Libs targetting Wogs, Abos and homeless in next election

[Crackey]

...... You should have a job or be retired from work. Dole bludgers should not get a vote as they have not contributed, so deserve no voice.
......

So you see it as a negative thing, allowing those who would vote for more employment ... enough jobs for everyone. That'd be awful.

[Valkie]

...... You should have a job or be retired from work. Dole bludgers should not get a vote as they have not contributed, so deserve no voice.
......

So you see it as a negative thing, allowing those who would vote for more employment ... enough jobs for everyone. That'd be awful.

Not at all.
People who have worked and paid tax, who have saved and own property.
Have a vested interest in helping people get work and jobs.

It would give the voice to the silent majority instead of the vocal minority.
At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention and all the politicians time and effort, simply because they are loud and obnoxious, because they have all the time in the world.

The silent majority are the workers who aren't loud or obnoxious.
So they are passed over and ignored.
It's time the contributors, the taxpayers, the workers had a say about what is done with the taxes they pay.

Rather than the dole bludgers who only take and never give.

[Crackey]

...... You should have a job or be retired from work. Dole bludgers should not get a vote as they have not contributed, so deserve no voice.
......

So you see it as a negative thing, allowing those who would vote for more employment ... enough jobs for everyone. That'd be awful.

Not at all.
People who have worked and paid tax, who have saved and own property.
Have a vested interest in helping people get work and jobs.

It would give the voice to the silent majority instead of the vocal minority.
At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention and all the politicians time and effort, simply because they are loud and obnoxious, because they have all the time in the world.

The silent majority are the workers who aren't loud or obnoxious.
So they are passed over and ignored.
It's time the contributors, the taxpayers, the workers had a say about what is done with the taxes they pay.

Rather than the dole bludgers who only take and never give.

People who have worked and paid tax, who have saved and own property.
Have a vested interest in helping people get work and jobs.

And that "vested interest" has enabled the population to be free of rising unemployment or is it mostly focused on helping to provide an excess of income in order to "save and own property" for those who are employed?

It would give the voice to the silent majority instead of the vocal minority.

What is the difference between the two other than the "vocal" majority holding up a mirror to the problem of the nation’s unemployment problem, in other words shouting, ”We want jobs!”, while the "silent" cower?

At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention …

… and you see this is as whinging?

… and all the politicians time and effort, simply because they are loud and obnoxious, because they have all the time in the world.

So, the "vocal" bastards are whinging about the lack of employment in the nation which is doubly obnoxious because they themselves are unemployed thus “have all the time in the world” to whinge about their situation - the fact that they are being criticised for being unemployed in the first place - and being criticised for whinging ”vocally”?

The silent majority are the workers who aren't loud or obnoxious.

Right, the employed haven’t the time to protest about the job situation … it’s only the ”obnoxious” jobless who voice their dissatisfaction with there being a lack of employment possibilities. You find that illogical?

So they are passed over and ignored.

What is your point?

It's time the contributors, the taxpayers, the workers had a say about what is done with the taxes they pay.

And those taxes ought not to go to improving the employment situation?

Rather than the dole bludgers who only take and never give.

What exactly is it that those ”dole bludgers” are taking? And what is it they should give? Tell me. I’m listening.
What you are saying, in essence, is:

1). Worker’s taxes should not be spent on helping to create jobs. “the taxpayers, the workers ….. a say about what is done with the taxes they pay”.
2). Worker’s taxes should not be spent on providing the unemployed with any sort of support.
3). The unemployed should keep their mouths shut about the situation. “At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention …” and because they are unemployed “ … they have all the time in the world”

YOUR FINAL ANALYSIS: “I’m alright Jack”.

[Valkie]

...... You should have a job or be retired from work. Dole bludgers should not get a vote as they have not contributed, so deserve no voice.
......

So you see it as a negative thing, allowing those who would vote for more employment ... enough jobs for everyone. That'd be awful.

Not at all.
People who have worked and paid tax, who have saved and own property.
Have a vested interest in helping people get work and jobs.

It would give the voice to the silent majority instead of the vocal minority.
At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention and all the politicians time and effort, simply because they are loud and obnoxious, because they have all the time in the world.

The silent majority are the workers who aren't loud or obnoxious.
So they are passed over and ignored.
It's time the contributors, the taxpayers, the workers had a say about what is done with the taxes they pay.

Rather than the dole bludgers who only take and never give.

People who have worked and paid tax, who have saved and own property.
Have a vested interest in helping people get work and jobs.

And that "vested interest" has enabled the population to be free of rising unemployment or is it mostly focused on helping to provide an excess of income in order to "save and own property" for those who are employed?

It would give the voice to the silent majority instead of the vocal minority.

What is the difference between the two other than the "vocal" majority holding up a mirror to the problem of the nation’s unemployment problem, in other words shouting, ”We want jobs!”, while the "silent" cower?

At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention …

… and you see this is as whinging?

… and all the politicians time and effort, simply because they are loud and obnoxious, because they have all the time in the world.

