Election Apr 26

[UnSubRocky]

I shall support the people who put together common sense posts.

Up til now you've failed in doing this.

Just because you are not one of them, does not mean that I have failed.

[Aussie]

I shall support the people who put together common sense posts.

Up til now you've failed in doing this.

Just because you are not one of them, does not mean that I have failed.

You keep dodging your explanation as to why, given your claim of support for 'common sense posts' you voted for Monk who has made the most insane, abusive, ridiculous posts almost ever over the last several weeks.

[lisa jones]

I shall support the people who put together common sense posts.

Up til now you've failed in doing this.

Just because you are not one of them, does not mean that I have failed.

Up til now you have NOT supported people who have put together common sense posts at all IRRESPECTIVE of who they are. Instead you have deliberately supported the most narcissistic toxic trolls PA has ever seen. For whatever reason...you seem to identify with forum psychopaths. Why is that?

[J o h n S m i t h]

And whilst I have only just restarted posting here, I have read enough over time to know what goes on.

so you refused to post under BO ... interesting

[J o h n S m i t h]

You keep dodging your explanation as to why, given your claim of support for 'common sense posts' you voted for Monk who has made the most insane, abusive, ridiculous posts almost ever over the last several weeks.

no one owes you, or anyone else, an explanation as to how they vote

[lisa jones]

I shall support the people who put together common sense posts.

Up til now you've failed in doing this.

Just because you are not one of them, does not mean that I have failed.

You keep dodging your explanation as to why, given your claim of support for 'common sense posts' you voted for Monk who has made the most insane, abusive, ridiculous posts almost ever over the last several weeks.

UnSubRocky is clearly very conflicted. That's why he SAYS 1 thing but then does the exact opposite.

I just don't get why he identifies with online toxic narcissistic psychopaths. Across both sister sites.

[J o h n S m i t h]

I just don't get why he identifies with online toxic narcissistic psychopaths

liar, he's never identified with you

[lisa jones]

I shall support the people who put together common sense posts.

Up til now you've failed in doing this.

Just because you are not one of them, does not mean that I have failed.

Up til now you have NOT supported people who have put together common sense posts at all IRRESPECTIVE of who they are. Instead you have deliberately supported the most narcissistic toxic trolls PA has ever seen. For whatever reason...you seem to identify with forum psychopaths. Why is that?

UnSub? You've gone ever so quiet. Once again it's either Drunk or Frodo Stinks who jumps in to answer FOR you.

[UnSubRocky]

I shall support the people who put together common sense posts.

Up til now you've failed in doing this.

Just because you are not one of them, does not mean that I have failed.

Up til now you have NOT supported people who have put together common sense posts at all IRRESPECTIVE of who they are. Instead you have deliberately supported the most narcissistic toxic trolls PA has ever seen. For whatever reason...you seem to identify with forum psychopaths. Why is that?

You are not qualified to deem someone as a "psychopath". The best you can do is suggest the possibility. And for the record, I am not qualified to make that assessment, either. Your strawman argument that I go about supporting "the most narcissistic toxic trolls PA has ever seen" is erroneous. I would caution that if you were dealing with psychopaths, you would not know that they are psychopaths over a forum. You have no context to understand whether or not someone displays psychopathic tendencies. Even qualified psychologists cannot make that determination over a discussion forum.

What am I up to in a post count here? 25? Even with my 9+ years at OzPol interacting (online) with other posters who also frequent this forum, I cannot say that I know these people personally. So far (and to your credit), you have not named anyone on this forum site as a "psychopath". You merely allege that I have interacted in support of alleged psychopaths. Your last two sentences even imply an allegation that *I* am a psychopath. Please, do correct me if I have that surmise incorrect. The psychologists and psychiatrists that I have met in Rockhampton here have said that I have a mild obsessive compulsiveness mixed with a post traumatic stress disorder. And my diagnosed schizophrenia has encapsulated some of my personality traits. No psychiatrist or psychologist has said that I am psychotic or even sociopathic.

I wonder if the people you label psychopaths have had any accredited professionals diagnose them as such. I doubt it.

[Aussie]

You keep dodging your explanation as to why, given your claim of support for 'common sense posts' you voted for Monk who has made the most insane, abusive, ridiculous posts almost ever over the last several weeks.

no one owes you, or anyone else, an explanation as to how they vote

Correct, but when a numpty offers an explanation which puts shit on me, I am going to enquire what he reckons Monk posted which was 'common sense.'

He has run away from the question.