with a reasoned argument? You can't do it. Your entire belief system is simply wishful thinking.

How bizarre to conflate a biblical fairytail with some discussion about the relative merits and qualities of different races. I have no special brief that all races on all matters are equal at all. Fact is, they are not equal on all matters. Show me more than a hand full of black Olympic swimmers at the Olympics.

My prediction is that you will respond to this post with another sneery one liner. it is all you can manage and you know it. But at least you can pretend that it makes you look wise and clever, even if it does not.

You fail.

[brian ross]

Hi Brian,
Gangs of Darkies form on our streets -
you hardly ever see one by themselves.
You see 2, or 4 or 6 or even a dozen or more.
Usually there's a ghetto blaster and
they seem to be wearing gang colors.
Some even have their trousers pulled down
to below their arse holes showing off their underpants.
If you're a white person you feel threatened
and you know that if a fight starts you're outnumbered and
some of them would be carrying a weapon -
that could be a knife or even a pistol.

Why has the gang culture especially amongst Darkies been
allowed to proliferate in Australia?

Yeah, sure, Bobby, sure. They haven't except in your imagination.

If you don't believe me then come to Melbourne -
go say to Dandenong and tell one of those Africans in a group to pull
their trousers up because they look like a poofter -
see what happens.

Perhaps if you change your mode of address and treated them with adequate respect, you might get a better response from people, Bobby. Real people get offended by being called names but then you should, if you are civilised, understand that. Tsk, tsk, tsk...

[Nom De Plume]

I recall a great example. Martin Moriarty (now deceased) Barrister. Loved a drink, especially when out of town and doing a case in urban cities. The night before a Trial (criminal) was to commence, got himself completely smashed on the booze. As a very young Lawyer, I arrived at his Motel to pick him up and to take him to Court. The bloke was a mess. Dreadfully hung over....not functioning.

I got him there, and the Trial proceeded. He was atrocious, bloody awful, but managed to get through.

Then it came time for him to address the Jury in final submission. He had sobered up but was still well hung over, stooped in agony.

He 'stood' up, looked at the Jury and said, "If you have not worked this out by now, nothing I can say will assist you," and then slumped down.

Jury retired, and came back with their verdict an hour or so later. "Not guilty."

There ya go, Bogan. True story.

Objection; Hearsay!