So, the "vocal" bastards are whinging about the lack of employment in the nation which is doubly obnoxious because they themselves are unemployed thus “have all the time in the world” to whinge about their situation - the fact that they are being criticised for being unemployed in the first place - and being criticised for whinging ”vocally”?

The silent majority are the workers who aren't loud or obnoxious.

Right, the employed haven’t the time to protest about the job situation … it’s only the ”obnoxious” jobless who voice their dissatisfaction with there being a lack of employment possibilities. You find that illogical?

So they are passed over and ignored.

What is your point?

It's time the contributors, the taxpayers, the workers had a say about what is done with the taxes they pay.

And those taxes ought not to go to improving the employment situation?

Rather than the dole bludgers who only take and never give.

What exactly is it that those ”dole bludgers” are taking? And what is it they should give? Tell me. I’m listening.
What you are saying, in essence, is:

1). Worker’s taxes should not be spent on helping to create jobs. “the taxpayers, the workers ….. a say about what is done with the taxes they pay”.
2). Worker’s taxes should not be spent on providing the unemployed with any sort of support.
3). The unemployed should keep their mouths shut about the situation. “At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention …” and because they are unemployed “ … they have all the time in the world”

YOUR FINAL ANALYSIS: “I’m alright Jack”.

Not quite.

I have seen Australia go down the gurgler because of the vocal minority.
Children being used as fodder for the twisted perverts with an agenda, gender fluidity is destroying the world
Family units gradually falling apart
man and women being afraid to be "Normal"
Fringe groups everywhere
Education standards on a freefall in favor of feminist policy
Unemployment is now a lifestyle rather than a stopgap.
Lying politicians now the accepted norm
Christian values thrown out while pagan worship of a sociopath, nutcase murdering coward Mo the Mad.
Look again my friend, Australia is going backward because minority groups have too much power

Give the power back to the contributors, not those who rely on being parasites.
Because the parasites will only work toward maintaining their lifestyle

[Trevor P]

Hello.

Is gender fluidity really a problem. Being a libertarian I think people should make personal choices.

[Crackey]

...... You should have a job or be retired from work. Dole bludgers should not get a vote as they have not contributed, so deserve no voice.
......

So you see it as a negative thing, allowing those who would vote for more employment ... enough jobs for everyone. That'd be awful.

Not at all.
People who have worked and paid tax, who have saved and own property.
Have a vested interest in helping people get work and jobs.

It would give the voice to the silent majority instead of the vocal minority.
At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention and all the politicians time and effort, simply because they are loud and obnoxious, because they have all the time in the world.

The silent majority are the workers who aren't loud or obnoxious.
So they are passed over and ignored.
It's time the contributors, the taxpayers, the workers had a say about what is done with the taxes they pay.

Rather than the dole bludgers who only take and never give.

People who have worked and paid tax, who have saved and own property.
Have a vested interest in helping people get work and jobs.

And that "vested interest" has enabled the population to be free of rising unemployment or is it mostly focused on helping to provide an excess of income in order to "save and own property" for those who are employed?

It would give the voice to the silent majority instead of the vocal minority.

What is the difference between the two other than the "vocal" majority holding up a mirror to the problem of the nation’s unemployment problem, in other words shouting, ”We want jobs!”, while the "silent" cower?

At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention …

… and you see this is as whinging?

… and all the politicians time and effort, simply because they are loud and obnoxious, because they have all the time in the world.

So, the "vocal" bastards are whinging about the lack of employment in the nation which is doubly obnoxious because they themselves are unemployed thus “have all the time in the world” to whinge about their situation - the fact that they are being criticised for being unemployed in the first place - and being criticised for whinging ”vocally”?

The silent majority are the workers who aren't loud or obnoxious.

Right, the employed haven’t the time to protest about the job situation … it’s only the ”obnoxious” jobless who voice their dissatisfaction with there being a lack of employment possibilities. You find that illogical?

So they are passed over and ignored.

What is your point?

It's time the contributors, the taxpayers, the workers had a say about what is done with the taxes they pay.

And those taxes ought not to go to improving the employment situation?

Rather than the dole bludgers who only take and never give.

What exactly is it that those ”dole bludgers” are taking? And what is it they should give? Tell me. I’m listening.
What you are saying, in essence, is:

1). Worker’s taxes should not be spent on helping to create jobs. “the taxpayers, the workers ….. a say about what is done with the taxes they pay”.
2). Worker’s taxes should not be spent on providing the unemployed with any sort of support.
3). The unemployed should keep their mouths shut about the situation. “At the moment the very vocal minority seem to get all the attention …” and because they are unemployed “ … they have all the time in the world”

YOUR FINAL ANALYSIS: “I’m alright Jack”.

Not quite.

I have seen Australia go down the gurgler because of the vocal minority.
Children being used as fodder for the twisted perverts with an agenda, gender fluidity is destroying the world
Family units gradually falling apart
man and women being afraid to be "Normal"
Fringe groups everywhere
Education standards on a freefall in favor of feminist policy
Unemployment is now a lifestyle rather than a stopgap.
Lying politicians now the accepted norm
Christian values thrown out while pagan worship of a sociopath, nutcase murdering coward Mo the Mad.
Look again my friend, Australia is going backward because minority groups have too much power

Give the power back to the contributors, not those who rely on being parasites.
Because the parasites will only work toward maintaining their lifestyle

Surely you cannot blame all of that on the "vocally" unemployed! The fundamental fact is that if there are not enough jobs to go round then unemployment will persist. If you cannot provide jobs for everyone then you either:

1). offer adequate unemployment benefits
2). witness starvation
3). endure an ever-increasing crime rate

I have much to say about extreme wealth living amongst the destitute but I'll leave it until the next challenger steps up.

[Valkie]

There may not be total employment availability.

But the fact that we are importing immigrants to fill roles which dole bludgers WONT fill means that they are simply lazy.

If you look at any of the recent protests, most of them are unemployed, just looking far a cause to get over boredom.

When was the last time there was a mass protest about safety of factory workers?

Because they have to work and cannot have a protest.

If there is work for immigrants (over 100 thousand according to the paper) then there is work for over 100 thousand dole bludgers.
The immigrants travel vast distances by plane to work
Our dole bludgers wont travel 5 klm.

Its a joke.

[Crackey]

There may not be total employment availability.

That's the main point.

But the fact that we are importing immigrants to fill roles which dole bludgers WONT fill means that they are simply lazy.

That's a crock. Your major problem (presumably) is that you are importing immigrants. Don't blame it on the Aussie who's been denied a job.

If you look at any of the recent protests, most of them are unemployed, just looking far a cause to get over boredom.

And what is it you think they should do? Your words and your brain are disconnected. It's as though you write it down but don't read it. Looky here: Unemployment = Bordedom = double Dissatisfaction. Your default advice is that they go sit in a hole and keep their mouths shut.

When was the last time there was a mass protest about safety of factory workers? Because they have to work and cannot have a protest.

So, give the Aussie a job and the problem will be solved. You don't get it yet?

If there is work for immigrants (over 100 thousand according to the paper) then there is work for over 100 thousand dole bludgers.

Please forgive me for asking but are you stupid?

[lisa jones]

There may not be total employment availability.

That's the main point.

But the fact that we are importing immigrants to fill roles which dole bludgers WONT fill means that they are simply lazy.

That's a crock. Your major problem (presumably) is that you are importing immigrants. Don't blame it on the Aussie who's been denied a job.

If you look at any of the recent protests, most of them are unemployed, just looking far a cause to get over boredom.

And what is it you think they should do? Your words and your brain are disconnected. It's as though you write it down but don't read it. Looky here: Unemployment = Bordedom = double Dissatisfaction. Your default advice is that they go sit in a hole and keep their mouths shut.

When was the last time there was a mass protest about safety of factory workers? Because they have to work and cannot have a protest.

So, give the Aussie a job and the problem will be solved. You don't get it yet?

If there is work for immigrants (over 100 thousand according to the paper) then there is work for over 100 thousand dole bludgers.

Please forgive me for asking but are you stupid?

Don't give a fuck if you forgive me or not but why are you here Frodo?

Do you think we need to see your IP to identify your particular brand of inane insanity?

[Crackey]

There may not be total employment availability.

That's the main point.

But the fact that we are importing immigrants to fill roles which dole bludgers WONT fill means that they are simply lazy.

That's a crock. Your major problem (presumably) is that you are importing immigrants. Don't blame it on the Aussie who's been denied a job.

If you look at any of the recent protests, most of them are unemployed, just looking far a cause to get over boredom.

And what is it you think they should do? Your words and your brain are disconnected. It's as though you write it down but don't read it. Looky here: Unemployment = Bordedom = double Dissatisfaction. Your default advice is that they go sit in a hole and keep their mouths shut.

When was the last time there was a mass protest about safety of factory workers? Because they have to work and cannot have a protest.

So, give the Aussie a job and the problem will be solved. You don't get it yet?

If there is work for immigrants (over 100 thousand according to the paper) then there is work for over 100 thousand dole bludgers.

Please forgive me for asking but are you stupid?

Don't give a fuck if you forgive me or not but why are you here Frodo?

Do you think we need to see your IP to identify your particular brand of inane insanity?

"Forgive you"? Where do you see me forgiving you in the quote of me you've pasted? Who are you talking to? You've addressed it to me but there is no logic in it. I am trying to decide if I should give you a bullocking or kindly advise you to pay closer attention to what you say, to whom ..... and why. Are you the one who accused me of being someone else quite a few weeks ago? I mean seriously, is that what this is all about? If so, you can stuff yourself and I can tell you that it's turning into a comedy and that won't bring you any joy. And if you want to do this "IP identify" thing then knock yourself out but the outcome is going to leave you feeling pretty stupid. Have a nice day, sweetheart.